The Effects of Team Dynamics on Corporate Communication

A person whose personality function primary is primarily feeling can be hard to detect but, can be detected by using the same steps used to find a person’s personality whose primary function is thinking.

Communication is the foundation of all teams’ functionality. It can travel in various methods and manners.

Communication is a tremendous aspect of everyday life. The effects of positive and negative communication are imperative to making deals, providing information, and even everyday office interaction. The way people communicate with each other defines their character, especially in an office setting. Positive communication skills are appreciated and are the basis of running a successful company. Conversely, negative communication can lead to business failure, as well as poor relationships with co-workers. Three positive methods of communication are active listening, effective speaking, and confidence. Three negative methods of communication are strong reactions, providing misleading information, and the use improper communication tools. Ari

According to the Typology Test (1998-2015) I have a moderate preference for Thinking over Feeling by 47%. The Four Preferences describes individuals with this preference as people that make decision based on logic and reason (Personality Page, 1998-2014). This assessment is valid in comparison with my personality. I often think about logic and reasoning. I could recall instances in the past where I have been frustrated for someone’s lack of reasoning through situations.

The results of my Myers-Briggs Personality type test were as follows: extrovert, intuition, thinking and judging. As I read what each category meant, I could see those characteristics within myself. I love to be around people, socializing or just people watching. I prefer things to be planned and to think of solutions outside the box. I also look at the big picture of things before making a plan of action. The following two stories display my thought process in different areas and the affects it had in my life or how I dealt with the situations.

My profile also said I was more of the thinking personality than feeling. I believe that when people think with their feelings, it clouds their judgment. I make decisions without involving my emotions. Even though I try not to assume, my personality is perceiving, I tend to assume in order to get things done quicker and more

The topic focused in this paper within teamwork is communication. In teamwork, communication in an important part in order to achieve success and reach goals. This was the reason why this topic was chosen because; establishing good communication facilitates team work and achievements. This paper will be discussing four good practices that are important for communication, which are suggested by peer-reviewed scholarly articles. Each good practice is provided with an example of how it can be used in my discipline and why it could be helpful. My first practice is to establish a dialogue and hold a common ground as a team. This means to not treat the team as a debate with others, but rather with mutual respect. My second good practice in communication looks as individual communication skills, and assertiveness. My third practice views team communication skills, including team conflict resolution. The final good practice looks how to communicate during the decision making process as a team. In addition a useful technique in part of decision making is brainstorming. Following each practice will assist the team and its members to have good communication and form a stronger team.

Of the two, analytical thinking was my most dominant trait. Unbiased, analytical thinkers prefer to make decisions based on facts. Using logic, they rule their decision making by their head and not their hearts. Again, these are results that I would also have to agree with. Knowing that emotions can make one think irrationally, I prefer to analyze a situation in full. Preferring to do what is most beneficial or what is right, I always go through the pros and cons of every possibility, always choosing the most

This essay aims to analyse how personality can affect the performance of teams. This essay will also explore various theories relevant to personalities and will assess how different personalities can be beneficial in increasing team performance as well as any disadvantages. This essay will also explore how personality can affect the inter-personal relationship between team members.

The group was predominantly extroverted and judgment-inclined, with half the group having an inclination for sensing and feeling, and the other for intuition and thinking, according to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI; Myers & McCaulley, 1985). The leader rated as an ISFP, with marginal preference for introversion, while the most dominant member of the group was found to be ENTJ, the opposite end of scale. Due to the different preferences and styles of making decisions, members came to decisions at different paces; slower thinkers felt some pressure to speed up and come

In our class discussion about our personality type, I found new characteristics about myself. I already knew that I am introverted because it is my most noticeable trait, but I did not know that I also fall under the categories of sensing, thinking, and feeling. The idea of sensing says that people who fall under this category like to deal with actual problems and events. I was unaware that I fall in this category because I tend to focus on my future goals, but I also like to concentrate myself on what I am currently doing to get there. I didn’t know that my focus on the present is more important to me than the future. I agreed more with being placed in the thinking type because I do tend to rely on logical solutions to problems, rather than

There are four different social styles that contribute to the interactive dynamics of a team (Griffith & Dunham, 2015). “Group members express themselves in a multitude of ways ranging from productive to destructive” (Griffith & Dunham, 2015, p. 47). The four classification of styles include: analytic, driver, expressive, or amiable (Griffith & Dunham, 2015). Being able to recognize the different social styles, including faults in our own, can assist in effective communicative efforts, as well as determining what makes a person more comfortable (Tracom, 2018). Communication competence is vital, not only our personal life, but our professional one as well (Waldherr & Muck, 2011).

My feeling personality aspect is the highest, and means that I make my decisions based on emotions. This has hindered me in life and work because I end up making decisions without giving myself the change to analyze a situation without thinking about all possible outcomes. With my feelings being a huge personality aspect, I have always been too concerned with how others judge me. In leadership, this could cause me to fail if I don’t believe my team has faith in me to succeed, which would then take my attention away from business goals, and instead I would focus more on if my organization supported me as a

The first two chapters discussed the relevant background factors and the internal influences such as the art of communication involving verbal and nonverbal, defensive and supportive, emotional intelligence, and team dynamics (Tubbs, 2012). Although these concepts apply to all aspects of communication, the Tubbs model focuses more on using the communication skills to the small group context. Looking at the different types of communication and the emotional intelligence part was very eye-opening. Communication is the essence of leadership, and there is a secure connection between one’s

Before discussing leadership styles and their affects on group communications of a specific company, it is important to first identify the organizational structure of that company. Different organizational structures may lend themselves more toward specific leadership styles then others. “A company’s individual organizational structure is a formal composition of task reporting relationships that allows the company to control, coordinate, and motivate employees so a common goal can be achieved” (George & Jones, 2005, p. 505). Coordinate in this context refers to the communication efforts made between upper management, middle management, site management, and