Essay The Effects of War and Peace on Foreign Aid

Some of the main reasons why Australia provides foreign aid is to increase advanced systems and technology in other countries, decrease poverty, make other countries more stable generally and financially, etc. Some government and non-government organization like Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), AusAID, World vision, Red cross, etc. also help provide foreign aid to other countries. Australia’s 10 main focus points and the status of achievement for some of the following in providing aid to other countries are towards the following:

She intertwines her experiences in the industry of aid and development to a shocking revelation that a general being of the society wouldn’t be aware of. The author persists that in order to progress with sustainable development goals we first need to be aware of our own involvement. We are all consumers of war, and therefore we are connected to war. She determines that aid should not be militarized rather should remain neutral for its sanctity to provide only civilian relief. When it is militarized, it is politicized and loses its legitimacy. The author perpetuates her three main sustainable development goals; first to eliminate gender divide by investing in women and girls. Second, she eradicates the need for decent work and economic growth for youths in order to prevent them from becoming militants and rather serving their nation as educated leaders. The final sustainable development goal that the author persists is peace, justice and strong institutions. Post war nations have now become lawless and crimes are being committed without perpetrators being held accountable. She suggests that there needs to be a greater investment of legal mechanisms within those nations. Nutt believes in long-term sustainable goals however these can be criticized to be only in the hands of great nation leaders. Though now we are greatly aware, we cannot resolve issues that are highly political. To

Riddell, Roger C. 2007. Does Foreign Aid Really Work? 1st ed. OXFORD: Oxford University Press, USA.

According the US Census Bureau, the United States spent $44.957 billion on foreign aid in 2009, in terms of total foreign assistance. Of that, just over $11 billion was military assistance. The nations that received the most foreign aid were Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel and Pakistan. Some aid went to financial institutions and to aid agencies, and therefore is difficult to classify by country. By regions, Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East were the biggest recipients of foreign aid. The recipients and types of foreign aid are indicative of priorities that the US government has with respect to foreign relations. As many people applaud high levels of foreign aid from the US to poor countries around the world, foreign aid also has its critics. From a domestic perspective, criticisms include the argument that this money would be better used in the United States, and the libertarian argument against all forms of foreign aid in general. It is worth noting that many critics of foreign aid still support aid to support military objectives, which includes the four largest recipient of aid (Traub, 2011). External critics of foreign aid argue that such aid has generally failed to achieve its objectives, for a variety of reasons ranging from rapidly increasing populations to corruption to the promotion of dependency relationships (Bovard, 1986). This paper will analyze US foreign aid in the context of its success and failures and make the case that the United States

The question at hand is not whether aid from the developed north should be given at all, but whether or not it should be increased to help ease the suffering of the developing countries in the south. Every country, whether rich or poor, should have compassion for the suffering. However, it is not the duty of the developed north to completely take care of every developing country. In the present, there are serious problems that need to be addressed dealing with how aid is given out: misuse of funds by governments, the corruption it creates, economies it destroys, lack of votes it buys at the United Nations, and finally the question of who has priority.

Aid, as a concept of international development, has been at the centre of countless debates and has been studied through sizeable number of research over the past several decades; yet, there is no consensus among development sector experts on whether it works or not.

Foreign aid is money, food, or other resources given or lent by one country to

Many people have viewed the ads about hungry children in Africa and have felt the sadness upon seeing these malnourished children. Many organizations put up ads like these and they are known most commonly as Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs); they are the ones who are most involved in giving traditional humanitarian aid: providing food, water, and shelter to refugees. People admire NGOs for the difference that they strive to improve the lives of others. However, many donors and benefactors of non-governmental organizations really know what is being accomplished by them. NGOs are cloudy in portraying their actual doings, and as researchers dig and evaluate , they discover unpleasant truths about NGOs. The truth is that NGOs are actually ineffective in many areas of their organization, and their inefficiency is what inhibits them from alleviating people´s suffering the best that they can.

In the destructive wake of WWII, it was general consensus that a world peace organization be formed. That organization came in the form of the United Nations, an institution once notorious for its peacekeeping abilities. From corner to corner of the globe, peacekeeping troops were deployed in attempt to relieve conflict in disputed regions. These troops once served as a beacon of hope for impoverished families in times of war, but, as time progressed, the quality of peacekeeping operations have degraded, and such, civilians became more wary of their presence. What UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon now calls “a cancer in our system” has been highly disputed. With the future of both civilians and entire countries at stake, it’s important to ask “What can be done to improve the U.N. peacekeeping force?”

IO and NGOs are being limited by the dilemma of neutrality, between the mission of humanitarian intervention and

Aid donors often want to ensure that the aid they provide reaches and supports the target population in countries affected by war (Chr Michelsen Institute, & Bergen 2). However, with civilians working as both strategic targets and “militarized” actors targets in the modern-day conflicts, the issue of humanitarian organizations providing relief services in war-torn areas has increasingly been politicized. Factions targeting the civilians in war torn regions see any aid to civilians as “opponents” supporting the enemy (THE ELLIOTT SCHOOL INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS AT GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 3). The factions view the provision of assistance and resource to the civilians as materially supporting hence supporting one side involved in the conflict. This viewpoint goes against humanitarian relief organization’s “provide aid but take no side” credo. Worse, the politicization of relief or aid may cause those representing non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and agencies on the ground to be turned into strategic targets by opposing factions in the conflict. Hostile factions attack representatives of the agency, local and international Non-governmental organizations in the field with a view to obtaining goods and services and to prevent aid from reaching the targeted civilian population by that faction (THE ELLIOTT SCHOOL INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS AT GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 3). Besides, destruction of aid infrastructure and robbery

The Article “NGOs, A Tainted History” by Firoze Manji and Carl O'Coill is about how NGOs form a prominent part of the development machine in the developing world. With the thousands of NGOs that are now present in the world, their role in development is increasing every year. While their work contributes marginally to the relief of poverty, it also undermines the struggle of the African people to relieve them from economic, social and political

As a developing countries Bangladesh can not meet its all demand by own economic ability so it takes foreign aid for implementing its development purposes. It has got foreign aid for its several development issues like Jamuna and Padma Bridge. Not only structural development is implemented by foreign aid but also several long term policy and projects are done by it. But the effectiveness of foreign aids to the third world developing countries like Bangladesh is a controversial issue. Liberal economists argue that aids both in the form of grants and loans can play vital role to the development of any country, if it is channeled through proper biding and use effectively to the development projects. In contrary of that, aid causes debt entrapment, dependency, domination etc. to the third world country like Bangladesh.

NGOs and humanitarian organizational structures are flexible. Organizational size, staff and volunteer workforce can quickly expand or contract to accommodate the mission at hand. This enables service delivery at a much lower cost than most governments, private sector and multi-lateral agencies can provide. NGOs and humanitarian organizations work at the grassroots level so while government may have the primary role of planning and managing all aspects of the disaster NGOs and humanitarian organizational can supplement these initiatives by helping people understand their rights and focusing on specific issues that assist vulnerable populations. This bottom up community based approached can accelerate the whole community’s recovery post disaster.

According to Ahasan, Abu, and Katy (13), NGOs or non-governmental organizations are settings staffed by volunteers and altruistic employees who work with missions of satisfying ideologies rather than ends of financial interests. Donors are the sources of the NGOs funding. NGOs are the best hope for the poorest people in the world since poverty is a global disaster and with their support, it is a stepping stone for the affected nations to eradicate poverty (Sandhya, 2). For the attainment of international goals, reduction of poverty is vital. The philosophy that underlies poverty alleviation programs is to handle matters of poverty in rural areas by endowing the poorest people in the world with training and productive assets to