The Election Of The United States

It doesn’t take a political expert to see that the 2000 presidential election between Bush and Gore was extremely illegitimate. This can be observed through the recount incident which took place in the state of Florida. Many people, especially seniors, felt that they had not voted for the right candidate, which was due to a confusing ballot setup. The ballots were called “butterfly ballots”. These ballots, as one could imagine, had candidates on either side which the voter could choose from. Seems simple enough, right? Unfortunately, that was not the case. The font on the ballots were extremely minuscule, as well as condensed. To add to that, the voter had to use a pin to make a puncture next to their selection. Some people, who were either

In this country, we hold elections every four years to select the president. The founding fathers of our country established the electoral college to give the original thirteen states a fair voice in the election process. This country electoral called the electoral college into question on more the one occasion. In the most recent election, President-elect Donald Trump won the electoral vote over Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. This election has sent the country into an uproar and citizens of the United States are now challenging the legitimacy of the electoral college process. This paper will examine whether this process is reliable and valid when choosing the leadership of this country.

The 1980 presidential election of the United States featured three primary candidates, Republican Ronald Reagan, Democrat Jimmy Carter and liberal Republican John Anderson. Ronald Reagan was the governor of California before he decided to run for the presidency. John Anderson was a representative in Illinois and Carter was the incumbent. The lengthy Iran hostage crisis sharpened public opinions by the beginning of the election season. In the 1970s, the United States were experiencing a straining episode of low economic growth, high price increases and interest rates and an irregular energy crisis. The sense of discomfort in both domestic and foreign affairs in the nation were heading downward, this added to the downward spiral that was already going on. Between Carter, Anderson and Reagan, the general election campaign of the 1980s seemed more concerned with shadowboxing around political issues rather than a serious discussion of the issues that concerned voters.

Five of the fifty-eight total United States Presidential elections in history have ended in discrepancies between the popular vote and the electoral vote; on average, the president elected into office was not actually favored by the majority of Americans almost ten percent of the time. We need to acknowledge the fact that this, along with the Electoral College system as a whole, undermines our foundation in democracy. Additionally, the Electoral College is based in slavery and oppression and is therefore not indicative of the social progress that America has made since the Constitution’s ratification. Because of this, I am proposing an amendment to eradicate the Electoral College and instead elect presidents by direct popular vote. This would end an antiquated, obsolete, and arguably undemocratic practice that continues to plague us despite centuries of progress as a nation.

Throughout the past presidential election, and many others, the ideal of electing the president by popular vote has been at an all-time high conversation topic compared to previous years. While many argue that the Electoral College defeats the purpose of voting, and diminishes the majority’s voice, this is certainly not the case. Without the Electoral College, elections would quickly become, and encourage, radical and corrupt ways in their voting systems, that could possibly result in a detrimental nationwide political crisis of voter fraud, and a rise to direct democracy.

Some people believe that this system causes more problems to arise as well as more chaos. In the 2000 Presidential Election, Al Gore won the popular vote, though he did not not win the election. This concerned many americans, as they accused the election of voter fraud and disenfranchisement (Doc 5). This resulted in several court cases as well as recounts (Doc 6). For these reasons, many citizens believe that the Electoral College may need to make some changes when it comes to just how much power they withhold in the election.

The nominee who acquires the highest number of votes on a nationwide scale is declared the winner of the national popular vote. However, the victor of the national popular vote could still transpire being defeated within the election, in the same manner as Hilary Clinton in 2016 and Al Gore in 2000. By gaining Florida’s votes, Bush closely attained the electoral vote above Gore by way of 271 to 266—merely one more over than the required minimum of 270 “winner-take-all” electors. Then again Gore did win the popular vote over Bush by approximately 500,000 votes, the first flip over of the electoral and popular vote ever since 1888. This is because although Americans clearly vote in favor of their preferred nominee in the Presidential election, the Electoral College institution elects the president. Successively the founding fathers compromised the Electoral College within the U.S. Constitution allotting every state with as many votes as it has members the President is not elected during the course of a national popular vote. The procedure was crafted as a medium terrain in the deliberation over whether voters or Congress would possess dominance to vote for the President. Currently when nominating the President through a national popular vote there certainly still is support, removing the procedure of assigning electors between the stated by means

The United States, well known for its democracy, holds elections every four years to elect its President. Every American citizen over the age of 18 has a right to cast a vote in the presidential election. The voting process, although it seems easy and straightforward, can be very complicated. In the 2000 election, Al Gore captured the majority of votes, but George Bush won. The reason for this strange outcome and why Al Gore lost was because of the Electoral College. The Electoral College is voting system where different states are given a certain amount of votes in the election, and which ever candidate wins a state, is given that state’s votes. The Electoral College is out of date, and should be replaced by the Popular Vote system,

Since the fiasco that was the Presidential Election in the year 2000, many Americans have been calling for a reform of the Electoral College. Most of these people were Gore supporters; disillusioned by the fact that Bush won the office of the President while, in fact, he lost the popular vote. The American people did not elect George W. Bush; the Electoral College did.

Beginning at the time the Electoral College was put into place, many debated over its pros and cons. As time has gone on, more and more people have begun to show support for a change in the system (Saad 2013). After George W. Bush defeated AL Gore in the 2000 election by losing popular vote, but winning the college, leading to a “legal recount contest”, many began to question the fairness of the college (Cohen, 2010). This marked the “third time in the nation’s history” the less popular candidate has taken office (Longley). However, the Electoral College should remain in place because it ensures the continuation of a Representative Democracy, maintains a two party system, and because currently no plausible plan has been produced as a means

Voting to elect government officials is a privilege of a democratic society. Every four years, in one of the most important events in U.S politics, millions of American citizens exercise their voting power by casting a ballot for a presidential candidate. However, these millions of cast votes elect a small group of state representatives known as the Electoral College, not the president of the United States. Under the current voting system the power to elect the president is solely the responsibility of the Electoral College not the people. Although the Electoral College has a rich history, it is an outdated voting system and should be replaced by National Popular Vote.

So, about this week. First things first, I got jury duty for Massachusetts, yet I do not live in Massachusetts, I got a pretty good internship offer from a solid company, and I got to visit my friends in the NJ/NY area. A pretty average week except for the fact that there was an election on Tuesday. An election which held the entire country in a state of shock and awe. An election that was not supposed to happen this way. By nearly all accounts, we were supposed to going into Wednesday with our first female president, a Democratic Senate, and legal weed in a lot more areas of the country. We ended up getting only one of those things.

Did you vote in the last election? Do you know anything about the people who were running? One of the main reasons why so many Americans don’t vote is because they think that their vote doesn’t matter or won’t make that much of a difference. The reality is this is not true, the lack of understanding also plays a role is why some people just don’t vote. After all, the next president doesn’t just get picked overnight. The process is very long and complicated, it includes three major issues which are touched on by several candidates coming from two different parties.

The controversial presidential election of 2000, Al Gore won a majority of the popular vote, but he did not win the electoral college votes. George W. Bush won the presidency that year and Americans began to question the abolishment of the Electoral College (Wilcox 1). The identical problem reappeared during the 2016 presidential election, when Donald Trump lost the popular vote to Hillary Clinton by over 2.8 million votes, but he earned 74 votes more votes than Hillary Clinton in the Electoral College, which resulted in Donald Trump becoming the 45th president of The United States of America. Popular votes in the presidential election are more adequate and civil for The United States of America because the people are casting a vote directly for the possible future president rather than casting a vote to the electors of each state.

It was December 2018. The people of Israel and Palestine grew weary with the violence. Palestinians regained the land they once possessed in the West Bank and Gaza. Negotiation was tough, but it is to most people’s delight that 2 years later the violence has slowly began to terminate. The next question is how Israel moves on from all the violence, and chaos. The upcoming elections become a key factor in Israel’s future condition.