The Electoral College System Is Not Effective

Some people may believe that having the electoral college takes away the rights and needs of the states, but it does the complete opposite; it allows the president to meet the state’s needs and give them the power that is promised “The Electoral College makes sure that the states count in the presidential elections. As such, it is an important part of our federalist system...”(Document C). Document C shows us that the states are represented and have been represented for centuries due the to system in which certain powers are given to the states in order to keep the federal government in check. Consequently our states rely on the Electoral College to

Your vote should mainly matter! Yes, the electoral college should be abolished. The delegates did not believe the president should be chosen by a direct population vote (of the people). They didn’t trust voters would have enough information to make a good choice. The Electoral College is where the president and vice president are chosen indirectly. This system is where all states and the District of Columbia get one electoral vote for each of their US senators and representatives. Also, each state has a slate of electors for each presidential candidate. Another way this system works is by winner-take all method. The winner-take all method is where whichever candidate wins the most votes in the state, wins the state electoral votes. Lastly a candidate must receive a majority (one more than a half) of the electoral votes to be declared president. That is how everything goes in the electoral college. The electoral college should be abolished because 12 states and D.C. total have double the amount of electoral votes but less people than Illinois. Also, the winner of the 1876 presidential election isn’t what people wanted, it was based on the number of electoral votes. Another reason the electoral college should be abolished is that the states with the same representatives dont have the same number of voters. All these issues that continue to happen, need to be resolved by getting rid of this system.

A change in the Electoral college should be the number of electoral votes for each state's. Now they are based on the population, for example the Electoral Vote chart shows the higher the population in each state the more electoral votes that state has. The less populated states have less Electoral votes than the bigger more populated states. (Doc. 2) This shows that the less populated a state is the less say the have with the voting. Each state needs to have the same number so that it is appointed accurately. This majority would help with which state and show that more of the population chose a certain candidate.

As citizens of the United State of America, one of our most important rights is that of which to vote. By voting, the general population has a say in who its leaders are. Votes for local, state, and even federal representatives directly reflect who the constituents want in office. However, America’s highest office is not elected by a vote of the people. Instead we use a confusing and outdated system called the Electoral College. Our president is not elected by the people, but by 538 electors who can legally vote for whomever they choose. Several times in our nations history an elector has voted against the people’s will. Three presidents have been elected into office by the electoral college and

Should the Electoral College be preserved or replaced? A question monopolizing all of us. The Electoral College has been around 1788 and American democracy would be far stronger without it. This form of representation is old, and on behalf of the U.S., we need an improved portrayal of the citizens that accounts for our updated uses of technology. The Electoral College underrepresents states and allows some votes to count more than others. Rather than providing a true democracy we elect “Electors” to vote in our favor. This is unreliable and doesn’t account for those who don’t vote.to Electoral College The Electoral College was created by “Framers” also known as our Founding Fathers. This system is made up of 538 electors, or delegates, who

Activists and politicians alike have argued that the popular vote of the people should determine the President. However, more than 700 attempts to revise the constitution and do away with Electoral College have been denied. It is argued that if it was a direct vote then give power to individual states and put them on the Presidential campaign trail. “It takes 270 electoral votes out of 538 total votes in the college to win the presidency. That total equals the number of members each state has in both houses of Congress, with the District of Columbia getting three of its own.”

The Constitution Convention of 1787 gave birth to the system of Electoral College. According to the Constitution, electors per state are equal to the number of seats each state holds in the Congress, which include the Senate and the House of Representative delegations. California holds the most Electoral which is 54 electors. However, with every census the numbers of each states electoral change due to the process called reapportionment. Reapportionment can be defined as the “the process by which congressional districts are redrawn and seats are redistributed among states in the house ; reapportionment occurs every ten years.” The Electoral College should not be preserved because it is unfair due to the fact that candidates who do not win plurality of the votes can still get electoral votes. It is unfair to depend on the 538 Electors to become the voice of three hundred and nineteen million people.

The main Idea of the matter, is that the people need a better system to which to elect the president. What I am seeking is that our congressmen change the system, to better fit the time that we live in now. Where so many civil moments have occurred to give us more rights and privileges than ever before. These are just some of the reasons why I believe that the electoral college is outdated and should be changed, or done away with completely.

But as we cleared what was one of the biggest hurdles that forced the creation of the electoral college (Lack of technology to keep up with politics and candidates effectively), there is no purpose of one. Too many times has this system that is supposed to fairly decide our president failed because presidents won despite American people voting for their opponent. This system is proven to be inherently flawed, and especially after this election it is time to consider a new system of election our next presidents. When we put our faith in mysterious electors who aren’t even obligated to respect our voting preference, we lose an integral piece of democracy. We lose the voice of the

The United States Constitution Twelfth Amendment, Article II, speaks that“each States shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress.” The total number of electoral college in the country is 538. This includes the number of representative which is 435, plus 100 the number of senators; since the country has 50 states, each State received equal amount of senators which is 2 but the number of representative are best on the population live in that State. The extra 3 is for the district of columbia, which is washington D.C. In order to be a president, someone must have 270 electoral votes. This simple means that the tuesday after the first monday in November every four years, people do not votes for the president but they vote for electors who will votes for the president the Monday after the second Wednesday in December of the same year. Different time in history the presents has won the popular votes but because of the electoral college they end up lose the election. As one can see, this is a serious dilemma that need a change in the constitution. Although this plan seems like a good plan because it has been used in the country for many years; however it has weaknesses that has affect the U.S presidential votes more than one time in the history.

The electoral college should be kept. Five times has a candidate won the electoral vote without the popular. The most recent being our last election. Each time, it sparks a debate on whether or not to do away with this system of voting. In fact, there have been 700 proposals in the last 200 years to get rid of, or modify the electoral college.

The electoral college can be difficult to understand, especially when they say “every vote counts”, but the popular vote is not what decides who is president; instead, it only influences the electoral vote. Those who have been elected to cast the electoral vote take into account of who won the popular vote in the state, and then, 48 out of the 50 states use the “winner-take-all” system to vote for the appropriate candidate that won in their state. At times, the Electoral College is not the one to determine the next president. There are times when the election is passed over to the House of Representatives, where the next president will be selected. The Electoral College is undemocratic, over represents the small states, and gives no chance to third parties; therefore, it should be abolished.

Voting to elect government officials is a privilege of a democratic society. Every four years, in one of the most important events in U.S politics, millions of American citizens exercise their voting power by casting a ballot for a presidential candidate. However, these millions of cast votes elect a small group of state representatives known as the Electoral College, not the president of the United States. Under the current voting system the power to elect the president is solely the responsibility of the Electoral College not the people. Although the Electoral College has a rich history, it is an outdated voting system and should be replaced by National Popular Vote.

Many believe the electoral college’s votes protect the states that have small populations from the large populations states and in turn candidates will have to give more attention to small states. If this was true it is being executed horrifically. Candidates are visiting, advertising, and campaigning more and more in swing states. In other words, the electoral college doesn’t make candidates care about small states, or even big states.

Many believe the Electoral College’s votes protect the states that have small populations from the large populations states and in turn candidates will have to give more attention to small states. If this was true, it is being executed horrifically. Candidates are visiting, advertising, and campaigning more and more in swing states. In other words, the electoral college doesn’t make candidates care about small states, or even big states.