The Emancipation Proclamation has two points of views from highly qualified professors if the Emancipation was to free the slaves or not. The first Professor is Mr. Allen C. Guelzo and the other professor is Vincent Harding. Mr. Allen proposed that Abraham used the Emancipation Proclamation to free the slaves. However, Mr. Harding used his research and insisted that no the Emancipation Proclamation was not to free the slaves. On the other hand, Mr. Allen makes some well-revised statements, but Mr. Harding has facts and evidence that supports the idea that the Emancipation Proclamation wasn’t to free the slaves, but for other purposes. Mr. Guelzo was convinced that Mr. Lincoln was a hundred percent committed about freeing the slaves. Basically, the Emancipation Proclamation was to release the slaves, but on the other hand, it wasn’t. Mr. Harding however, insisted that Abraham Lincoln had no intention in releasing the slaves during his presidential years. Although, he initially refused to declare war of the destruction of slaves and then afterwards, he issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which ironically did not free any slaves. The Civil War and Reconstruction period occurred in the 1860-1877. As the years went by, the people were convinced that the Civil war was not exclusively about slavery, but something else. A majority of people from the South stated the fact that they were fighting for their states ' rights. They believed that the government should not govern them.
The reconstruction period followed after the Civil War which was caused by the abolishment of slavery and many other contributing factors. Most scholars believe that this period was the political uprising at a national level. The debate started in December 1863, President Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation was issued to weaken the Confederate side. Nevertheless, the reconstruction period was to rebuild the new United States and government. ECONOMIC IMPACTS Most of the Confederate soldiers were left homeless after the war.
1) What is the Emancipation Proclamation? When is Baldwin’s letter written and what is the significance of the timing of his letter (specifically: what is the situation of African Americans at the time Baldwin wrote the letter?)
The civil war was a bloody time for America and left the country in shambles. America needed some rebuilding. This period was called the Reconstruction period. This period lasted from 1866 through 1877. The reconstruction period was the time of reconnecting southern states back into the union and welcoming the now freedmen as American citizens. Northern neglect killed the process of reconnecting these 11 states that left the union.
American Citizens may have questioned or still do question if Abraham Lincoln was “The Great Emancipator” or “Just another politician,” The people who consider Lincoln as just another politician think that he only issued the Emancipation Proclamation as a war time strategy. Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1,1863 and this document allowed all slaves to be free. Lincoln was the one who allowed the slaves to be free so he deserves the title of “The Great Emancipator.”
Abraham Lincoln didn’t necessary write the Emancipation Proclamation just because he believed that it was wrong to have slavery to be legal. He issued the Emancipation Proclamation so that mayhem would occur in the southern slave states. Lincoln created a purpose for the Union army to fight and that was to free the slaves. One part of the Emancipation Proclamation that many people don’t know is that Abraham Lincoln only applied the Emancipation Proclamation to the states that were apart of the rebellion. Another reason Lincoln wrote the Emancipation Proclamation was to try and stop any other foreign countries from joining in on the side of the Confederacy. The Emancipation Proclamation also gave the African Americans great motivation to fight for their own
As Mr. Douglass stated in the October 1862 issue of his newspaper, “The effect of this paper...changes the character of the war in European eyes and gives it an important principle...instead of national pride and interest” (Dudley 167). This quote shows that the Emancipation Proclamation would open the eyes of European nations and show them that the Union and Confederacy are not fighting because they had a simple disagreement and are being petty, but rather that they are passionately fighting for what they each believe to be righteous. Changing the views of a foreign nation is not something that could be done with a “worthless act” that people like Mr. Vallandigham believed the Emancipation Proclamation to be. Another statement made by Mr. Douglass goes to show how the Proclamation would have affected the war greatly. As Mr. Douglass states, “It will disarm all purpose on the part of European Government to intervene in favor of the rebels and thus cast off... one source of rebel power” (Dudley 167). Mr. Vallandigham then states in his speech however that “Of what possible avail was his proclamation of September? Did the South submit? Was she even alarmed?” (Dudley 169). One should see that Mr. Douglass’ statement disproves Mr. Vallandigham’s because the South would indeed be alarmed by the Proclamation due to its
The Emancipation Proclamation was a document published by Lincoln on the first day of 1863. This document was a huge moment in American history as it pretty much changed the point of conflict in the Civil War. The purpose of the Proclamation was to free all slaves in the rebelling states otherwise known as the Confederates or the South. This was a strategic move made by Abe that shifted not only the war but also sped up the process of the abolition of slavery in America. This essay will not only analyze the document itself but also the legacy, social and legal implications, and long-lasting effects it had on America.
In the years prior to 1862 and 1863, many people were calling on President Lincoln for the emancipation of the slaves. Many felt that slavery would be the evil that would bring the country down. But at that time Lincoln didn't think it wise to emancipate them
The Civil war could very easily be known as one of the greatest tragedies in United States history. After the Civil War, the people of The United States had so much anger and hatred towards each other and the government that 11 Southern states seceded from the Nation and parted into two pieces. The Nation split into either the Northern abolitionist or the Southern planation farmers. The Reconstruction era was meant to be exactly how the name announces it to be. It was a time for the United States to fix the broken pieces the war had caused allowing the country to mend together and unite once again. The point of Reconstruction was to establish unity between the states and to also create and protect the civil rights of the former slaves.
January 1, 1863 President Abraham Lincoln changed the face of America by declaring all slaves to be freed, this was known as the Emancipation Proclamation. In our country 's history the Proclamation can be argued as one of the most groundbreaking change that shaped how our country operates today.
Following the Civil War, the Reconstruction Era began. During this time, the southern part of the United States attempted a transformation directed by Congress from 1863 to 1877. Known for its successes and failures, the Reconstruction was a time of great pain and an infinite amount of questions. As well as many long term, short term, positive, negative, social, and political effects.
On September 22, 1862, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, issued the first, or preliminary, Emancipation Proclamation. In this document he warned that unless the states of the Confederacy returned to the Union by January 1, 1863, he would declare their slaves to be “forever free.” During the Civil War, he was fighting to save the Union and trying not to free the slaves. Lincoln was quoted to say, “I am not, nor have ever been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races.” The Emancipation Proclamation illustrated this view.
Although there were more than four million slaves living in the U.S. at this time, the Emancipation Proclamation did not formally free a single one of them. So that presents us with a couple of very interesting questions: first, why did Lincoln issue the proclamation if it had no practical effect? Second, why is the Emancipation Proclamation considered Lincoln's most important legacy if it didn't actually free anyone?
Reconstruction was the time period following the Civil War, which lasted from 1865 to 1877, in which the United States began to rebuild. The term can also refer to the process the federal government used to readmit the defeated Confederate states to the Union. While all aspects of Reconstruction were not successful, the main goal of the time period was carried out, making Reconstruction over all successful. During this time, the Confederate states were readmitted to the Union, the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendments were ratified, and African Americans were freed from slavery and able to start new lives.
Abraham Lincln was the one who signed the Emancipation Proclamation on the first of January in 1863, which did not technically free all slaves, but made emancipation the new long term goal of the Union war effort. Although, some slaves were set free, a new party evolved. Racism became the sruggle for the freed slaves, so life didn’t become easier for the slaves after the emancipation.