preview

The End Of Spam Shame Summary

Decent Essays

Essay 1: Comparative Analysis Materialism is a grievous ailment that many Americans suffer from as a result of America’s grand consumer culture. While materialism is indeed associated with negative connotations, commodities have different cultural influences on certain social groups. For example, a commodity well known to the Asian-American community is Spam. In the 2011 article, “The End of Spam Shame: On Class, Colonialism, and Canned Meat”, Sylvie Kim reminisces over the shame she had for her love of Spam. She draws in connections between Spam and American imperialism to demonstrate to her fellow Asian Americans that they should not be ashamed of their love for Spam as it represents their identity. While a history professor of Wisconson-Madison, …show more content…

Enstad mentions words such as “invisible” (57, 58), “unanticipated” (61), and “threaten” (60). These words indicate the unknown which stirs a sense of terror among her readers. The unknown remains a mystery, and there is no way to predict its movements. By doing so, she underscores the direness of the spread of this toxicity by pushing against this fear. Enstad even blatantly acknowledges the emotions she’s evoking by jeering that after reading her essay, readers might want to “sanitize one’s own environment” (63). As an author, she empathizes with her audience’s thoughts on her essay which allows her to relate to her audience thus, igniting a need to take charge and further analyze this toxicity that plagues Americans. It is common for a community of people to begin scrambling for solutions to an issue when the danger is imminent compared to a future problem. On the other hand, Kim’s article not only brings together a community for a common cause like Enstad’s but, she appeals to a different emotion through her use of a history strand. Kim’s history strand consists of phrases such as “imperialism” (3), “political turmoil” (4), and “immigrant” (4). She motivates her Asian American audience to unite due to the shared histories of the community. The cultural roots of Asian Americans are not often portrayed in American media and is not commonly discussed. Kim …show more content…

Enstad claims that toxicity is “by no means equal or democratic” which immediately clashes with American values of equality (57). Americans could perceive this as unjust and become outraged. This will pave way for the acknowledgement of Enstad’s message and the will to take action. Enstad uses words such as “capitalism” (57), and “profit” (59) in multiple instances. Capitalism and profit often go hand in hand and can have a negative or positive connotation depending on the situation. In this case, Enstad insinuates that it is a menace to American society even with its prominence in American culture. Not only does Enstad mention words usually tied to modern America however, she coyly slips in words that reminds Americans of their history. For example, Enstad recognizes globalization’s “manifestions” (58) and the “isolation” (60) of the studies of culture and toxicity. The idea of Manifest Destiny comes to mind. Manifest Destiny was a belief held by Americans that it was their destiny to spread further in to the western part of North America. This is similar to the idea that globalization is helping toxins achieve their “Manifest Destiny”. Isolation brings Americans back to World War II. After the gruesome battles in World War I, the United States decided to stay out of World War II. Despite their decision, they decided to intervene and aid the Allies in the

Get Access