The End Of The Cold War

The Cold War was the name given to the political economic, military and ideological contention that occurred between the United States and its allies and the Soviet Union and their allies after World War II. The two forces never directly engaged in military activity in light of the fact that both had atomic weapons that if utilized, might have had crushing outcomes for both sides. Instead, proxy wars were battled. A proxy war results when contradicting forces utilize outsiders as substitutes for battling each one other and is ordinarily launched by a power that does not itself partake. The Korean and Vietnam wars are two examples of proxy wars on the grounds that the U.S. and the Soviet Union did not directly engage one another however, Soviet endeavors to spread and bring together both Korea and Vietnam under communist rule provoked mediation either by the United States and/or by their allies. These two occasions were simply a few of the impacts of the Cold War in Asia. This paper will examine each war individually and in more detail and endeavor to persuade that the Korean and Vietnam Wars were the immediate aftereffects of Soviet endeavors to expand communist influence in Asia and the United States and their allies' approach of forestalling and holding such endeavors.

For almost 15 years the U.S. has been in a constant state of war. Various terrorist organizations, from al-Quade, to the Taliban, and now Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) have maintained our focus so much so that we have almost forgotten about prior threats. Ten years prior to the start of the conflict in the Middle East, the Cold War had officially concluded, ending almost 45 years of server political and military tensions between the U.S. and Russian following WWII. During this period of time, Russia was the central focus of the U.S., although China and North Korea also posed a significant threat. While terrorist threats and activates remain a significant threat, Russia recent annexation of Crimea proves that they are still a very

In 1945 after WWII the United States and the Soviet Union became divided as far as how they felt Europe should be divided. This began the period of conflict called the Cold War. The Cold War was “a state of political hostility between countries characterized by threats, propaganda, and other measures short of open warfare”(dictionary.com).The USSR believed in communism, where the US believed in democracy. The US was between two potentially hostile nations, the US designed a Buffer Zone to prevent any overt acts of aggression.At the end of WWI,I almost all of the eastern European countries were occupied by Russia these countries were known as Satellite States. The distrust between the two nations began at the Yalta Conference which included the three big powers: Churchill (Great Britain),Stalin (Soviet Union), and Roosevelt (United States of America). Stalin wanted more control as far how Europe progressed after WWII, where Roosevelt believed Europe should hold free election and determine their political system and rivalry between the two superpowers and began the Cold War. Some might blame the Americans for the causing for the Cold War because of the American’s wanted to occupy the countries, but the Soviet Union bares the responsibility for the Cold War because of their actions in Eastern Europe, by the military expansionism of Stalin and his successors, and the principles presented in the Iron Curtain Speech .

From the Roman Empire to modern day America one issue has plighted all of history: income inequality. Income inequality is when there is a noticeable and evident gap in which income is distributed unevenly between the rich and the poor. We can particularly see income inequality playing a major role in the foundations of the French Revolution and we can see income inequality starting to transcend into becoming a real problem for America today, namely due to a practice of neoliberalism in the American economy. The solution to fixing the American economy would be to start a process of regulation of the economy and funding of social programs.

To some, "capitalistic democracy" conjures up the picture of a utopia where the free market is accompanied by individual liberty and social justice. To others, however, the term is more like a paradox—despite tremendous economic power, the advanced industrial nations are not immune from the evils of socio-political inequality as well as economical disparity. Amongst the capitalist democracies of the world, it is an established and well-known fact that when compared with the advanced industrial countries in Europe, the United States has the worst condition of economical-political inequality and social injustice. Its government is the least progressive, and

The classical liberal ideology emerged as a result of the Enlightenment period, which brought about new philosophies, challenging the existing assumptions about the nature of humankind and society. Modern liberalism developed around 1870 as a result of both philosophical and practical changes, including mass industrialisation. Classical liberals argue that modern liberalism has broken the principles of doctrines central to liberal thought whilst modern liberals claim that they are simply adapting and building on classical liberalist ideas. This essay will discuss the extent to which modern liberalism departs from classical liberalisms by analysing approaches to the size of the state, democracy and the concept of freedom and aims to justify

Despite its name, the Cold War did not actually involve military fighting between the United States and the Soviet Union. However, the Cold War is still an excellent example as to why war can be a result of bargaining failures and explains reasons as to why war occurs. A single person’s rationality can tip the scale between war and peace. The Cold War was essentially a deadlock between the two super powers of that time, the United States and the Soviet Union. Both states expressed desire to maintain and widen their respective spheres of influence around the world. Both states also wanted to prove that their political system is superior; whereas the United States was pro-democracy, the Soviet Union was pro-communism. Although the Cold War was a result of many factor, war can definitely occur due to information problems between two states. Nonetheless, I do believe there is always a range of agreements that is possible between states, as is evidenced by the resolution of the Cuban missile crisis.

The end of the Cold War impacted many changes in U.S. and Department of Defense (DoD) policies, but it had almost no impact on Army intelligence interrogations. Army interrogators conducted intelligence interrogations in force on force conflicts because interrogations were a wartime task. The applicable policies and regulations for conventional warfare interrogations were still valid thus requiring minimal to no changes for Army doctrinal and national policies after the Cold War. The Geneva Conventions outlined the treatment of people in conflicts that ranged from protected persons to enemy prisoners of war. Army doctrine on interrogations and law of land and war were written in a way that complies with the Genevan Conventions and other

The end of the Cold War brought about the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe, paving the way for an unprecedented new paradigm – one characterised by the end of hostilities between the two dominant ideologies: Soviet communism and American liberal capitalism. This dominant new paradigm encouraged the homogenisation of ideas, in the form of exchanging ethos and values along former cultural, ideological and geographical divides. As such, this integration of world societies has earned the title ‘globalisation’, forcing the global community to appear so united as to warrant the metaphor of a global village. (Note: This paragraph pains me to read – I will eventually re-write it.)

The United Nations was handed the sacred duty of, in its own words, “to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war.” While the UN was able to prevent another great war, and to an extent other large regional wars, it has still not met its key tenet of saving generations from the scourge of war. I believe that the UN has failed to promote peace successfully in the world, and its job as facilitator of peace hasn’t been met when countless conflicts have continued all over the globe. I believe that the UN has failed to promote world peace because, it has failed to create a system where collective security is followed by member states, it has failed to create a formula where peacekeeping can work successfully and consistently, and has

In the first article, “Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising” by OCED, the author approaches the topic of social welfare using a reluctant collectivist approach, at the same time, still suggesting for other variations. The author explains his opinion regarding the importance of social welfare for the overall well-being of the economy, as it supports the ongoing free-market characteristic of the economy. The author describes the rising issue of income inequality and poverty in the international economy as “People will no longer support open trade and free markets if they feel that they are losing out while a small group of winners is getting richer and richer” (OECD, 2011). To further elaborate, the issue of income inequality is caused by an individual’s educational background. The importance of education is significant as it reduces inequality since many businesses/companies want to hire employees that are highly qualified and have demanding skills. This in turn leads to an increased gap between the rich and the poor due to unequal wage distribution as the

Neo-liberalism is a political ideology that suggests that ‘human well-being can be advanced by the maximisation of entrepreneurial freedom, characterised by private property rights, individual liberty, free markets and free trade’ (Geografiskar, A 2006). In today’s modern society neo-liberalism is widespread around the globe with various stakeholders offering conflicting views. Some advocates, namely the capitalistic portion of society argue that a liberal market is

The four ways of wealth distribution happen through a number of neoliberal economic polices. Brown specifies the polices such as deregulation of industry and capital flows, reduction in welfare (state provisions and protection), privatized and outsourced public goods, regressive tax and removal of tariffs and end of wealth distribution (28). She suggests that such policies result four major effects: intensified inequality, crass or unethical commercialization, growing relationship between corporate and financial capital with the state and economic havoc (Brown 28-30).

Over the last forty years, neoliberal capitalism has constructed a new global stage based on the principles of the free market and supply-side economics. It has ingrained itself into the economic and political identity of globalization so much so that it seems like the world would fall apart without its strong hand guiding the human race towards individual sovereignty and economic freedom, or at least this is what TNCS and World Bank would like people to believe. Conservative thinkers would agree whole heartedly with the assessment that neoliberal capitalism has improved the world; in fact, it is there primary ideology. But liberal thinkers would find many flaws in the free market system, and even further, radical thinkers would want the eradication of the neoliberal market all together (Rouse 2016).

Like a wave, largely in reaction to a current economic crisis, the idealogy, governance, and policies of society have vacillated over time, as economists adopted new stances to correct the economic ills of the day. When classic liberalism, a laisse faire approach espousing freedom of the market, failed, Keynesian egalitarian liberalism successfully promoted market