preview

The Epa's Mercury Problem By Susan Brown

Decent Essays

With the well-being of future generations in mind, environmental concerns have begun to establish a permanent residence atop the priority ladder for a vast array of Americans. Consequently, writers and political pundits alike are seizing this opportunity to capitalize on advocating their stance on the issue. Information, representing all positions, pours in at an unrelenting and unfathomable rate. For the average American it can be an arduous process sifting through all the rhetoric in attempt to find the real truth regarding our impact as humans on the environment; one such example is Susan Brown’s article The EPA’s Mercury Problem. In this article Brown attempts to expose hypocrisy among progressives by paralleling the Environmental Protection …show more content…

While at first the sarcasm may be to lighten the mood and make her seem relatable, the harsh ridicule of the progressive party and their supporters really starts to depreciate her credibility. At first glance, the humorous way she describes the experience of hauling off all the CFLs she’s just recently changed in her home to the recycling center makes her appear to be just another likable character in a story. However, when brass hasty generalizations are made such as, “I’ve always believed Progressives love the planet, but hate the people who live on it”, it really starts to diminish any likability that she has created. Accusing a specific populous of human hatred is callous and very narrow minded. By now any one close to the middle and leftwards has already written her off and any opinions she has to offer. Another example is the ridicule of the EPA’s Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) that limits mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants. She says the EPA promises MATS will raise kids’ IZs, prevent a substantial amount of premature deaths, reduce heart attacks, and lessen childhood asthma”, she follows this up with, “I’d settle for weight control and whiter teeth”. Whether or not you believe MATS would actually do all these things, it seems pitiless to joke about matters that are so consequential to people from all walks of life. It also reveals contradiction in her reasoning. She rid her home of CFLs because they were hazardous to her family’s health. Yet the EPA’s MATS rule is purely a political move to kill jobs and have us “rubbing sticks together to food”. She either believes mercury is dangerous, hence ridding her home of CFLs, or she doesn’t believe they’re dangerous and the EPA is simply lining their

Get Access