preview

The Epic Of Gilgamesh : A Hero As A Hero

Satisfactory Essays

Gilgamesh blurs the line between hero and antihero. However, his status as an ascended being is a substantial basis in which his classification of a hero should be based upon – coinciding with a typical mythological interpretation. “Two-thirds of him was divine, one-third of him was human…” (Epic of Gilgamesh 100). This superhuman nature elevates Gilgamesh above the common man to hero status. However, this nature also leads to his tragic downfall, where surely, he brings upon his own fate. Lusting for immortality, Gilgamesh initially seeks out the principle of immortality: to live on in language and in legend. He decides to do this after observing mortality, stating “Since no man can avoid life’s end, I would enter the mountain land and setup my name” (96). This lust, even after Enkidu’s appearance, remains ceaseless as Gilgamesh attempts to find a cure for mortality in a plant, only for it to be usurped by a serpent. Gilgamesh exclaims “For whom has my heart’s blood been poured out? For myself I have obtained no benefit…” (150) which exposes his true folly. This folly along with his incessant desire for conflict poses the greatest threat to Gilgamesh’s status as a hero. Even though heroic actions and individuals typically have positive tendencies, the ethos of oneself should not be the sole determinant. This being the case, heroes can be interpreted, outside of a mythological interpretation, simply as individuals who have faced and overcame a great struggle – whether that

Get Access