The Era Of The Common Man

These are just a few examples of how Jackson's past may have contributed greatly to his presidency; he had hatred towards many rivals and not to mention the British. Another soon to be rival on Jackson's list was John Quincy Adams; this was because in the election of 1824, Adams and Henry Clay made what Jackson called "a corrupt bargain" And this caused Jackson to lose the 1824 election which he believed he had rightfully earned.

IN the Election of 1828 thier was a big emphasis on charecter. The country had just gone through the panic of 1819 and had just recovered. The election of 1828 was the first presidential contest where popular votes would determine thr outcome. The voters, not the state legislators chose the electors. Jackson ran against Adams who was considered a elitist and wanted to create a monarch. While Jackson was considered to care about the ordinary man. Jackson was a democrat, who was worried about the common man, running against the whigs who were considered to be have a top down style of running government. Valuing the rich and not caring about the por. Jackson offered new hospitality to the common man. This is why he was so liked by the people. Before this the rulers would not care at all about the struggling man only abuot big busineses. Once in office he

In what many have called the dirtiest presidential election ever, Andrew Jackson reigned supreme over John Quincy Adams in the election of 1828. For the first time in a political campaign, the main focus was to slander the reputation of the opponent. Issues seemed to be disregarded in favor of personal attacks upon the individual. The days of standing for office and remaining silent towards the American public before elections took place were over. The election of 1828 focused on insults, name calling, and heckling between the candidates and their parties.

Jackson supporters fought back, attacking Adams as an elitist aristocrat who broke the Sabboth and gambled with a billiard table he bought for the White House. Due to this enormous interest and heated emotions that the two parties stirred up during the campaign, more than three times as many Americans cast ballots in 1828 as compared to four years earlier. Lastly, Adams and Jacksons backgrounds were drastically different. Adams (representing the Democratic Republican party) came from a privileged family. He studied various arts and could speak several different languages. He served in the United States Senate and as the U.S. ambassador to Prussia, the Netherlands, Russia, and Great Britain. Jackson (representing the Democratic Party) on the other hand was Ill schooled and hardly able to learn the basics of spelling and grammar. He went from a frontier congressman, to senator, to state militia general, and a territorial

The Jacksonian period of 1824-1848 can also be celebrated as the era of the “common man” because it lived up to its expectations due to the impact it had on America’s politics. Jackson put

The Jacksonian democracy of the 1820s-1830s is often associated with an expansion of the political influence, economic opportunities, and social equality available to “the common man,” a concept of the masses which President Andrew Jackson and his newly founded Democratic party came to represent. The new administration certainly saw gains for the majority; namely, public participation in government increased to unprecedented levels, and several economic decisions were made to favor the people over monopolies. Beginning with their exaggerated portrayal of the “corrupt” 1824 election however, the Jacksonian democrats also left a legacy of substantial miscalculations

Jacksonian's viewed themselves as guardians of the constitution, political democracy, individual liberties, and equality of economic opportunity. Many of his followers from that time tended to agree but a lot of people today look back and disagree with each of these assumptions. I believe that he was a keeper of the constitution and political democracy. Depending upon your outlook, Jackson was a guardian of individual liberties, even with his oppression of African American slaves, Indians, and women. His equality of economic opportunity was more towards the common man that the elite but gave that common man a larger chance for equality with the elites without allowing the elites a greater chance to increase their wealth.

After the Battle of New Orleans, Andrew Jackson (“Old Hickory”) first became publicly recognized as a war hero and an Indian fighter. Very few people, if any, probably predicted he would one day become the president of the United States; but he did! In the election of 1828, Jackson campaigned as an authentic man of the people and was elected president by a landslide. During the campaign, Jacksonians created a new political party—the Democrats, the first modern one created, that supported Jackson and his run for office. Upon Jackson entering office, America saw the birth of a new era of mass democracy. Jacksonian Democrats viewed themselves as the guardians of the United States Constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and

Jackson, uneducated as he was, was a very shrewd man. Using the spoils system, he all but totally replaced the cabinet from the previous administration. By rewarding the men who had helped him reach his current state, he made it clear that the middleclass could improve their condition. The cabinet was no longer filled with wealthy men of status, but instead of more every day people.

Andrew Jackson, whose presidential term lasted from 1829-1837, was the first president to ever be chosen by the people to lead. Because he was not born into a rich family, people felt that they could relate to him better. He too preferred supporting the common public over the wealthy aristocrats. During Jackson’s period in office he was able to shift the majority of power in the United States to farmers and small businesses in the western part of the country. Jackson vetoed many bills in order to benefit common people and also created the spoils system to balance out his cabinet. Like Jefferson, Jackson was extremely opposed to the Bank of the U.S., believing that it would only make the wealthy even

Jackson was a supporter of the working class; he was viewed as a true liberal democratic. The Second Bank appeared to be monopolistic and aristocratic. This did not coincide with Jackson’s views on politics, economics, and society. Jackson did not

Although the “Age of Jackson” wasn’t a time era, which brought forth a great political, social, or economic freedom and equality to the U.S., it did in fact put our country through a metamorphosis in our political lives of the nation. The start of a new presidency (Jackson’s presidency) was accompanied by huge numbers of Hickoryites (Jacksonian supporters) and official hopefuls. Many of these hopefuls were granted their desire of holding office, which is one of the changes brought into Washington by Andrew Jackson.

The fact that Jackson made mistakes doesn’t really argue the point of whether he was a “common man” or not, it actually helps it. One of his flawed declarations was to veto the bill to renew the Bank of the United States. While this was argued to be unconstitutional, and just all around ridiculous, it displays Jackson’s commitment to the farmers and middle class of America, versus the wealthier and more knowledgeable men. Jackson also had a fierce sense of determination, which was shown when he disobeyed the ruling of John Marshall and the Supreme Court.

When Jackson came to power in 1829 he promised much, advocating equality, democratic change, morality in government and true representation. However Jackson's success or failure as a president is shown by what he actually did. The thesis of this essay is that despite the variety of issues faced by Jackson he didn't actually bring about much change. This could be interpreted as failure but his legacy as a strong president, as a symbol of US democracy, and also the devotion of the people to him, does perhaps counter the failings. Failure might constitute not meeting one's promises but Jackson's ambiguity and inconsistency on many issues make it hard to judge his performance. I would not say he was completely successful or unsuccessful but

Jackson, receiving the majority of the popular vote in the Election of 1824, had a skewed opinion of the American political system compared to Henry Clay’s more objective view; Andrew Jackson felt that he had been robbed of his presidency due to Clay’s ability to expertly manipulate the bureaucracy. Clay saw an opportunity to assist and elect a fellow Whig who would, in turn, institute his own political views as head of the executive branch. Obviously, after winning the popular vote, Jackson felt that the Electoral College had cheated him but representatives of the American public decided to elect Adams in his place after falling short of a majority decision.