Foreign Policy is the way a country goes about handling other countries in a variety of ways. This includes war efforts, foreign aid, and diplomatic policies. Foreign policy in a sense represents a countries wants and needs and uses strategies to achieve these goals with other countries. The power of foreign policy is split up between the Executive Branches and Congress. Although the President is the dominant force in foreign policy making congress does play key roles into the finalizing of foreign policy tools and even can manipulate laws which can change foreign policy in return. The process of foreign policy include first having a foreign issue arise, having policies debated and made, government deciding to adopt one policy, the policy gets …show more content…
The first of these three structures is diplomacy whereby the president deals with foreign policy on a more verbal level by negotiations and discussions. Often times the president may hold meetings at the White House where information regarding foreign policy is discussed. Diplomatic foreign affairs date back to the Revolutionary War of 1812 and still play an essential role in foreign policy in that it allows all voices, cultures, and opinions to be heard. Diplomates represent the United States in levels from foreign wars to cyber wars and not one is too little or too small to be effective. The president has full control on who that representative may be. A diplomat not only helps with representation but the appreciation of the other foreign diplomats who they must come in contact with. An example of diplomacy in foreign policy can be as simple as the exportation of U.S rice to countries like Japan and Korea. A diplomat has to not only know what’s right for our country and know our culture but also the foreigners culture and their perspective on what is most important to them. What they will most benefit from may be similar or the complete opposite from America. A successful diplomat would know that these countries have different internal subsidies which are used to protect local rice industries making imported rice too …show more content…
Although many are against military force each situation is unique in that there is no single set of fixed rules on when and when not military force should be used however it is up to the president to decide when the action is best to take place. A professor of Standford University has his philosophy of when military force is made , “when the stakes warrant, where and when force can be effective, where no other policies are likely to be effective, where its application can be limited in scope and time, and where the potential benefits justify the potential costs and sacrifice” (George 1) . When all other tools are used such as diplomacy efforts which include negotiations and foreign aid efforts the last result is to go about it with none other than military force. Our strategy here in America is to always work hard for peace and I believe the president does his job at that. However, the president is aware of attacks on us and it always ready for war if it be necessary. The most famous example of military force is the American attack on Japan when two atomic bombs were dropped on the small island. The bombing of Hiroshima happened in March of 1945 where more than 10,000 citizens of Japan had died. President Harry Truman at that time had demanded the five ton atomic bomb be dropped to speed up the ending of the war. It worked because soon after the Japanese
This third and most helpful definition focuses not only on outcome, but also, crucially, on norms and process. Values are essential to the study of foreign policy, and explain why the policies of different states can vary so dramatically. Means are equally important: what a country does can be less significant than how it does it, as recent US actions illustrate. Central to pluralism is the notion that the three branches of government should be separate and distinct, with each acting to check and balance the others and thus preventing abuse of power. In the United States, the often-tumultuous relationship between especially the legislative and executive branches has been the subject of much scholarship and debate. The Presidency has seen a slow but constant expansion of power since the days of George Washington, culminating in what Schlesinger has called the "imperial presidencies" of Johnson and Nixon, and continuing today. The official rights and duties of the President as regards foreign policy-making are actually only briefly mentioned in the Constitution, and are rather limited. The President "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur". However, presidents have frequently bypassed the need for congressional approval by enacting
The purpose of foreign policies is to help protect a country's national interests, economic prosperity, national security, and ideological goals. These goals can be achieved through peaceful cooperations between other nations, or through war, aggression, and exploitation. However, even with the division in power and struggle over foreign policy, I believe the president is the most dominant force in foreign policymaking, not the Congress. The president is the dominant force because the president has the power to personally deal with foreign countries while Congress asserts itself into foreign policy by being able to check on the president’s foreign policymaking decisions and decide whether it is acceptable or not; and I believe Congress should have this important role to check on the president’s foreign policy because of the potential reckless decisions the executive branch can make.
Foreign policy is how one nation deals with many other nations. The book talks about Ronald Regan trying to create foreign policy and then here you have congress like a bunch of ants floating on a log down river each ant thinking there in charge. Foreign policy from the way “How Congress Works’” says is set up by the president and not really. Having congress get involved makes foreign policy way more complicated then needed. Harry Truman was one man who was asked a question. A random person wanted to know who created foreign policy? His answer was that he did. Now this leads to a important example of foreign policy. This leads to John F. Kennedy and we all know what major foreign policy deal he had to deal with. It was the Cuban missile crisis.
The president is the foreign policy leader for the United States with an important political, military and economic role in the international arena. If there is collision between the president and congress, can congress restrain the president in foreign policy making?
The U.S. foreign policy has always been linked to the domestic policy since the U.S. never feared of expanding its national interests over the national boarders. Isolation for the U.S. usually implied slow economic growth and the large number of destructive conflicts within, while impudent foreign policy always guaranteed an abrupt economic growth for the U.S. economy. After the U.S. intervened in the WWI and the WWII, the U.S. economy witnessed a tremendous economic growth, nearly elimination of the unemployment, rapid urbanization and overall growth of the standards of living across the country. Decisive foreign policy has always been providing the U.S. economy with the sustainable and rapid economic growth, unlike the policy aimed at isolation of the U.S.
The U.S. Constitution gives both, legislative and executive branches a role in foreign policy powers. However, it contains some ambiguities regarding these duties of Congress and the President. Yet, as exclusive powers are given merely to Congress, this reveals the weight it holds. Only Congress can declare war, regulate commerce with foreign nations, raise and support an army, and provide and maintain a navy. Along with that, the presidential power to make treaties is dependent on the Senate’s
The secretary is involved in carrying out the President’s foreign policies through the Department of State. The Department of State goal is promoting American policies around the world. They have responsibilites such as: o Directs U.S. representatives to international conferences, organizations, and agencies o Responsible
Between 1918 and 1953 there was a major change regarding the foreign policy of the United States. At the end of the First World War, we practiced a foreign policy that was first established by George Washington in his Farewell Address back in 1796, which set a precedent of isolationism that was adopted until the beginning of World War II. Following Washington 's Neutrality Proclamation, the US did not engage in many global affairs such as the French Revolution and remained neutral through all foreign affairs. At the end of World War I, we continued to practice isolationism by not engaging in foreign affairs and limiting military spending believing that by pursuing this policy we could maintain peace and avoid war. Unfortunately, this
Domestic policy differs from foreign policy, which deals with a nation’s relationship with other nations, domestic policy tends to be more visible and often more controversial. The relationship between domestic and the other nations is also commonly linked by the influence of border security, improved infrastructure, surging economy, domestic culture, political, religion, social attitudes, and many other variables. American focus on national security strategies to protect the United States, promoting economic prosperity, creating peace through strength, and gaining American influences in the world. Our relationship with other nations can vary depending on each belief or values. A basic aspect in the relation between domestic and other nations is the importance of national identity and consistent needs to protect such values. Domestic and foreign policy can be distinguished as two separate concepts in international relations, because some nations do not have a similar set of objectives. Domestic sources play their role in the forms of compromises between social structure and elements of the government. The influence of the domestic policy forms the basis of foreign strategy. The relationship between domestic and other nations are separable in the sense that global politics play a major role in the modern global society and the conduct of states in
The budget for foreign policy functions is distributed among the institutions, this money is used to protect the U.S interest. This money only makes up 1 percent of the overall budget that the President submits to congress. This budget request includes funding for all federal executive departments and independent agencies that congress must approve in-order for the President to get things done. This will include funding for all U.S. international activities, like funding military assistance to allies and helping develop places that have weaker democracies. The U.S has key interest in developing other countries as we trade a lot of goods and services with other countries.
An official policy between states that is created by self-interest and are seen as an agreement between one or more states is called a foreign policy. It is conducted by writing a formal diplomatic note between the states, which are logged to become an official record of communication. However, many difficulties could arise when creating a foreign policy. For example, some of the challenges demonstrated in the International Relation Simulation that could be parallel to the real world situations, are factors such as conflicting interest that reflects on the states past and negotiations that are created between the states. These two factors can challenge how states preserve peace and trust between one another in creating a foreign policy.
Throughout the course of history, the United States has remained consistent with its national interest by taking many different actions in foreign policy. There have been both immediate and long term results of these actions. Foreign policy is the United States policy that defines how we deal with other countries economically and politically. It is made by congress, the president, and the people. Some of the motivations for United States foreign policy are national security, economics, and idealism. The United States entry into World War I in 1917 and the escalation of the Vietnam War in 1964 and the both had great impact on the United States.
During the1890s, the United States showed little interest in foreign affairs. The U.S. relied on previous foreign policies which resulted in inconsistent international trade in the years leading up to the twentieth century. However, following the rise of the industrial revolution in the United States American business began to recognize the vast potential of the international market place. The U.S. sought out to expand its territory globally to increase trade and protect its assets more effectively. The United States, at this point in the late 1890s, also began to listen to Alfred Thayer Mahan, an admiral and naval strategist. Mahan had previously called for a strengthening of the U.S. navy and an expansion of U.S. markets globally. Mahan also had great influence over his friend and current assistant secretary of the navy Teddy Roosevelt. In 1898 the U.S. was able to exploit a huge mistake made by the Spanish empire in Havana Harbor. The American ship U.S.S. Maine mysteriously exploded on February 15, 1898, killing 266 American sailors. The American public was outraged and they called for war to overthrow the “Spanish Murders” in Cuba. At this time, Spain was an imperial power with land possessions in the Caribbean as well as the pacific. They controlled Cuba and Puerto Rico in the Caribbean and the Philippines and Guam in the pacific. American politicians, including Secretary of State John Hay and President William McKinley, now began discussing the idea on going to war
Military action and presence helps but I believe there needs to be more of a plan with a end goal. This plan needs to include a timetable for action and specific plan. On the contrary, it is hard to have an official plan when different groups and issues are always arising. Military action helps for the U.S. to advance and prevent terrorist groups from taking over more areas and causing more turmoil. For example, after the events of 9/11 the U.S. government focused its foreign policy on global war on terrorism in which soldiers were deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq. Military action is what allowed us to expel Al-Qaeda terrorist from Afghanistan and liberate Iraq from Saddam Hussein’s doctoral government. These would have not been possible without military intervention.
As with all policy making, many people and organizations have a hand in setting United States foreign policy. The main goals of foreign policy is to use diplomacy — or talking, meeting, and creating agreements — to solve international issues. They try to keep problems from developing into conflicts that require military settlements.