The Ethical And Legal Dilemmas That Ms. Burrows

Authors Note: This paper is being submitted on the 18th of March 2013 for the winter semester of Medical Law and Ethics section 05.

The American Counseling Association and the American Mental Health Counselors Association Codes of Ethics both provide guidance and direction in making ethical decisions for their members (ACA, 2005) (AMHCA, 2010). Both the ACA and the AMHCA Codes of Ethics cover a wide range of moral and ethical situations that could present themselves to mental health professionals. Both of these codes of ethics have significant impacts on the counseling profession. The tools provided by these codes of ethics ensure that mental health professionals are able to conform to the regulations set forth. They address common concerns from varying points of view. Understanding these codes of ethics is essential to all mental

People from all walks of life face many ethical dilemmas. These dilemmas have consequences. Our worldview determines how we deal with these dilemmas, and guides us to the right decisions. In this essay, I will examine an ethical issues through my Christian worldview. I will also present other viewpoints, and compare them to mine.

* Justice - concerns the distribution of scarce health resources, and the decision of who gets what treatment (fairness and equality).

Through the ages, men have been able to find cures for catastrophic diseases through scientific research. Thanks to these advances, men have been able to prolong the life span of people, or provide better quality of life in cases in which a cure of various maladies has not been possible. To achieve such progresses, scientists have made use of prior knowledge, new theories, and technology obtaining numerous prodigious outcomes. Unfortunately, there have been many who have used questionable means for such ends. The German Max Clara is another case of a man with power and knowledge of science, who has misusing them. This paper aims to briefly identify principles and standards that would have been violated these days according to the existing APA Code of Ethics. Finally, ethical implications of making a moral judgment on past actions by researchers regarding human experimentation are discussed.

There are four principles of ethics: Respect for autonomy, Beneficence, Non maleficence and Justice. This four principles offers comprehensive thought of the ethical issues in clinical settings (Beauchamp and Childress 2001 cited in UK Clinical ethics Network 2011).

If psychologists learn of misuse or misrepresentation of their work, they take reasonable steps to correct or minimize the misuse or misrepresentation” in Carolyn’s case the psychologist continued on with the assessment without being aware of family background and allowing a mentally disabled woman to make her own decisions even if they did not benefit Carolyn’s medical or mental health. There was not even an attempt to contact the medical professional Carolyn may have seen from time to time. Apparently there was no written data within this psychologist reach

The ethical principles involved include: Autonomy, Finality, Justice, Non-maleficence, Utility, Tolerance and Rationality. These principles can be applied to the case as a whole or to specific events that unfolded. In respect to IIce, non-maleficence was violated when she was in the care of her parents. Her parents refused to seek medical attention when they found out she was premature, had respiratory difficulties, or did not respond well to the vegan

The EAI indicates that ethical guidelines have changed from individual character to organizational ethics (Ethics Awareness Inventory, 2011). The prime focus of this change are client-patient relationships in psychological counseling and clinical practice (Fisher, (2013). Psychological counseling and clinical practice are both constructed on ethical guidelines with the possibility for misuse of power and negligence to discretion (Fisher,

The main pathway for a counselor to help the client is by learning as much about them as they can. Through interviewing and sometimes evaluating say Remley & Herlihy (2015), the counselor decides if they have a diagnosis and together the client and the counselor match a treatment option or options with the client and their diagnoses and goals. In order for a client to use their health insurance, they must have a mental health diagnosis. However, the act of downcoding or upcoding is unethical as well as illegal.

The APA code of ethics general principles intent is to guide and inspire psychologist toward the highest ethical standards of the profession. The five basic principles are beneficence and nonmaleficence, fidelity and responsibility, integrity, justice, and respect for people’s rights and dignity.

Lying on the Couch by Irvin D. Yalom has been both entertaining and interesting from a counseling standpoint in that it provides a scandalous and as was in most of the cases, a look at what could go wrong if ethics in a clinical counseling setting go awry. Following the characters of Seymour Trotter, Earnest Lash, and Marshal Streider in working with their clients and with each other the ethical lessons to be learned become obviously apparent, if not emotionally painful. Although, numerous issues arise throughout the book, there were at least three that will be covered within the context of this writing. In consideration of each of these ethical breaches there will be dialog on the nature of the ethical issue or violation, where the ACA ethical code applies, ramifications of the ethical issue or violation on both parties, and application of Kitchener?s five primary ethical principles that were involved or violated. In addition, the justification offered by the characters in the book for their actions or considered actions, application to the situation in the setting of Clinical Mental Health counseling, and indication of personal response to the situation presented. Understanding that the use of these ethical principles and considerations as they apply in counseling are unequivocally valuable tools in helping a practitioner in working with clients to make comprehensive decisions that will not create conflict within their ethical parameters and are aligned with the laws

Ethical principals are the seed of which nursing flourishes from. Many ethical principals were involved and dishonored in this case such as, justice, autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, confidentiality and fidelity (Burkhardt et al., 2014). I believe justice was the main principal involved as the entire ethical predicament was revolved around unjust behavior and treatment of the residents. The residents were treated poorly and given unequal rights as a causation of their illnesses. Autonomy, an essential piece of human rights was also being violated in this ethical dilemma. The residents did not have any choice or independence in their care or how they were being treated. Beneficence and non-maleficence are significant dynamics of this ethical situation, as the health care providers needed to reflect on how they can have the maximum benefit while diminishing possible damage to the residents (Burkhardt et al., 2014). Our actions as nurses should always be beneficent and non maleficent, continuously being kind, compassionate and doing what is in their best interest as well a removing and preventing harm. Confidentiality is a key component of nursing and it was blatantly being violated as the health care

integrity principle by defrauding the insurance company. The bookkeeper was concerned about this shady technique. Further he asked the bookkeeper to just fudge the claims by asking for authorizations with certain language –to extend the client’s sessions as he had promised them. This was in violation of the principle of integrity which states we, as psychologists, are to “avoid unwise or unclear commitments”. This principle also includes criteria we must uphold of promoting “accuracy, honesty and truthfulness in the science, teaching and practice of psychology”. We are not to “steal, cheat or engage in fraud, misrepresentation of facts”, etc. (The Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, 2010).

The major principles of principalism include respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice (Lecture 3). Each notion has its advantage and good intentions. For me, these 4 principles, are indispensable, are required for a high ethical standard circumstance. As a health care provider, I would rank the non-maleficence as my priority; beneficence would me my second one; respect for autonomy would be the third one and justice would be last. “Non-maleficence is the notion of not knowingly causing harm to someone” (Lecture 3). As a nurse, one need to care and enhance one’s condition without harm. Beneficence is the principle of requiring doing good and refers to the obligation to act for the benefit of others (Lecture 3), which