The Ethical Ethics Of Life Without Zoos And Aquariums

1735 Words7 Pages
Think for an instance about life without zoos or aquariums. You might cheer because of the thought that the animals are free, you may feel upset because you will no longer see your favorite animal, or perhaps you could feel indifferent. Nonetheless, zoos and aquariums are a humane and essential resource to understanding our life, our species, and our world. Constructing zoos and aquariums are an ethical and beneficial practice because they are places that provide human contact with nature and animals without harming the animals’ habitats, they prohibit endangered animals from becoming extinct and conserve the animals’ population, and they improve the health of the animals. Zoos and aquariums are rational, noble, and benevolent in these manners…show more content…
“Ultimately, endangered species will only be saved by preserving their habitat and combating the reasons they are killed by people. Instead of patronizing zoos, it is better to support groups like the International Primate Protection League, the Born Free Foundation, Earth Island Institute, and other groups that work to preserve habitats.” (Source H) First of all, if an animal in a zoo is considered a dangerous threat to the locals, then the animal in question should be further examined, and, if dangerous enough, then yes, it should be eliminated. Secondly, a few accurate validations that prove that zoos and aquariums genuinely sustain the habitats of the animals. As written in “Polar Bears International and AZA Form Partnership to Inspire Action on Climate Change,” “PBI is providing funding, resources, educational programming and guest speakers, including the world’s leading polar bear scientists, to the zoos in order to create or enhance educational Arctic displays. AZA is committing to utilize these resources to grow stewardship in their communities and increase research which may assist in the conservation of polar bears in the wild.” (Source C) Zoos and aquariums do have a positive effect to them, not exhibited in PETA’s article; zoos and aquariums defend their animals’ habitats, if not increase the efforts to preserve them! Furthermore, some may see zoos and aquariums as a means of profiteering and entertainment. Illustrated in “Free the Killer Whale” by Jane Velez-Mitchell, she proclaims the following: “When it comes to animal exploitation--follow the money. Using animals for entertainment is big business, plain and simple. The killer whale Tilikum has helped SeaWorld sell millions of dollars worth of tickets.” (Source G) Her beliefs are that zoos and aquariums are an opportunity to take advantage of money by exploiting animals for

More about The Ethical Ethics Of Life Without Zoos And Aquariums

Open Document