The Ethical Principles Of The Eggshell Skull Theory

As a nurse it has happened to be an essential need to be conscious of the legal aspects associated with caring and serving people in the health industry today. Unfortunately, only fewer people want to get into the health care field fearing the legal aspects and the predictable law suits. The Tort Law is one of the legal aspects of the law that most nurses is more familiar with. This is the law that involved misconduct and negligence cases, which many nurses take the time to study in depth. This is one of the most universal and well-known laws, something that nurses and doctors must be familiar with, to maintain their care resourcefully.

The Tort of Negligence put the claimant in the position to prove that the defendant owed to them a duty of care, the defendant breached that duty and the claimant must have suffered damages as result of that breach (Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC562).

The tort of negligence was established with the leading case of Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) . Donoghue got sick from having a drink in a café after finding a snail in the bottle. Around this time, there was no route for litigation due to no contractual association. The only contractual commitment was with Donoghue’s friend who bought the drink and the café owner. Lord Atkin quoted the Bible’s principle of

A tort is wrongful interference against a person or property, other than breaches of contract, for which the courts can rectify through legal action. The reform effort is aimed at reducing the number of unnecessary lawsuits that burden the court system while still allowing injured parties compensation when they’ve been wronged. This latest effort at tort reform has given rise to the same spirited rhetoric that might be found in a courtroom.

this rule applies regardless of whether the defendant was aware of the condition such as in r v Hayward and also The thin skull rule also applies where the victim has refused medical treatment which would have saved them such as in r v Holland when

The distinctive body of law which is now referred to as tort arouse in the 1580’s with the first usage of the word ‘tort’ in a legal context. The general creation of ‘tort’ in a court of law was made to allow a party that has suffered harm due to the inactions or actions caused by an opposing party to impeach legal liability to the opposing party or to allow the accused party the right to defend their liability of such harms. The primary purpose of tort law Is to redress imbalances which has led to harm caused by another party this allows aggrieved parties to have the right and freedom to seek compensation for such damages as a court of law sees fit. Tort has a large distinction from other areas of law as crimes are punishable by the state, whereas as for a tort has specific consequences and allows the injured person or party the right to action. Tort’s largest outlying factor which differentiate from other areas of the law is the fact that for other areas of the law the case will classify the pursuant to their seriousness and in regards to tort this would not be the case due to the case will be decided in regards to a party’s legal liability and that the injured party receives right and just compensation for their losses.

In the article “Despite Counsel, Victim Is Hindered by tort laws.” The author Becca Aaronson, explains that sometimes tort laws may not feel fair. Connie Spears is just an ordinary woman who went to the Emergency because she felt some pain in her legs which she told the hospital she is known to have blood clots but, after being checked by the doctors they sent her home with a minor diagnoses. Just a short few days later she ended up in a different hospital with serious illness that caused her to loose both of her legs. She then filed a medical malpractice law suit but, she had to produce adequate expert reports within 120 days of filing their cases or she will be ordered to pay the defendants court fees. Connie Spears argues that

Tort reform has intense arguments to both sides and creates a myriad of concerns. On one side of the tort reform movement, defendants such as corporations and medical professionals want limits on the damages awarded to the plaintiff. The benefit of tort reform for defendant is the financial savings. However, a cap placed on medical malpractice cases and other cases that are of negligence would standardize the monetary compensation regardless of the damage. In my opinion, Medical malpractice tort reform is a gray area, for each breach of the standard of care involves a different story and person, therefore the damages vary and should be evaluated fairly. In this essay, both sides of the argument are discussed, with a focus on medical malpractice tort reform.

One approach to minimize large amounts of tort claims for medical malpractice is to put a cap on non-economical awards. Tort reform is the response; a tort is a civil lawsuit for damages over private wrongs other than breach of contract. According to Lau and Johnson (2014), a tort can be categorized into three categories: intentional tort, when tortfeasor acted with intent, negligence, if the tortfeasor did not act intentionally, but failed to act as a reasonable person, and lastly, strict liability, if the tortfeasor is engaged in certain activities, which caused injury or death due to it. The massive medical malpractice cases across the nation have made defending frivolous lawsuits is a national problem; ultimately, the general public

The moral philosophies each have their perspectives on moral act when it comes to others well- being. When an organization is operating in a safe and responsible manner, then there is nothing to fear. (HG.org., 2015). However, when negligence comes in play, then there is a red flag. Organizations should be operating at their highest potential and keeping their customer, clients, and patients in mind in order to continue without the fear of a lawsuit. The “frivolous actions,” are what some people express to those who are attempting to obtain any financial benefits from the negligence is sad. The tort reform is unfair to the people that are harmed and some of the injuries may be permanent and painful. Moreover, this violates the person’s constitutional rights and the tort law placing caps on the amount sets the boundaries to the ruling of the jury. An organization who makes the defective product or the physician who caused the pain, should be responsible for compensation for their wrongdoing or malpractice. With this, it could assist other organizations to practice the business without causing harm to their customers, clients, and

A tort actions is a form of civil law, which are intentional tort, torts of negligence, and strict liability torts, the vast majority of legal issues in the United State involve this, such as divorce, child custody, child support, domestic dispute, consumer problems, defamation, and injuries due to a person by another person. You can fine a civil lawsuit yourself or have an attorney do it for you, in this case you become the plaintiff and the other person will be the defendant. In most situations a civil lawsuit is filed for the purpose of

Information was given in relation to a case of a child named Alf suffering a seriousness illness as a result of negligent actions. The case has multiple possible defendants however not all would be found liable in court. It has been asked that advice be given in relation to this case on who the possible defendants are, who the plaintiff is, what torts have been committed and if there are any defences to the liable parties. Furthermore, limitation periods have also been requested.

Persistence is one of the great characteristics of a pitbull, and I guess owners take after their dogs,” says Annetta Cheek, the co-founder of the D.C.-based nonprofit Center for Plain Language. Cheek, an anthropologist by training who left academia in the early 1980s to work for the Federal Aviation Commission, is responsible for something few people realize exists: the 2010 Plain Writing Act. In fact, Cheek was among the first government employees to champion the use of clear, concise language. Once she retired in 2007 from the FAA and gained the freedom to lobby, she leveraged her hatred for gobbledygook to create an actual law. Take a look at recent information put out by many government agencies such as the Department of Veterans Affairs,

Torts of negligence are breaches of duty that results to injury to another person to whom the duty breached is owed. Like all other torts, the requirements for this are duty, breach of duty by the defendant, causation and injury(Stuhmcke and Corporation.E 2001). However, this form of tort differs from intentional tort as regards the manner the duty is breached. In torts of negligence, duties are breached by negligence and not by intent. Negligence is conduct that falls below the standard of care established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm(Stuhmcke and Corporation.E 2001). The standard measure of negligence is the universal reasonable person standard. The assumption in this case is that a reasonable

Presented are four separate cases that have been argued and settled in a court of law. Each of these cases represent a different kind of tort, a tort is a civil wrong or wrongful act, which can be either intentional or accidental, from which injury occurs to another (Hill & Hill n.d.). The torts are as listed, intentional, criminal, negligence, and liability as presented in the four researched cases.