The Ethics Of An Organization

This paper will discuss the reasons why CEOs are not being overpaid. It will apply the utilitarian ethical principle to many a few aspects to CEO compensation and whether or not it is justifiable for such pay. The paper will look at whether or not their performance is justifiable for the pay because they play such a big role in the livelihood of the company along with the principle agency theory and how it is being addressed for the benefit of the shareholders and others involved with the company, the supply and demand of the CEOs, and the paper will describe the comparison of other professions to help link the idea of CEOs being fairly compensated.

With these values in place makes sure that each person working within our organization models these characteristics. It helps establish priorities in daily work life and personal life and can help our organization grow. Effective organizations identify and develop a clear, concise and shared meaning of values/beliefs, priorities, and direction so that every employee understands and can

In Peter Eavis’ article “Executive Pay: The Invasion of Supersalaries” the conflict of CEOs and top executives outrageous pay grade is discussed. Even though the “compensation machine” of Corporate America is running smoothly, there are multiple negative and dark undertones. In fact, many people believe that these shocking salaries are the roots of inequality within America. Currently, some CEOs are being compensated millions and millions of dollars as their normal annual salary. Even though the current executive compensation system focuses on performance and can “theoretically constrain pay,” there is nothing stopping the companies from giving their CEOs more. According to the Equilar 100 C.E.O Pay Study, “the median compensation of a

At New Visions our mission and values statement, together with a general consensus within our agency on desirable and acceptable moral behavior, obligate our board, our staff, and our volunteers to observe the following code of ethics in the performance of our work (Manning, 2003).

While these citizen protests and legislative actions could be an overreaction to a few isolated cases of executive compensation excess, the data suggests otherwise. According to the AFL-CIO (2013), executive pay has increased dramatically over the past several decades compared to worker compensation. In 1982, the pay ratio between executives and workers was 42:1, but by 2012 it had increased to 354:1. This 8.4-fold differential in compensation suggests that the productivity of executives has also increased 8.4-fold relative to productivity of workers. If executive pay is positively correlated with a firm's bottom line, then higher pay should predict success. Unfortunately, researchers have found the opposite to be true.

Royalty House respects and fosters loving, family centered values. Royalty House believes that every individual deserves a chance at new beginnings and the opportunity to obtain the necessary tools to become self-reliant and self-sufficient in adulthood. The NASW Code of Ethics principal states: that social workers’ primary goal is to help people in need and to address social problems. Social workers elevate service to others above self-interest. Social workers draw on personal knowledge, values and skills to address social problems and help people in need. Social workers are encouraged to volunteer some portion of professional skills with no expectation of significant financial return (pro bono service), (Manning, 2003, p. 283).

Ethically, as supportive professional staff members in the long term care facilities it is important to do what is best for the residents within the organizations based on safety concerns and the policies of the organizations. “LLR.sc.gov (2016) reports the administrator, in all professional relationships, practices with compassion and respect for dignity of the individual, with primary commitment to the resident. The administrator practices administration in a manner consistent with the laws and standards of practice pertaining to nursing homes and community residential care facilities.” Most organizations are focused on working together to implement different strategies that would allow them the chance at improving quality issues or complaints

Excessive top executive pay is viewed by the public as a direct linkage to economic inequality or disparity. Many opinions state that over the top pay stemmed from compensation trends and indicates corporate Board of Directors as business people earning similar salaries as top executives. Pozen and Kothari (2017) reported “More than 95% of the time, shareholders overwhelmingly approve the pay recommendations.” (Decoding CEO pay, para 2). Excessive pay distorts the views of the public and injures the trust of American workers. According to Pozen and Kothari (2017), companies, legislation, compensation committees, and stakeholders need to clearly articulate the basis of their decisions for setting excessive compensation.

poorly designed. This rise in compensation more than doubled throughout the 90's providing the American people with greedy CEO's that just wanted more, no matter what the cost.

The practice over overpaying company CEOs in contrast to the general employee population is not considered a valid reward distribution system. As reported in the “The State of Working America”, the ratio between CEO salaries and average company wages was approximately 19.2 to 1 in 1965. In 2011, this ratio was nearly 220.2 to 1 (Mishel, Bivens, Gould, and Shierholz, 2012). Per Mishel, Bivens, Gould, and Shierholz (2012), this ratio has experienced a 177.15-point decrease from the year 2000, when the

Headlines have seized on dramatic accounts of outrageous amounts earned by executives (Kay). The CEO-to-worker compensation ratio was 20-to-1 in 1965 and 29.9-to-1 in 1978, grew to 122.6-to-1 in 1995, peaked at 383.4-to-1 in 2000, and was 295-to-1 in 2013, far higher than it was in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, or 1990s. Chipotle boss Steve Ells earns 28.9 million, 1,522 times the median salary of 19,000. CVS Health boss Larry Merlo’s 32.4 million pay is nearly 1,192 times than that of a median worker’s 27,139; many more CEOs are in this same case, where they are making a disturbing amount over their workers. This image of executives shows just how much they are paid, and when it is put beside their median workers, it becomes a problem. This tragedy can befall both shareholders and employees when CEOs line their own pockets at the organization's expense (Kay). On the bright side, Google’s CEO Larry Page, has only been paid a dollar a year along with Zuckerberg since both company went public. Larry Page got exactly 1 dollar in 2014; his median worker got 153,150 (Reuters), which is a common move for tech CEOs who have already made their money and or take home a hefty amount of stock. Another case would be CEO Dan Price and his decision to dramatically increase wages at his company Gravity Payments, making himself go from being a millionaire, to making a salary

Compensation in these organizations has many faces. Employee compensation may look quite a bit different that that of the executives, and certainly different from that of the stockholders/shareholders of the organization. The following is a proposal of how a compensation philosophy might look for a Fortune 500 Company:

There are few, if any other positions that put an employee in this situation. Important decisions are made by them everyday, many of which decide whether a company will prosper, or go under. Many of these men had to work their way to the top. They usually have extensive business backgrounds, and know their field well. There are very few people qualified, or knowledgeable enough to perform well in executive positions. That makes the ones that are, a hot commodity. Thus allowing them to demand the high pay that they earn.

Every organization has a set of ethical standards that they abide by. The organization ethical standards purposes: it build the organization confidence in the community , keep the employees uniformed in what the organization strive to have as organizational behaviors and help the employees have guidelines to make ethical decisions that protects the organization.

How do ethical values shape behavior in organizations? According to Saleem (2014), ethical values and behaviors of an organization are made up of organizations institutionalized philosophies along with the moral ideologies of its members. In addition, the codes of ethics help to enhance the moral reasoning of employees while shaping their behaviors towards morally questioning unethical situations. Organizational leaders are encouraged to build cultures of trust with leadership who establish concerning goals employees pursue y setting examples for others to follow (Crosbie, 2008). The leaders whom are able to build training and development throughout their organization helps design and build relationships characterized by collaborative behaviors those results in mutually beneficial outcomes (Crosbie, 2008).