The Ethics Of Animal Testing

The destructive use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also ineffective. Animal testing is a traditional approach to studying how human and animal bodies work. Many scientists who use animals debate that there is no other way to achieve their scientific purposes, and that any pain or distress caused to the animals is outweighed by the benefits of the research. However, is putting the lives of innocent, helpless animals worth it so that someone can enjoy a cosmetic product? On average over 115 million rabbits, dogs, cats, mice, and other animals are burned, poisoned and killed in painful experiments each year for the sake of cosmetics and toiletries. Many brands such as Dove, MAC, Maybelline, Veet, Michael Kors and plenty others

Many of the cosmetics that we use every day have also been tested on animals. The number of animals used for cosmetic testing has been greatly reduced as the potential hazards have been eliminated. Products such as sunscreens, anti-dandruff shampoos, fluoride toothpaste, and anti-acne creams could not have been proven safe without the use of animal testing since they contain ingredients that cause a chemical change in the body that could be harmful, even deadly. Without these safety tests, it would be impossible to ensure that these products are safe.

Animals lose their lives in a horrible way so that we can have useless things like makeup. A lot more brands use animals testing then society would think. By law before releasing a new medication it has to be tested many times on different animals first. One reason animal testing is horrible because it hurts them for not good reasons when there is more efficient ways to test products. (“Animal testing is a bad science”)

Every year, it is estimated that hundreds of millions of animals are used for experiments worldwide (Cohn). In those millions, an estimated 100,000 to 200,000 animals are used to test cosmetics alone (Humane). Scientists shouldn’t be allowed to test cosmetic products on animals because it is cruel and inhumane, there are other effective alternative methods, and it isn’t necessary.

Every year in the United States of America more than 100 million helpless animals will suffer and die from malicious chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics tests. Rabbits, Cats, birds, reptiles and amphibians are not covered by the minimal protections of the Animal Welfare Act, so they go unnoticed towards the millions of sufferers. Millions of rodents, birds, rabbits, primates, felines, canines, and other types of animals are locked inside barren cages in laboratories across the country. People have diverse opinions on animal testing and its morality. Morality refers to the standards of right and wrong shared in the society. We can define it as “human rights.” Ten moral traditions that all serious people accept are:

Cosmetic companies should not test on animals for their products, because its inhumane, wrong to do to living things, an they should not even have to do this to animals if their products are naturally and chemical-free. Around “100 million innocent animals are burned, crippled, and poisoned in U.S labs everyday,” for cosmetic companies (11 Facts). Animals should not be treated wrongly because they are innocent creatures that have no say or rights when it comes to testing. Consumers will start to leave and go away if they found out multiple types of animals were being tested on cruelly in labs. Companies should not even use chemicals in their products in the first place, if their products are good for our skin and us. Cosmetic companies should not test on animals for their products because animals should not be treated wrongly, consumers may start acting negatively towards companies, and chemicals are not even necessary in these products.

In addition the cosmetic products that we use, like the eye shadows and soaps, the sunscreen, if not correctly tested may cause danger to human life. Protecting human health is the main purpose of carrying out animal tests. The companies carry out these tests to establish the safety of the products beyond doubts. It is also the consumers who have been pressuring these cosmetic companies to offer safe and improved products.

First of all, animals are used by the cosmetic industry for safety reasons. Using animals to test the safety of a product is unnecessary because cosmetics can be animal cruelty free instead, the reason for choosing cruelty-free cosmetic is that throughout the world over hundreds and thousands of animals endure unnecessary suffering and due to the annual cosmetic testing they die, and according to the Humane Society International, testing on animals is still illegal in eighty percent of the world. Artificial tissue that is grown in a laboratory has proved to provide better results on how

Every Animal needs fair treatment.people cannot simply exploit animals rights the way they want. Hence, reform is needed to minimize the use of animals in research, particularly in cosmetic testing. It is important to realize that animal rights and welfare are a reasonable area of concern. Human must honor the sacrifices of the animal which serves for their wellbeing. And they must use animal as a last resort when all option runs out. Although animal testing for any use is still unjustified because they are still being killed and experimented

Animals are loving companions for adults and children, and should not be manipulated for testing purposes. Each and every living thing deserves a life without cruelty. Instead of using animals for cosmetic test subjects, scientists should find an alternative. Since animals are different than humans, they make poor and unreliable testing subjects. Therefore, animals should not be tested on for cosmetic companies.

Animal testing for cosmetic ingredients was introduced a few years ago due to the fact that women were wearing cosmetics, which included ingredients that were unsafe to human flesh and eyes,

Many people believe that animal testing for cosmetic products and substances should not be banned completely. The ECO Friendly Blog writes, “testing cosmetics on animals before introducing them to the public is needed for the process, or people would be exposed to products that are potentially harmful” (“Pros and Cons in Cosmetic Animal Testing” par. 4). This suggests that if you don’t test cosmetic products on animals it puts the lives of humans at risk every time the product or substance is being used. Without cosmetic animal testing, the products and substances could cause humans to experience severe health complications and or death. Nonhuman animals are used for cosmetic experimentation to ensure the safety of substances for the consumer

The need of animals for human experiments are no longer needed due to technological advances; tests such as in controlled microdosing, computerized drug trials, and vitro tests are scientifically proven to provide more accurate results than animal experimentation. There is an alternative to the entire animal-testing dilemma; some companies such as MAC and Revlon simply refuse to simply revolutionize the way their products are tested. There are other cosmetic empires such as Anastasia Beverly Hill and Too Faced that create the same products with the same great quality without testing their products on animals. Scientist have proven over and over again the different ways manufacturers can test their products without having to harm an animal; therefor the companies who still continue to test their products on animals are cheating themselves out of a better way of

Animal testing is widely used by many cosmetic companies to develop new makeups, hair products, and perfumes to ensure the safety of the product. More than 100,000 animals suffer and die in these experiments every year to create new cosmetics. Thus, it is ethical and morally unacceptable for scientists to use live animals in research of cosmetics because humans differ from animals, it is cruel and inhumane and also performs experiments that are unnecessary. Animals are like humans in certain ways. They feel fear, pain, and pleasure. Animal testing violates animal rights and should be put an end. “They violate the rights of an animal to be free from unnatural diseases, injuries or mental and behavior problem,” said John McArdle, director of

Using animals in research and to test the safety of products has been a topic of heated debate for decades. According to data collected by F. Barbara Orlans for her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, sixty percent of all animals used in testing are used in biomedical research and product-safety testing (62). People have different feelings for animals; many look upon animals as companions while others view animals as a means for advancing medical techniques or furthering experimental research. However individuals perceive animals, the fact remains that animals are being exploited by research facilities and cosmetics