The Ethics Of Justice

“The Verdict” is a movie that deals with medical and legal ethics. Frank Gavin is an alcoholic who hasn’t won any of his cases in the past three years. Mickey, his former partner, gives him a medical malpractice case that is sure to settle for a large amount of money. The case of Deborah Ann Kay, a mother who was given anesthetic when she had just eaten inhaled her vomit and is now in a coma. The Donaheys, her sister and brother in law are hoping for a good settlement and Frank assures them that they have a strong case. While the case is going on he meets Laura, a woman at a bar who he falls in love with. Frank goes to visit Deborah Ann Kay in the hospital and is affected by her condition. He meets with the defendants who run the

Human beings constantly ask questions regarding the nature of morality. In this process of prescriptive inquiry, they invoke specific ethical theories to explain the concept of right or wrong. The reason is that morality is concerned with the question of good or bad of an action. When determining the morality of actions, there are two principles of ethical philosophies that must be contrasted. These philosophies are teleological and deontological theories of ethics. While teleological ethics concentrates on the consequences of actions to achieve some sort of end, the deontological theories assert that morality is an obligation thus cannot be reduced due to the creation of desirable outcomes. Given these distinctively opposite traits of the two ethics, it is obvious that the methods of approaching moral theories are differs from each other. Kant and Aristotle developed theories that are contradicting to each other, however, both of them gives us a reason to ask questions and seek answers. This essay will be analyzing main ideas of two philosophers and comparing the theories introduced by them.

The relationship between justice and the good is and has been debated for thousands of years between many intelligent philosophers. Many theorists have attempted to to explain the exact characteristics and outline a moral distribution of possessions. From just after the First World War to present day, liberal perspectives emerged and flourished across a variety of ideological theories and continue to influence political thinking in regards to rights, equality and freedom. With this emergence came two very influential theorists in libertarian political philosophy, Robert Nozick and John Rawls, who take very different approaches to how justice relates to the good. Both Nozick and Rawls argue for liberty above equality, and that there is some

Issues involving questions of justice and fairness are usually divided into three categories, that of distributive justice, retributive justice and compensatory justice.

In this assignment which is based on a scenario, Kris who was arrested and found guilty for illegally buying a stolen merchandise and possession of a municipal amount of marijuana. Kris was given was given intensive supervised probation by the courts. Sergeant Orlando Boyce of the Deephall Correctional facility was detailed to monitored Kris probation.

Justice is defined in various ways. In the Merriam Webster online dictionary, the word justice is described as, “the process of using laws to fairly judge and punish criminals (“Justice”). Although this is only one definition, there are a variety of unlike definitions that include a person’s viewpoint. When envisioning the word justice, the word fairness comes to mind. My version of fair is when everyone has the same rights. One person cannot have more privileges than another person just because someone has more money, they are a different color of skin, or any other similar or unlike physical feature. One person should not have the right to do things that another person is not allowed to do. For instance, if employee one asks a certain amount

On the other hand, the principle of Justice specifically Distributive Justice is also applicable to this framework as it entails the assumed fairness of decision outcomes from a reliable

The justice system is the structure that promotes the rule of law. A court’s role is to interpret and apply the law that the legislature executes. Courts implement the law to distinct controversies presented before them. They resolve conflicts between companies, people and government entities, however, not all outcomes are just and fair. The message of the film InJustice is to show how the class action lawsuit was cautiously managed by a small group of lawyers who manipulated their clients, procedures, and the legal process to profit from Fortune 500 corporations. The film portrays the rise and fall of lawyers such as William Lerach, Richard Scruggs, and Melvyn Weiss.

In conclusion, utilitarianism proposes that an individual should at all times calculate the benefits that would come from his/her engaging in any action to ascertain the importance and benefits of the end result and therefore one should engage in that which leads to the achievement of maximum or the greatest pleasure and for the highest number of times. According to Bentham therefore, there are definite rules and codes that define an propose ways in which an individual must try to do in each and every action he engages in and every situation to ensure that such action benefits a maximum number of people. Bentham proposed the hedonic calculus that should be adopted and used by all people in the society before they are able to make a decision on the utility associated with every particular action.

Imagine that you live in a society where masked vigilante heroes with superhuman capabilities exist doing the right thing, taking all the responsibilities upon themselves and pursuing the rightful justice they believe to be correct regardless of what the authority and law dictates. It is just like watching or reading a popular superhero movie or a story where most of the time the ending always leaves you feeling happy. It shows how famous the superheroes are or how they always wanted to be out of the public eye. As Rosenstand (2013) explained in chapter four of her book, heroes tend to behave in a way it is described as selfish or self-interested as per the psychological egoism theory or they are just looking after themselves in an ethical

Pro makes three arguments, well really two arguments as to why he thinks we ought to prefer morality over justice.

Fairness Principle. It is based on the belief that stakeholders who have a vested interest in the firm should be treated fairly. There are four types of fairness: reciprocal fairness, distributive fairness, fair competition and procedural fairness. Reciprocal fairness addresses the issues of treating another party fairly and having the other party treat the firm fairly. Distributive fairness is based on the assumption that the allocation of finite resources within the firm will be distributed fairly based on maximizing the benefits of those allocations. Fair competition focuses on the fair treatment given by the firm as it interacts with its existing and potential competitors, Procedural fairness deals with ensuring that parties that interact with the firm are treated fairly from a due process perspective.

Procedural justice is the act involved in decision making. It incorporates the process of involving transparency and fairness in making decisions. The incorporation of justice in this process is equally essential it entails that all parties allowed to give their views before decision are made concerning a given matter. Some theories state that restorative and distributive justice might not be met but for as long as there is a fair and justice procedure, there is always the possibility of having outcomes that are equitable (Jason &Tyler, 2003).

Many people immigrate to the United States seeking new opportunities and a better lives as a citizen. Everyday citizens never think to question the validity of the pledge of allegiance, in particular the section that states "For liberty and justice for all". Does the United States government abide by this pledge and give every citizen, including the lawbreakers, justice? In my opinion, I do not believe that every citizen is given a fair trial under the current drug laws created by the government, which results in a higher rate of unreasonable prison sentencing.

Ethics is a topic that has been debated and discussed since the creation of humanity. This is mostly due to the fact that there are a myriad of different moral codes that people all around the world adhere to. Plato, an ancient Greek philosopher, wrote in his Republic how he defines justice and how it’s consequences drive people to be moral. The word justice in this instance is loosely translated and can also stand for righteousness in behavior (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). Plato also wrote about a Sophist named Thrasymachus who has his own opinion about justice and ethics that differs from Plato’s in many ways. Their debate and different views of justice shows why the human race should be moral because conforming to a moral code benefits society as a whole, and even if a person has a unique moral code, abiding by their ethics could still benefit them in the long run.