The Ethics Of Sexual Cheating

To be unethical is to be improper, going against what you think is right. Not everybody's ethics are the same but we all have that fixed idea to do the right thing. This is hard because in order to learn in life you need to make mistakes and to make mistakes can be unethical. All in all it is ok to be unethical but only in the rarest of circumstances.

This article explores the sexual health implications the sexual double standard can have on young black women in the U.S. The HIV rate for black women is between 4-20 times as high as the rate for other ethnic groups is a result of the sexual double standard due to men having concurrent sexual relationships because they feel powered to do so. This weakens women’s health because they become infected with these diseases which can lead to so many health issues. The sexual double standard expects women to have little sexual knowledge of themselves which limits their agency. It explains the intersectionality of black women and how the sexual double standard is traced back through history to slavery and racial inequality. In this sense, white women

Consent is uniquely argued position within philosophical analysis of moral and immoral behaviours, especially in regards to positions refuting consents ability to be sufficient enough to legitimize moral behaviour. We must remain critical in our analysis of consent, and ways that it may, or may not legitimize moral behaviours. At first glance, one might assume that; the consent of two people is enough to constitute moral behaviour. Upon further investigation, we become aware of another’s ability to consciously consent and engage in acts that will degrade and cause some form of harm to the other, usually for their own mental or physical pleasure, inducing the fact that

The ethical delimma of “Dual Relationships.” Dual relationship occurs when the professional such a case manager is in two different relationships with a client; one related to their career and the other is unrelated to the profession. The second relationship could consist of parties having in an intimate connection (boyfriend / girlfriend), relatives (father, mother, cousin, etc.), a second job co-workers, Sunday school teacher, child’s football coach, personal trainer, lawn’s man, etc. “Engaging in dual relationships is risky business for social workers” (Jeffrey N. Younggren, n.d.). They are at risk of violating work Code of Ethics, which later may lead into lawsuits or client’s mistrust of the professional worker.

Infidelity is another form of secrecy; it is “violation of a couple’s stated contract” (Webster Dictionary). It happens when an individual becomes connected with someone outside of the relationships, either in person or online. In the article The Secrets Couples keep, Marisa Cohen says, “In a perfect relationship, you wouldn’t keep anything from your sweetie?” (Cohen). Emotional affairs are appealing because it is easy to be close with someone who the individual doesn’t share any responsibility commitment with. It is possible to get good feelings when the person thinks they’re wonderful and doesn’t see their issues. Their relationship fails because one or both partners tries to have control. The love is torn and each person is left feeling

If the situation is analyzed with the classical utilitarian theory, the answer depends on the consequences, and the answer would vary based on the consequences. If Jim gets caught cheating, then cheating would be morally wrong; but if he did not get caught, it could be morally right. Utilitarianism dictates that the morality of a situation is determined by the consequences of actions, and what is “right” is whatever makes the highest number of people happy. It also requires fairness and impartiality. If Jim cheated on his paper and he got caught, that would harm more people than it would benefit. This would harm more people because his parents and his girlfriend

In Toni Morrison 's Sula, the society of Hannah and Sula is divided over each character 's sexual choices. Even though they both engage in the same activities, they are each judged for these actions differently. Society has no qualms with the sexual choices of Hannah. Her character sleeps with many men throughout the novel, and all the while, society never objects. This is because she was once married. After her husband died she longed for the touch and embrace of another man – a man who might fill the empty hole in her heart, a man who might cure this affliction. Sula, on the other hand, is despised for the choices she makes. According to society, Sula is using men solely for her own selfish pleasure. Unlike Hannah, society feels

In Haywood’s “Fantomina,” Haywood argues against libertine practices and attitudes, because of the abject effects libertinism has on women. Her portrayal of a supremely witty and manipulative protagonist, who is unable to overcome her biological limitations while still wishing to continue seducing her mark, exemplifies women’s inability to compete in a male–oriented philandering playing field. The ironic ease of sexual surrender from the different characters, the overtly carnal descriptions from the narrator, and the protagonist’s theatricality reflect Haywood’s open critique of libertinism’s adverse ramifications on the female psyche. She designs the increasing social statuses of

Act-centered sexual ethics is a very controversial topic in which all acts that defy the word of God are seen as unnatural or immoral. Humans are morally obliged to use their reasoning to determine what the laws are and then to act in conformity with them. Humans have the natural drive to eat, drink, sleep and procreate. These actions are in consensus with a natural law for species to live and procreate. Thus activities in conformity with such a law are morally seen as moral. With the church playing a big role in the relative morality of sexual ethics and the acts which are seen as dissolute the question of “why hasn’t the Church changed their views on non-procreated sex” comes about.

or the ancients, sex existed as a religion that became fueled by lust and occurring everywhere, and at anytime. Though Satan’s numerous advocates, the goddesses helped elevate destruction to damage God’s sacred sexual gift relentlessly. Ultimately, this sexual disgrace thrived nonstop; just as it flourishes today, existing just as much of a religion of lust, as in previous times.

Cheating has always been a deal breaker in relationships, but the reaction to cheating is given, as a recent study by the Chapman University states, by your sex. The researchers that conducted the study analyzed how men and women of diverse sexual orientations react to cheating. The results confirmed some stereotypes already rooted in our mentality, and demonstrated that there are major differences to how men and women react to different types of cheating.

This paper relies on secondary data on a past phenomenon. It combines data from journal and other internet sources to bring out aspects of unethical behavior by Adelphia's top executive. The analysis of data takes two ethical frameworks.

Of the three approaches to ethics that are mentioned above I think that the egoists support of cheating makes the best argument. Although, I personally do not believe in cheating I do think that egoist do justify the act of cheating. Egoists feel that we should put our selves before all others and that we should do what makes us happy. They feel that whatever

Is cheating ever justified? Some people tend to think that it is okay to cheat under any circumstance. If they are participating in sports, trying to pass a test, or in their personal relationships. One thing that people do not remember when in these situations is that the object they are seeking may not replace what they are loosing.

Many people tend to equate ethics with their feelings. But being ethical is clearly not a matter of followings one’s feelings. Ethics, however, cannot be confined to religion nor is it the same as religion. Being ethical is not the same as following the law. The law often incorporates ethical standards to which most citizens subscribe. But laws, like feelings, can deviate from what is ethical. Finally, being ethical is not the same as doing “whatever society accepts.” In any society, most people accept standards that are ethical. But standards of behaviour in society can deviate from what is ethical. An entire society can become ethically corrupt. Nazi Germany is good example of a morally corrupt society. What then, is