Surveillance On Consumers

Ever wonder why the windows of stores are captivating that give you that desire to purchase their item? According to Malcolm Gladwell’s “The Science of Shopping,” individual named Paco Underhill studies the behavior of millions of American shoppers by looking at statistics and recorded footages inside the stores. Consumer researcher Paco helps increase the income of the retailers by providing a false sense of public space inside a shopping area by tracing the behavior of shoppers through the lens.

Going to a shopping store is not the only place a consumer will be tracked and watched. Unfortunately, in the new era another level of eavesdropping has manifest through Smart television for American society. For instance Retail stores are spying on you in the stores and now have the capability to track your every move online. When you are at home you Smart television listens to your conversations and records what you watch. Consumer tracking may consist of video camera recording your license plate, bank information, credit score and eavesdropping through your television (Mosser, 2013).

With the seemingly exponential propagation of inexpensive digital communications technologies over recent years, the general public is becoming more aware of the issues surrounding information privacy and government surveillance in the digital age. Every Tom, Dick, and Harry with a smart-phone has to be wary of how they use their private information for fear of that information being collected and used in a way contrary to their wishes. "Leaky" smartphone apps that transmit private information across the internet can be unethically used by government agencies. The issue of privacy is a balancing act; the public usually wants increased privacy and the government usually wants increased access.

Thesis: Although some claim that retail anthropologists’ placement of surveillance cameras for consumers while shopping is manipulative, it is not in fact unethical because their actions are meant for the benefit of the consumers, the benefit of the producers, and most importantly, shoppers are aware of the surveillance cameras.

The topic of this paper is privacy. It will talk about the ethical and legal reasons for maintain privacy. The audience for this paper is high school level teachers in a school with one-to-one devices for every student.

We live in a society where we are watched constantly by social media, twitter, employers and even shopping surveillance cameras. Although each outlet has its different uses for watching, there are pros and cons. Social media may share life styles or events with users with just a touch of a button or click of a mouse. Twitter updates the user with instant news about certain individuals or celebrities and what is trending. An employer keeps a watchful eye on a new employee to make sure they are the right fit for the company or can also watch to make sure their assets are secure. Surveillance is mostly thought of as monitoring assets, but what about the true assets it monitors, the consumer at a store. Consumers are the bread and butter of the store, without the consumer there are no sales, and if no sales then there would be no store. I refute the claim that the retail anthropologists’ surveillance of consumers is manipulative or unethical. In fact, I think the surveillance of consumers can help both the retailer and the consumer. Surveillance can provide an overall good shopping experience for both consumer and retailer. The surveillance videos can show which products the consumer wants and buys, it can help the retailer place good products in good organizational areas, and provide not only the consumer, but the retailer with a good overall shopping experience.

Purpose: To inform the audience about electronic surveillance and the right to privacy Thesis: Electronic surveillance and the right to privacy is an increasingly controversial issue in modern American society. In this speech I will describe the technology, how employers and the government use the technology, and how the courts have interpreted the right to privacy. Organizational Pattern: Topical I. Introduction A. Attention Getter- 'I always feel like somebody's watching me' have you ever felt this way in the workplace or elsewhere?

Would you like to have someone snatch an item from your store?Tracking customers are becoming more and more popular for stores in the United States. Currently, retailers are using cameras and smartphones to learn about their customers’ shopping experience and tendencies. Critics may argue that spying on customers is creepy, but it prevents shoplifting and gets customers good deals and coupons.

With technology gaining the ability to intrude upon each individual’s privacy, people are only recently becoming aware of the ways in which this is achieved—while many are focused on, for example, the NSA tapping into his or her phone, the biggest invasion of privacy comes from a system which we often turn a blind eye to: consumerism. In the article “Economic Citizenship and the Rhetoric of Gourmet Coffee”, Mathieu uses Starbucks as an example to show how one company can appeal so strongly to costumers that the consumer turns a blind eye to the company’s ethics. However, in the article “The Science of Shopping”, Gladwell analyzes the methods in which retailers try to appeal to their customers to maximize their sales.

We live in a society where we are watched constantly by social media, twitter, employers and even shopping surveillance cameras. Although each outlet has its different uses for watching, there are pros and cons. Social media may share life styles or events with users with just a touch of a button or a click of a mouse. We use Twitter to monitor or see what updates there are regarding our friends, family, or celebrities, which is a form of surveillance of people’s lives. An employer keeps a watchful eye on a new employee to make sure they are the right fit for the company or can also watch to make sure their assets are secure. Surveillance is mostly thought of as monitoring assets, but what about the true assets it monitors, the consumer at a store. Consumers are the bread and butter of the store, without the consumer, there are no sales, and if no sales then there would be no store. I refute the claim that the retail anthropologists’ surveillance of consumers is manipulative or unethical. In fact, the surveillance of consumers can help both the retailer and the consumer by providing videos which show what products the consumer wants and buys, it can help the retailer place quality products in appropriate organizational areas, and provide not only the consumer, but the retailer with an overall superior shopping experience.

The thing that jumped out the most while reading the article was the invasion of privacy. However, the software installed on the cars to monitor their activity is similar to the software that is installed on company computers to monitor their activity as well. This is done as a means to safeguard the assets to ensure they are being used properly for business purposes. This software is used to improve efficiency of the use of the asset, and protect against risk of the item being used improperly or illegally. The monitoring software acts as an internal control for the equipment use.

Hi Danae, I think the examples you choose were very strong to support your argument that surveillance of consumers by retail anthropologists is not manipulative and unethical. However, I think you should add some details to these arguments, especially your first one. You should definitely mention how the surveillance of consumers allows retailers to improve constomer interaction, but as well as provide a real life example with statistics from another source in addition to the video. I think that your thesis is very strong in explaining the overall points you are trying to make. I can clearly see the points you are trying to make, you argue that surveillance of consumers helps retailers how to increase customer interaction, satisfaction, and

For my research paper I chose one of my favorite companies, which is Victoria’s Secret. They are a profit organization and the company sells lingerie, womenswear and beauty products. Victoria’s Secret has been in business since June 12, 1977 in Ohio who was founded by Roy Raymond and Gaye Raymond. Victoria’s Secret was originally supposed to be for men shopping for lingerie for their wives or girlfriends without being judged. Then throughout the years it was changed to just a lingerie store for women.

First of all, it is important to know the definition of privacy, it is the right to control who knows what about you, and under what conditions. The right to share different things with the people that you want and the right to know that your personal email, medical records and bank details are safe and secure. Privacy is essential to human dignity and autonomy in all societies. If someone has committed a physical intrusion, or, in discussing the principal question, has published embarrassing or inaccurate personal material or photographs of the individual taken without consent, he is invading their right of privacy, which is in the article eight of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The purpose of this paper was to observe the consumers of a retail store of my choice; I chose to observe Victoria’s Secret and Targets consumers, because I myself am consumers of those stores quite often, then to analyze the behavior of the consumers of Victoria’s Secret and Target. Victoria’s Secret and Target consumers differ because of the difference in type of retail they offer and sell. Victoria’s Secret consumers know what they are going to be shopping for women and certain needs or wants they are looking to satisfy. Target consumers shop for any age and any gender,