The Ethics Of The United States Army Essay

Ethics Theory for the Military Professional by Chaplin (COL) Samuel D. Maloney illustrates the complex ethical decision making process. Army Leaders are responsible for professionally, and ethically develop subordinates. Developing unethical subordinates in a zero defect Army is a leadership challenge. Goal-Oriented Aspirations, Rule-Oriented Obligations, and Situation-Oriented Decisions provide leaders an understanding of the ethical decision making process. The first step to Professionally developing subordinates is identifying, and providing input on all subordinate goals. Leaders are obligated to enforce rules and regulations. Understanding subordinate character provides leaders with the information to evaluate a soldier’s integrity. However,

In the United States Army we are taught to live by the Seven Army Values. They are broken down to us in the acronym ‘LDRSHIP’ which is short for Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless Service, Honor, Integrity and Personal Courage. We are all taught these 7 Army values repeatedly from day one in the United States Army. First we memorize these values. Then we are trained to live by them. All of these 7 values coincide with each other, and play an important roll in our Army lives. These 7 Army Values also play well into life outside the Army in our personal life. People sometimes do not realize the importance these values have on the way we are viewed by the people who look up to the men and woman who are privileged enough to represent the

The US Army values soldiers that are accountable for their actions. Being accountable means being dependable; arriving to work and appointments on time, meeting deadlines, being in the right place at the right time and doing the right thing at the right time. Morning formation is the most imprtant formation of the day. It is made to get accountability of everyone and to put out any information that needs to be addressed. Without having accountability there is no way of knowing where soldiers are or whats going on. Not only does accountability matter in formation, but it is also imperative to have accountability if all of your weapons and sensitive items.

Being a professional soldier goes a long way. It means a person take pride in everything they do throughout life. It takes a lot of energy and time to earn this title so upholding its standard is a must. A soldier abides by all his and her codes and creeds. Also, the soldier must follow the army set values. There are seven values and all have a significant importance to our nation; loyalty, duty, respect, selfless-service, honor, integrity, and personal courage. These seven values are all a soldier needs to be professional in the army. Following each of them and executing them will build your character and define you as a soldier and a person.

Being late does not make one important. Tardiness is a very unattractive quality when it comes to most aspects of one’s life: family functions, meetings, interviews, and especially a job. While a family may forgive tardiness, a job will not. Being late once or twice in one’s life is unavoidable. Being consistently tardy makes one unreliable and shows a lack of respect for other people’s time and obligations. Being late tells others that one person can be waited on, while everyone else can’t. People do not like when their feelings were not taken into consideration, when they took the time to consider others.

What is accountability? The Army definition is: The obligation imposed by law or lawful order or regulation on an officer or other person for keeping accurate record of property, documents, or funds. The person having this obligation may or may not have actual possession of the property, documents, or funds. Accountability is concerned primarily with records, while responsibility is concerned primarily with custody, care, and safekeeping. However, the way I see accountability is the responsibility of keeping track of the equipment or personnel assigned to you. Accountability is a big thing in the military because it ties in with responsibility and duty. That obviously makes it an important topic, no matter your rank. No

Accountability (noun) Being responsible or liable for someone or something at the state of event and or situation.

As far as the grading of the APFT goes, although FM 21-20 specifies the correct way to do a push-up or sit-up, the actual scoring for these events are wildly inconsistent from grader to grader. Sometimes these inconsistencies hurt a Soldiers score, but often these inconsistencies give an unfair advantage to a Soldier over his or her peers. The inconsistencies in grading the APFT and measuring a Soldier’s body fat are magnified by those leaders who don’t even bother and just “pencil whip” the results of both.

A soldier of the United States Army has many values that are set forth in the “Soldier’s Creed.” The Soldier’s Creed states:

the actions of the corrupt officers were wrong and unethical. They weighed the positive results

Ethical Issue Facing the Army The purpose of this paper is to briefly identify an ethical issue currently faced within the Army. Furthermore, this paper will delve into the root causes of the believed issue and discuss its impact on the force. In order to do so, the ethical issue will be addressed using the ethical lenses of rules, values, and outcomes resulting in a recommend solution.

What is accountability and the definition: (DOD) The obligation imposed by law or lawful order or regulation on an officer or other person for keeping accurate record of property, documents, or funds. The person having this obligation may or may not have actual possession of the property, documents, or funds. Accountability is concerned primarily with records, while responsibility is concerned primarily with custody, care, and safekeeping.

This paper is being conducted on the ethical dilemma that occurred during the movie Saving private Ryan. A mother unknowingly has lost three sons to battles across Europe in a single day. The Chief of Staff of the US Army has made the decision that the last remaining son must be pulled from the battlefield at once as he is the last surviving male in his family. There are many ethical dilemmas throughout the entirety of the movie, but there was one that stuck out to me the most. As the movie is steadily going alone I constantly asked myself what was the purpose of the movie and why were the Soldiers there. In return I kept coming up with the same conclusion that a group of guys are basically out risking there lives for ONE person. At any point throughout the mission these guys could have just given up and turned around because who can one justify why other men should risk their lives to save just one other person. These other men had mothers as well, and many of them could have been the last son in the family also. How could the military expect a small team of eight to go across the battlefield with the hopes of finding a single person in which at that time no one knew where he

The fear of repercussions of disobeying military orders should not be an allowable excuse for not whistle-blowing. From the utilitarian perspective actions are right insofar as they promote happiness and wrong as they bring the reverse of happiness: pain (Mill, 1910.) The repercussions of disobeying orders would be wrong because it would bring produce the reverse of happiness via pain and privation of pleasure. However, one also assess the situation from the view of Kant that maxims should only be acted on when they can become a universal law (Kant, 1898.) Should everyone not act for of disobeying orders, we can presume that other heinous crimes would go unreported. Returning to Mill we can see how this situation would lead to more pain and privation of pleasure for all of humanity as opposed to a single officer. Therefore, both the utilitarian and deontological perspectives prevent the fear of repercussions from being an allowable excuse for not whistle-blowing.

The Army has a saying, “nothing happens until something moves”. A major part of what the Army does today is Supply administration. The Army figures how to secure items through produces, suppliers, stockpiling, inventories, and dissemination. At the point when in fight, if there are no supplies for the troops, the troops won 't have the capacity to suport the battle. The long time past days of utilizing steeds and trucks to move to supplies are away for created countries, for example, the U.S.