The Eu Referendum

The media coverage in the United Kingdom especially in the present climate can be described as anti migrant and asylum seekers. There is a suggested sense of being under siege with threats of invasion of being overwhelmed via Calais. With Headlines such as ` Migrants 'threaten EU standards' ` (BBC News, 2015), and reports from the government does little to show a different image as the recent comment from `British Prime Minister David Cameron has defended his policy of restricting immigration, arguing that illegal migrants are trying to "break into" the country`. Regardless of the fact that there are little other means in which they can gain asylum but to enter illegally. In considering this I am not suggesting that one should have no systems in place to control and monitor immigration but feel that this negativity does not address that people have the right to claim asylum nor does it show positive images or outcomes of those that have made lives

Shawn Pogatchnik shows how important the fact that so many migrants are trying to flee to Germany and other EU countries by using statistics. Pogatchnik states that the EU countries “...has seen more than 332,000 migrants enter so far this year.” He also says that Germany “...is expecting to take in 800,000 migrants in this year.” When people read the article, they realize that what is going on must be bad enough for hundreds of thousands of people to want to flee their own country to enter another European country.

In the final draft I will expand on each of the issues, by looking into more specific examples of both what different European countries are doing policy wise, as well as what the sentiment is among the refugees in the different areas of Europe. To fully be able to understand the conditions the refugees are facing I will be using other scholars ethnography work; One of those works being Katerina Rozakou’s piece regarding the management of refugees in Greece. As a result of that knowledge I will be able to come to an accurate conclusion as to what course of action should be taken in Europe as a whole, to deal with this ongoing

In the attempts to “manage the immigrant crisis” several strategic mistakes have been made, which have shaken the functioning of migration policy in the European community. Particular controversy was stirred up by a plan for the relocation of 120,000 refugees suggested in September 2015. Some months later (April/May 2016), the European Commission came up with the idea of fines for those countries which would not receive the relocated refugees. The fine for one unaccepted foreigner was supposed to be €250,000. The attempt to impose a quota of immigrants on member countries together with high fines contributed to further divisions inside the EU.

Throughout history, there has been a constant cycle of colonization by large and powerful governments and the ensuing struggle for independence. From the early empires of the Greeks and Roman colonizing the Mediterranean region during the classical period, to the colonization of the Americas, Africa and Asia by England, France, Spain and Portugal, to the Soviet Union, colonization has been a theme throughout history. In some cases, those being colonized have benefitted from the protection and resources of their powerful colonizer but in many cases it has led to suffering and despair. As John Locke once said, “Revolt is the right of the people.” Revolt can come in many forms and for Scotland, attempted revolt has come in the

Nicole Gelinas voices her opinion on how Europe should focus their immigration policies towards those who are in war zones and not those who leave on their own accord. I disagree. This policy should be focused on those who are making this dangerous trek and risking their lives to do so. Many of these people aren’t near a war zone but still face the same dangers as if they were. These refugees make this dangerous trek either by choice or force. Forced refugees leave because of the harsh laws, like Sharia, in their home countries that bind them to strict codes that are cruel.

Thousands and thousands of migrants have begun to flood into the European countries. With immigration numbers higher than ever, these countries have begun to search for solutions. Some countries have considered closing their borders , many are beginning to show violence to keep people out. As always, there is a much better solution other than using violence. The Europe Migration Policy needs to be adjusted to current needs and these countries need to work together to create better opportunities for the immigrants and refugees seeking safety.

What is the Referendum Process? I define it as the only way the written words of the constitution can be changed. We have this process implies so that parliament doesnt have too much power over the most important piece of Australian legislation. And so that the people can indirectly have a say in how the Constitution is worded. Constitution proposals only come up every so often. But, when they do it goes a little like this. The first thing you do is propose the bill you outline your ID and you have a drop person run up the bill. Than your proposal goes through the same legislative process as any other bill. The bill must be approved by both houses of Parliament. Alternatively if one house refuses to pass the bill the other house can pass

Accepting refugees in Europe has become a highly controversial problem in the past few months. Without a doubt, a large number of lives could be saved due to this ethical action; however, there has been a significant rise in protesting refugees. We should consider carefully the advantages and disadvantages of such a substantial

Scotland wants its independence, and there are those who are for it, as well as those against it. Those for independence want to be independent for reasons including that they are against nuclear weaponry, they want oil money to be put to good use, and they would rather make their own decisions. Those against independence argue that if Scotland were independent, jobs would be lost, the BBC would be broken up, and UK funding benefits Scotland.

The migration crisis has reached a level where Europe must take a stand and must present a viable plan, expressing the future goals the European government believes will help solves this crisis. The International Organization for Migration said, between January and November 2015 more than 750,000 migrants are predicted to arrive in Europe from across the Mediterranean. As a union, Europe is showing the world that they are not a cohesive organization prepared to face the future with respects to the mass migration. The policy concerning migration at the European Union level states that each nation has the right to their own migration policies, while adhering to the European migration institutions, which are not fully established. So far, many of the migrants coming to Europe are settling in Italy and Greece; many hope to be able to reach Germany as their final destination.

The very notion of a nation state, imagines for many people, feelings of warmth and protection, a home, groups of people all tied through social, ethnic, economic, and historical bonds. To protect these associations, borders in combination with judicial powers give the nation-state authority to decide who can enter the country. This essay looks closely at the connections between a nation states immigration and border procedures and whether these policies are just and fair, or they in fact, incompatible with the concepts of equality, rights, and justice. Looking specifically at the policies and border controls of those countries now known as the EU and the UK. Whilst also evaluating the experiences of the various categories of migrant, for instance,

Referendums are legal mechanisms for voters to repeal or accept a law passed by the state legislature. We live in America which is a Democracy. We should have a legislative referendum process used on the national level of government. If I have the right to vote for who I want as president, I should have the right to view and have a say on the laws they are establishing as well. Of course, regardless of what we do in the government a group of people will always be unhappy—that’s just a fact. But there is far too many issues that are up for discussion for the government alone to have all the answers for. Therefore, I think that if a law is passed through the three branches of government, then we the people should have a vote too. If we the people

Every year, thousands of Sub Saharan Africans trek through the dangerous journey north to attempt to get into Europe. These people emigrate from some of the poorest nations in the entire world seeking a longer, higher quality life. These migrants are escaping a life expectancy of only 47 years and a population growth almost four times that of Europe and HIV rates almost nineteen times that of Europe. They seek a better life not only them, but their families as well, looking for higher education rates like Europe 's 99% versus their 66% education rate. Overall the living conditions of sub-saharan africa are extremely poor along with a GDP almost six and a half times lower than Europe’s. These migrants pay what they have saved for years just to buy their way to Europe, costs ranging from approximately one to three thousand Euros. All these problems are the origins of sub-saharan migration to europe, where thousands are losing their lives every year, but what should Europe do about it? Although there are EU policies to help migrants who get into EU soil, these policies are only of good use when they are used correctly by uncorrupted systems. This makes it hard for migrants to try to get residence in the EU, on top of the fact that these policies do not apply to the bordering nations. These problems along with discrimination and the fact that the journey to get there in the first place is extremely dangerous, all of these problems should be addressed by the EU and

The Schengen Area is comprised of 26 countries that have agreed to allow free movement of their citizens within this area as a single country. Schengen agreement was signed and implemented in alignment with the scenario of the unification of Europe as a single sovereign federation of states, similar to the United States of America . The idea was if the EU becomes a country with a common currency and open borders between the countries, this continent could re-gain its position in the modern world as a giant economic power by implementing a bigger trade, better communication, more science research, and so on. While some industrialized countries like Germany and France were hoping for cheap workforce through the Schengen agreement, pros and cons of immigrants and cheap workforce and their effects on their native citizens’ life were always in debate of European radical right-parties and the main obstacle in approaching this agreement. It is obvious that the writer is trying to create a worrisome issue looming over the Schengen countries by connecting the recent Paris attacks to the Schengen zone and suggesting the suspending of open borders within the countries in this area. While it is not clear either the Schengen agreement or the refugees or both issues are being targeted in author’s article, this paper explains the irrelevancy and nonsensically of this connection and suggests to view and solve these issues in a different way.