The European Model Worth Emulating The United States?

Government officials may want to regulate the internet but no matter how hard they try it will be nearly impossible to complete because of how rapid the internet it growing. So many different sites are created everyday there is no way of keeping up with how many there are or how big the internet actually is. Not only is the internet an ever changing

In this paper, I will be arguing against the text by Lawrence Lessig by providing evidence and reasoning that proves that complete internet regulation would never be implemented on a global scale due to the privacy concerns that the United States would face while minimal internet regulation, like what Lessig suggests, would be unable to coexist with countries like China and Saudi Arabia who morally conflict with a global majority. Internet regulation will never be consistent in a global scheme and would require constant revision which makes it not provide enough utility to be considered when judging from Utilitarianism.

Government should regulate computer and technology to some extent like preventing illegal access to computer technology, information, and its application without paying. However, government should prevent someone from entering into somebody personal privacy in online. Also, there should be a law to prevent children to access certain sites because if they are not mature the children can be influenced in a wrong way. The governments need to stop people from using illegal download because when illegal download occur the company of the product lose their money and that hurts a business. Intellectual property needs to be protected because anybody can gain benefit from the hard work someone else, so that would be wrong not to protect intellectual property.

A website places a cookie on your computer to remember certain data so it may run smoother when you return to the site, some government’s collect data to collect data for national security, Google can also collect data to send to marketing companies.

Cookies are used to collect the information about your visit to the website. This information can be used in many ways for the multiple devices to monitor and maintain the information about the visitors to our website. Some visitors may set the browser not to accept the cookies or notify when you receive the cookies for deciding whether to accept the cookies. If you do not accept the cookies then you will not experience any visit orelse you have to subscribe the service offerings on this website. These cookies play an important role for providing the good customer experience.

is duty bound to follow regulations and laws to ensure the safety of consumers by

In Jim Harper’s essay “Web Users Get as Much as They Give” (546), he states that “Most web sites track users, particularly through the use of cookies, little text files placed on Web surfers’ computers. Sites use cookies to customize a visitor’s experience.” This does make it hard to have privacy, but what Harper may not have considered is the good things about the cookies being stored. If someone were looking something up and they press the “stay logged in” button, they could close their browser and start back up where they left off, by staying logged in. This helps people who have a bad memory, or who browse the web frequently without remembering all the sites they

Marketers don't fear that the government will ban or restrict cookies someday. After heavy lobbying they managed to secure an amendment to the Securely Protect Yourself Against Cyber Trespass Act that would exempt cookies from any spyware legislation that passes in the House (Peneberg, 2005).

Brookman’s article ranges from how efforts to improve privacy laws have been futile and how privacy protections have actually diminished. Throughout the article, Brookman concludes that although the motions for privacy are far from actualization, the issue of privacy is slowly evolving and becoming more recognized. Brookman provides a solution for those concerned with protecting their privacy, but the main goal seems to be suggesting the reader to observe the real situation regarding privacy laws and protections and taking actions to protect their own privacy. This text is essential because of its truthful view and its suggestive manner. Parts of this article can easily be used in discussions regarding the privacy and protections. Several subsections of the articles address the dwindling control of consumers and their privacy and would serve to provide arguments for and against consumer

Regulation is the EU’s core responsibility in the Internal Market. To make the Internal Market function properly, both EU regulation and changes in national regulation have to be enforced. It is in the EU

The government has been monitoring and regulating an every day’s persons website history and what we buy and look at on the Internet. With the Internet growing rapidly and the amount of users on the Internet increasing, the easier it is for the government to find out peoples’ interests. Many people argue whether or not we should have vigorous rules and regulations when it comes to the Internet. One of the main concerns people have when it comes to their Internet is their privacy. There are many people who want to do harm using the tools that the Internet provides us with. The Internet should be regulated but not as harsh as some

Regulations are rules imposed by governments on companies, and individuals to ensures that society is protected. These safeguards can include protections for better and cheaper services and goods, as well as the protection of firms from “unfair” (and fair) competition, cleaner water and air, and safer workplaces and products (Litan, 2016, para. 2). In today’s information-driven business world, it is important that regulation exist to protect consumers and companies from online scams and warranting the privacy of personal information. According to Johnson (2011), e-commerce regulation deals broadly with

Regulation of the Internet is a volatile topic. One reason comes from the very nature of the Internet.  While not entirely different from

The concern about privacy on the Internet is increasingly becoming an issue of international dispute. ?Citizens are becoming concerned that the most intimate details of their daily lives are being monitored, searched and recorded.? (www.britannica.com) 81% of Net users are concerned about threats to their privacy while online. The greatest threat to privacy comes from the construction of e-commerce alone, and not from state agents. E-commerce is structured on the copy and trade of intimate personal information and therefore, a threat to privacy on the Internet.

However, this rule is subject to a number of exceptions. Notably, the rule does not apply to some consumer contracts. These consumer contracts will be governed by the rules contained in ‘Brussels Regulation’ and ‘Rome Convention’ which are beyond the scope of this article.