The Euthanasia Debate Essay

One of the Ten Commandments put forward by God to Moses at the top of Mount Sinai. The killing of another human being is morally wrong and unacceptable. No one has the right to take away another persons life, whether it be through hatred and disgust, or compassion and love. Murder is murder. So why should those select few who work in the clinics of Switzerland, whose occupation is to assist in a person’s suicide, become immune from this law against murder. It is them who provide the patient with, and administer, the method of how they are going to die. To me, that sounds like murder.

When someone is inevitably dying and in inexplicable pain is it really a crime to grant their wishes and end their suffering? As of right now euthanasia is illegal in many countries and is a very controversial topic. Is it compassion for the patient helping them in ending their life or murder? The doctor is not giving death as an option, it is the patients choice and even where it is legal there are many rules. Euthanasia should not be considered a crime because the patient is not being murdered; they are having their suffering end in a painless, humane way out of compassion for the patient and their family.

We believe all people should have the freedom to make choices in their life, however the question posed today is whether we have the freedom to choose our death. Some say absolutely. We should have the freedom to decide how we spend our last days. If they’re filled with pain, debilitation, and cause hardship on our loved ones, we should have the right to opt out. Others take the position that we didn’t choose our birth therefore our death isn’t ours to choose either. This has caused considerable debate as moral, ethical and legal ramifications come into the mix. This in turn has led to defining the process under two different terms for legal purposes. They are euthanasia and physician assisted suicide. Internationally, assisted suicide is when a doctor prescribes a drug that ends life, but the patient is responsible for taking them. Euthanasia is defined by the doctor giving the dose to the patient himself. Today, four countries have laws that allow euthanasia. These would be Albania, Belgium, The Netherlands and Luxembourg. (1) A select few have laws for physician assisted suicide. There are many countries that have no laws against suicide, or turn a blind eye. (2) The United States has recently added a 5th state to offer “Death with Dignity,” (3) however, this too is a division of categories. The name was created to form a separation between suicide and choosing death in the event of a terminal diagnosis.

In the Oxford English Dictionary, “euthanasia” is defined as “the means of bringing a gentle and easy death” (“euthanasia” def. 2). Today, euthanasia is a method used in the medical field to put an end to a patient’s agony by taking their life for them, making it a very controversial topic. Many people argue that it is morally wrong to take a human life, and others may argue that it is even more wrong to make someone suffer more than they need to. I will argue that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is in fact morally permissible.

This systematic analysis of the professional literature will explore the ethical dilemmas that Canadian medical professionals face while considering euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide, the latter of which was made legal in Canada on June 17, 2016 (Chochinov and Frazee, 2016). This paper will discusses the conflicts that healthcare professionals are faced with when looking at the quality of life for the terminally ill or comatose patients and these patients’ desires to end their pain and suffering with physician-assisted suicide (PAS). With the legalization of PAS, just this year in Canada, there is a need to evaluate how healthcare professionals who have dealt with such decisions have fared and how the terminally ill patients have proceeded.

There is a societal problem or issues that is up for debate in the United States. This issue questions whether or not the U.S should adapt the Euthanasia Policy. This policy paper aims to provide a critical analysis into the life ending decisions of a patient using Euthanasia. Merriam Webster Dictionary defined Euthanasia as the act or practice of killing someone who is very sick or injured in order to prevent any more suffering. There are various types of arrangements for Euthanasia that could be taken for end of life treatment. Physician Assisted Suicide is a process in which a patient is prescribed a life ending dose of medication and consume the medication to end their life. Voluntary euthanasia is a practice in which the patient

Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide,has continued to be an ongoing debate within today’s news. Euthanasia is known as the killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. Some interpret euthanasia as the practice of ending a life in a painless manner. Many disagree with this interpretation, because it needs to include a reference to intractable suffering.

Euthanasia is a concept that has been around for a very long time. It has been practiced since ancient Greece. We all have different opinions towards it; some of us might be for it and others against it. In most parts of the world Euthanasia is illegal. Many countries have denied the right to euthanasia, but is that fair and ethical? It is the painless killing of a patient’s agony from an incurable and painful disease. Euthanasia should be legal. Someone who is sick and under unbearable pain should have the right to end their suffering.

Across the world, especially in the United States, there has been an increase in debates related to the topic of assisted suicide, also known as euthanasia. Many people, specifically in America, consider euthanasia as murder and against their ideals. In contrast, many specialists and other countries, as in Netherlands, believe that the idea of assisted suicide is a gesture of mercy towards terminally ill patients.

Euthanasia is defined as “the act of killing someone painlessly, especially to relieve suffering from an incurable illness.” Euthanasia, or more commonly known by medical professions as physician assisted death, is something a lot of people associate with quitting. Properly defined by Webster dictionary, quitting is a “[release] from obligation, change, or penalty.” Physician assisted death is considered death and not suicide due to the fact that a physician is administering the medication instead of a patient doing the act themselves. Some people argue that legalized euthanasia is murder, but it is a well known fact that euthanasia ends a patient 's agonizing pain, and puts less stress on their families when it comes to health care payments.

There are many aspects to look at the performance of Euthanasia. Various scientists, doctors, and physicians view euthanasia as a privilege or even a favor given to an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, such as cancer. Euthanasia is also the fancy word for the term "mercy killing." This assistance ends life for humans and animals alike, in a painless or the least elaborate way. Euthanasia does not refer to the method of "letting die", "allowing to die", or to remove all forms of nutrition and hydration from the victim. On the other hand, euthanasia is subdivided into many subdivisions, in which euthanasia acts as the responsibility to assist a "desired death."

end one's life in the case of excessive suffering? Euthanasia has become one of the

Some would argue that euthansia is inhumane and a wrongful act. Euthansia is a way of painlessly killing someone, especially one who is suffering. When a beloved pet is suffering, that pet is euthanized to cause it no more pain. When a human being is suffering, they are forced to hang on, even if they don't want to, until they pass on thier own. In the United States, every citizen has a right to have a living will, which is a document written by someone still legally capable requesting that he should be allowed to die if subsequently severely disabled or suffering

Euthanasia--what does this word mean? It comes from the Greek words "eu" and "thantos" which translate to "good death" ("Euthanasia World Directory," www.efn.org/~ergo/). Though this is the very literal meaning, it has become a more complex concept in our current society. Assisted suicide, self-deliverance, auto euthanasia, aid-in-dying are all terms that deal with the choice of achieving a good death; the choice of deciding for oneself when it is time to escape unimaginable pain and have the chance to die with the dignity we all deserve.

Euthanasia is derived from a Greek words “eu” and “thanatos” meaning “good death”. According to Black’s Law Dictionary (8th edition) euthanasia means the act or practice of killing or bringing about the death of a person who suffers from an incurable disease or condition, for reasons of mercy. It is the practice of killing a person for giving relief from incurable pain or suffering or allowing or causing painless death when life has become meaningless and disagreeable. Euthanasia can be voluntary, that is according to the choice of the patient or can be a result of the decision of the patient’s family member, in cases where the patient is mentally incompetent or physically incapable of making a decision. It can be classified into following categories: