The Evils of Cosmetic Animal Testing Essay

Not only does animal testing save human lives; additionally, what people do not realize is that it is also used to find medications and treatments specifically for animals. Animals also have diseases that are different from human diseases that need to be treated. According to NAP of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, “In many cases, treatments have been developed specifically for animals. The ability to eliminate parasitism, treat illnesses, use anesthetic devices, and promote breeding has improved the

Animal testing has been around since ancient times and it's been used to benefit both animal and human health problems. Researchers would use animals at first out of curiosity to discover what was inside animals. However, after some time they started using animals for surgical procedures first performing them on them and then if they were successful on people. But in recent years there have been groups who condemn animal testing and categorize it as inhumane and cruel. They believe that people shouldn’t use animals for testing because its only for human selfish needs. They aren’t able to see the big picture they only see a small amount which is cosmetic companies using animals for testing but that's not the only thing animals are used in variety of experiments to help advance for the future. However, to the people that

In this paper there are three main topics that are going to be covered. They are alternatives to animal testing, animal testing in cosmetics, and the news in the cosmetic industry related to animal testing. For this paper there were four sources that were evaluated. All of them had a few things in common and through that it was easy to link them together through three different subtopics that will be evaluated later in this paper. The first source that I will be using is “The Science of Dermocosmetics and Its Role in Dermatology”. This article was written by Dreno, B., E. Araviiskaia, E. Berardesca, T. Bieber, J. Hawk, M. Sanchez- Viera, and P. Wolkenstein. The second article that will be effective in this essay is “New

Sure the final product may look pretty, but is it really worth it to test these products that could be toxic, on defenceless animals? When people go shopping for cosmetics they can never picture the product being meant for humans, being used on a defenceless creature such as a bunny or a mouse. The test are not as accurate as testing on a human. In most cases the animals are never able to live the life they were meant to. People using animals to test human products on is pointless for many reasons.

Everyday cosmetic products that many people use, such as lipsticks, shampoo, face wash, etcetera, are verified to be safe using animal testing. Chemical burns and other short term ailments are very serious concerns that plague Americans and the knowledge that the products they use will not harm them and their families is possible because of animal testing. Also long term effects, such as cancer, have been discovered through animal product testing and promptly stopped saving countless lives. “NOT TESTED ON ANIMALS YOU’RE THE GUINEA PIG” (Source C). Living day to day with the risk that the products trusted to use on your children and yourself is enough to validate

　　The companies such as the body shop said that they do not experiment on animals and they produce good cosmetics who make money, I am not agree that making the cosmetics that make our faces better does not mean the animals must suffering in terrible ways, it does not seem moral for me. On the other hand we also use the animals for test the new drugs.

The process of using animals for cosmetic products is unnecessary and cruel. We already have many of the same cosmetic products. Such as shampoos, hairsprays, deodorants, toothpastes, and mascaras. Do we really need more of these products if it results in the death of innocent animal? There are many brands that do not test on animals. Many of these brands being very popular in this generation, for example Bath and Body Works, Victoria's Secret, MAC, and Urban Decay. Why can't we be satisfied with the products we have now?

Many of us are unaware of the sheer number of animals that undergo constant suffering in the name of human vanity. Animal testing was originally introduced in the early 20th century and is still prominent today. It is morally unacceptable to experiment on animals for human purposes. The procedures used in animal testing are cruel and inhumane, nor are they the most reliable source of data; resulting in many mishaps. Moreover, with the perpetual advancements in technology, there are several alternative methods making animal testing unnecessary. If testing cosmetics and drugs on humans is unacceptable, what makes it acceptable to test on animals?

Animals lose their lives in a horrible way so that we can have useless things like makeup. A lot more brands use animals testing then society would think. By law before releasing a new medication it has to be tested many times on different animals first. One reason animal testing is horrible because it hurts them for not good reasons when there is more efficient ways to test products. (“Animal testing is a bad science”)

Over 100 million animals are crippled, burned, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year so people around the world can have red lips and winged eyeliner (“11 Facts About”). Cosmetic testing on living animals has become an outdated and cruel method of determining which products seem safe for the use of humans. This being said, animal testing is still prominent in the United States even though it is not mandatory to develop or sell products (“Cosmetic Testing”). Though better methods have been proven, other countries still require animal testing on any cosmetics being shipped into them. Their argument? Animals have been found to be the closest living beings to humans and, therefore, the most efficient

If they are testing for a really big cure of some sort, animal pain is the least of the problem(“How Much Pain..”). They also have stated that without research on animals, there would not be any progress to end the problems that people encounter. Also, that questions can only be answered by animal testing (“For and Against Animal Testing). Even the comments such as, “ there are so many animals, so why would it matter if some are used for research. It allows them to study the animal for the whole lifespan instead of a short amount of time” (“40 Reasons Why..”). All of these statements are based on opinions and not factual evidence. Just because an animal does not have a voice to speak and say no to animal testing, does mean that we should torture them. The computer testing statistics have proved that progress can be made without testing on animals. It is a much better way to have an animal pass away from natural causes than to have them die from pain caused by a human. There are proven facts that show that animal testing is not needed. If everyone was aware of the pain animals are put through, and the alternative methods, experimenting can be

In today’s society, there are billions of cosmetic products for sale. There are whole stores dedicated to cosmetics alone. Aisles upon aisles are lined with products designed to make a person look better, smell better, feel better. Behind those products though, there is a hideous truth. Those very products, designed to make a person beautiful, are tested on animals in order to be deemed safe enough for human use. Many organizations have campaigns to combat the issue. One such organization is the National Animal Protection Agency in Italy. The image above is one of their various campaigns to stop cosmetic testing on animals. Many of the aspects in the image above provide deeper meaning than what is realized at first glance and help provide more information on the topic.

Some people think that using animals for cosmetics,and testing cosmetics on animals is good and helps the animals and people, others think it’s wrong….. Women, who are the major consumers of cosmetics, largely oppose animal testing of cosmetics, with 72 percent of those polled opposed. Most women - 70 percent - think animal testing of cosmetics should be illegal. Strong majorities of women think animal testing of cosmetics should be illegal, regardless of age, level of education or ethnicity. 68 percent of voters know that animals are used to test the safety of cosmetics.Three in four voters say that they would feel safer, or as safe, if non-animal methods were used to test the safety of a cosmetic instead of animal testing. The survey of 802 U.S. registered voters, including 206 via cell phone, was conducted by Lake Research Partners from Feb. 5 - 11, 2013, and was commissioned by The HSUS and HSLF. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.47 percent. The questions and results can be viewed here.

Every year, it is estimated that hundreds of millions of animals are used for experiments worldwide (Cohn). In those millions, an estimated 100,000 to 200,000 animals are used to test cosmetics alone (Humane). Scientists shouldn’t be allowed to test cosmetic products on animals because it is cruel and inhumane, there are other effective alternative methods, and it isn’t necessary.

Millions of animals are being unneedlessly tested on for cosmetics, even though there are plenty of alternatives available and most of the results are unreliable or not applicable to humans. Although the fight against animal testing has made huge progress recently, America has yet to stop this cruel practice and chooses to torture animals while other countries are making a stop to the testing (“Animal Testing 101”).