The Evolution of Strategy at Procter and Gamble

One of the most important “dos” is for countries to pay renewed attention to the market selection which they are competing in. More precisely, these countries should focus on maximizing their opportunities where they can find cultural, administrative/political, geographic, and economic affinities. Companies use three different techniques to compete globally. These techniques are adaptation, aggregation, and arbitrage. According to Ghemaway, companies must be able to “vary products, policies, market positioning, and so on to suit local markets.” However, this method of adaptation is intended for companies which have large success and not those who have marginally. Another, important “do” is for “companies to externalize some of the costs of adaptation via franchising, joint ventures, or other types of partnerships.” Some “don’ts” are not put adaptation above all because it would get rid of competitive advantages and not to over-rely on localization. Relying too much on localization would hinder the value of across borders for a

Retaliatory competitor reactions as the company enters into new consumer product markets that have been dominated by major players as Procter & Gamble, Colgate-Palmolive, Unilever, etc..

The first recommendation for this firm is to adopt a global policy and try and explore new markets so that market growth and market share can be expanded. In case of a firm entering an international market, it requires to analyze the nature of the market and suitably form its marketing strategies in alignment with its business strategy and decide whether it is more beneficial to adopt a global approach or use a strategy that is customized to suit the needs of the local customers.

(2012). Chapter 7: International Strategy. In G. G. Dess, G. T. Lumpkin, A. B. Eisner, & G. McNamara, Strategic Management (pp. 257, 259-260). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

1.Briefly describe reasons for Phillips and Matsushita to operate internationally. Why do they do it?
Describe the international strategy of Phillips and Matsushita using the international strategy classifications we discussed in class (e.g., localization, transnational, global).

Global approaches are not always relevant to firms in the Asia-Pacific apart from alerting them to the nature of the international competitive environment in which they are likely to operate. A global approach is not an operating strategy for Indigenous small and medium scale exporters (SMEs) and is only partially appropriate for local subsidiaries of transnational firms.

Proctor and Gamble-Scope is faced with a very important decision, they need to prepare a marketing plan for P&G’s mouthwash business for the next three years. They want to know how they are going to be able to

Despite the inconsistent changes in spending from year to year, P&G’s market share consistently increased between 1% and 2% every twelve months (see Figure 1). The question is, with Unilever’s actions in regards to marketing expenditures, is the 15% increase going to be enough to restart P&G’s upward growth of market share?

The Procter & Gamble business strategy is to focus on creating new brands and categories so the company can focus on being the best in branding, innovation and scale. This is what sets this company apart from many of its competitors. The Proctor and Gamble are the global leader in all of their core businesses within the company which consists of laundry, baby care, hair care and feminine protection. This report is designed to understand the company’s business model and strategies, and analysis how the P&G has formulated its business-level strategies to pursue its business model.

2. Does SK-II have the potential to become a global brand within Proctor & Gamble’s worldwide operations? Why or why not?

As discussed in Chapter 21 of our text book, any company that is looking to expand globally must make five key decisions. A firm must decide if: a) they really want to expand to the international market; b) they

As a large global company, P&G has strengths that have helped them to acquire such a vast market share. The company’s culture, strong product quality, the ability to understand customers, brand equity, and centralized management is at the

Companies can decide to go global or to enter international markets for various reasons, and these different objectives at the time of entry that enable the business to produce different strategies and the performance goals, and even forms of market participation.

As trade increases hyper-competition grows forcing organizations to go global. By a company going global it requires them to rethink strategy and reform (Ananthram and Pearson, 2008). Global organizational structure is the way a company aims to merge local preferences with global strategy. The definition of global strategy is “strategic choices that have the characteristics of being globally uniform or integrated,” (Yip et al., 1997) such as standardization of products, uniform marketing, and competitive moves, but all globally (Townsend et al., 2004; Zou and Cavusgil, 2002; Bayraktar and Ndubisi, 2014). Global strategic strategy is a way to adjust to globalization. Globalization is “the economic and social process by which economies and communities grow inextricably interdependent “(Jhirad et al., 2009). The recent financial crisis (Das, 2010), large amount of poverty, and climate change are all problems that show how the world is globally connected because all countries impact each other (Jhirad et al., 2009).

What is your evaluation of Proctor & Gamble’s business lineup? How attractive are the industries it competes in? What is the competitive strength of each of its business segments? Does Gillette seem to compete in attractive consumer segments?