The Extent Of Success Of The Land Registration Act 2002

The proprietary right is protected by overriding interest under Section 70(1)(f) of Land Registration Act 1925 (LRA1925). Limitation Act 1980 stated requirement towards the squatter where he is in factual possession to the land for a period of 12 years continuously and is not objected by the land owner, he will obtain a title towards the land. However, Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002) brings changes towards this proprietary right where it provides a new set of rules which

The Land Registry came to the conclusion of employing a comprehensive system of e-conveyancing. The report produced a detailed outline of the anticipated model of e-conveyancing.

Indigenous people have long been denied the entitlement of land rights by Australia. Law reform has been both effective as well as ineffective in achieving genuine access and control of land for the indigenous people. Law reform aims to reinforce and strengthen justice, through the process of first examining existing laws, and by then revoking, amending or creating the necessary changes to a law. This procedure is acted in accordance with judicial bodies, by the result of case law along with statutory law. The Native Title Act of 1993 was achieved through statutory reform. This act took place by cause of the High Courts settlement of the second Mabo case of 1992. Although law reform has not been exclusively effective, it has been relatively

One of the key challenges facing the development of infra¬structure in India is the acquisition of land. Landowner¬ship confers tangible benefits such as shelter and liveli-hood, as well as intangible benefits such as security and a stand¬ing in society. Landowners are thus often reluctant to part with their land unless mutually acceptable terms including compensation are agreed upon. Problems arise when land is required for “pub¬lic purpose” and the state can invoke laws that allow for com¬pulsory acquisition through ‘eminent domain’ . Often, the land acquisition process is neither consultative nor transparent. Further, land-titles are unclear and identifying parties eligible for compensation is rendered difficult. Finally, the compensa¬tion, and resettlement and

Torrens title is a statutory scheme that was introduced by the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) and consequently abolished the problems inherent in the Old System title. One of driving forces behind the change was due to the uncertainty and cost instigated by a land transfer system, which solely relied on a chain of title deeds. This new system represented a dichotomy between registered and unregistered interests, and according to section 31B of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), the Registrar is now an integral part of the Torrens title. The Torrens system means that an individual will only need to construct a certificate of title for evidence of ownership, compared to producing an abundant of deeds. Therefore, when addressing the hypothetical problem question and dealing with multiple interests to the property, it is vital to consider the nature of the parties claims. This essay will address the issues raised by the hypothetical problem, by addressing the nature of the contracts of sale of land, indefeasible titles and the exceptions to such titles, priorities of interests, caveats and remedies available for mortgagees. Ultimately, we will be unraveling whose interests are prioritized over the property and the remedies available to those that have been negatively impacted by their interest over the property.

Historically, land ownership in America has been basing on the racial disparity and it still applies even now at the post-slavery periods. Though some groups of Americans have associated land ownership with American promise of liberty, equality and democracy, the promise of achieving liberty through this was not open to all. This is because earlier in history the black Americans had no right to own land and later when they were allowed to own, they were not allowed to do what they wanted with it. They were used as source of labor in the whites’ farms. They tended to be tenants of wealthy white landowners where they worked for sub-poverty wages and practiced subsistence farming. The government also imposed heavy taxation to the blacks who bought

There are a number of steps involved in the property title process. However, this has changed over the years due legislation such as the land protection act, introduced in the 1900s. Still, many of the original process steps are used today it requires detail gathering and documenting information. Nevertheless in the first step is the initial request for a title. Many times, it has performed out without involving and buyer Black (2001). However, this step perhaps identified as a task that records the land in its present state. Secondly, an on-site examination then performed. The steps are compiled in a detail report that reports on the legal property name, location and any tax information related to the property in question (Black, 2001)

The land and business interests in Western New York were highly connected to the politics of infrastructure. Land and Business interests lobbied the state government for the creation of canals and railroads, due to their tendency to increase trade and the value of land in the surrounding area. For instance, the agricultural developer and politician, Asahel Cole, of Friendship, lobbied for the construction of the Genesee Railway and was appointed by the state legislature to manage the project. By the time of the 1840’s the Whig Party managed to establish significant support among voters in the region by championing infrastructure projects as a means of economic development. In the course of 19th century, various railroads and canals were constructed,

Whether purchasing, or offering a home, picking the correct land operator or purchasers specialist, is the most critical stride to take. The way toward purchasing or offering a house is extremely itemized and troublesome. Notwithstanding the way that mix-ups can cost a lot of cash?

America in the 1700’s was a place of unsurpassed land opportunity. The colonial America provided thousands of potential acres to many Europeans; however, they did not have an organized system to sell this untapped land. America began to organize its first version of the stock market focused around the idea of land distributions. “ Land Speculation was in itself a driving factor of many business owners because of the vast foreign land that was not occupied yet” (Geisst 1). “As a result of this, land was viewed less for homeownership than for vending purposes” (Geisst 2). The colonial America could now offer new opportunities as well as investment options in agriculture and cash crops. The desire to own land and sell land was also inherent in

As the Special Economic Advisor, you are also pushing for radical land reforms. Your argument is that if a country has experienced a successful land reform program, it is easier for that country to implement export substitution policies. Elaborate on this argument using the contrasting examples of East Asia and Latin America

Sole proprietors, corporations, limited liability companies, and partnerships can receive, hold and transfer title to real property in the same

Land law holds a reputation for problematic and complex criticism, being built upon two separate, mutually exclusive, systems: the registered and unregistered land systems. The consistent application of law in this area depends upon adherence to legal principle, derived from a clear understanding of the law. First, this essay will consider a brief history of registration and the enforcement rules applying to registered and unregistered titles, looking at their distinct characteristics. Following this, their usage and application will be analysed, in order to place them into the wider context. Consideration of any differences present will enable us to see if rules regarding registered system of conveyancing are vastly superior, if at all.

There are two very different systems of dealing with both unregistered and registered land. In order to support the view that neither is superior to the other we must discuss why we have two different sets of rules. ‘The fundamental distinction between unregistered and registered land is that the basis of title to unregistered land is possession, whereas the basis of registered title is the fact of registration’ Within unregistered land, there is no register instead the owner of the land will have a collection of deeds showing an different transfers proving the devolution of the title. ‘

This essay will start by considering B’s position – how the Law of Property Act 1925 and Land Registration Act 2002 affect her interest in Y in relation to D’s interest. It will then move on to consider C’s position in a similar fashion. Finally, it will conclude with a critical examination of some of the legal principles applied.