preview

The Failure Of Soil-Nailed And Ground Anchored Systems

Good Essays

Soil-nailed and ground anchored systems, which respectively are classified as passive and active anchorages, are efficient stabilizing technics for slopes and excavations which have been widely used throughout the world in recent three decades. Ground anchored walls, are also referred to as “tieback walls”, can be more practical especially when lateral movements control are critical, for example where a sensitive structure exists near an excavation (Lazarte et al. 2015). The method involves some levels of pre-stressed grouted ground anchors, each one of which is a structural element installed in soil to transmit an applied tensile load into the ground. The basic components of a grouted ground anchor including anchor head; unbonded (free …show more content…

A slope stabilized with soil nails inclined at 10° showed better performance than a slope stabilized with soil nails inclined at 25°. Zhao et al. (2014) conducted some centrifuge tests to examine the role of passive anchors on the overall stability of a slope. The deformation and stress distributions in anchored slope models were monitored during the tests. It was observed that the passive anchors in the combined anchoring system contribute significantly to the overall stability of the slopes.
Smith and Su (1997) carried out a numerical study to examine the overall and internal failure mechanisms of a soil-nailed wall during construction, under service and ultimate loading conditions. When the surcharge was applied, the horizontal displacement at the top half of the wall increased more rapidly. The increased settlement under surcharge concentrated in the loading zone and the largest settlement observed to appear at the front of surcharge location at collapse. Briaud and Lim (1999) conducted a numerical simulation to study the effect of various design decisions for tieback walls. In advance of doing parametric study, the numerical model was calibrated against an instrumented case history. The results provided some information on the impact of the following components on the wall behavior: Magnitude of the

Get Access