Plan Colombia Essay

Most of us are familiar with these global terms “American dream” and “drugs cartels”. These thoughts exemplify one the differences between United States of America and Colombia. Despite United States of America and Colombia are located in the same hemisphere significant differences in food, natural resources and tourist attractions make each country quite distinct from the other.

Historically, Colombia has opposed the ELN and their attempts at gaining power within the country. However, there has been corruption by government and military officials. The corruption comes in the way of support for the ELN (Stanford, 2012). Regardless of the corruption, the Colombian government is currently making strides to begin peace talks with the ELN in 2014; however, no specific dates have been established. (Insight crime, n.d.).

“When officials come together to take some action, the result will most often be different from what any of them intended before they began interacting a group” (Allison and Philip, 1999, p. 258). On March 2007, George W. Bush made a visit to the Mexican state of Yucatán to meet the recently elected Mexican president Felipe Calderón. Moreover, in this state visit, Calderón made a point about the US’ lack of cooperation in the fight against drugs and “asked the United States to help fight the criminal mafias based in his country of his neighbor’s drug habit” (The Economist, 2008). The Merida Initiative (MI), made public on 2007, proposed aid for Mexico, Central America, the Dominican Republic and Haiti. The aid, of an economic nature, had the objective of bringing security to developing countries and for the US, the protection of their national

The large income distribution and long history of violence since 1980 has now increased more drug cartels have corrupted the law and the communist bad people have taken over a lot of the areas in the country. The land distribution led to large landless class Colombia have never had a government that supports when they distribute the land that they own. The struggle in the parties happened a lot since 1946 to 1964 that period made Colombia the most violent countries and people were scared to go because either they died or kidnapped them for money or for what they owed or anything they had or used. There was a conflict between the political parties but it was all going for power between Colombia leading families. In 1948 Jorge Eliezer leader was shot in the center of Bogota and probably killed, before joining the liberals he was a populist an had organized his own political party. During the civil war conservative and liberal parties more than 100,000 people were killed and the most destructive period was from 1948 to 1953 when 50,000 people were killed. In the mid-50s and mid 60s war took violence the protest against the abuse of the power of the conservation of congress and declared a state. Two of the most conservation buildings of most respected Liberal

When I was reading the newspaper the other, I saw headlines about Donald Trump in Nevada and the GOP debate. But I didn't find a single that mattered, a single article that showed what's happening in this world. We are covering up a burnt cake with icing. Not one article talked about a problem humanity is facing right now. Right now and for the past 70 years Colombia has been in a great trail for justice. The corrupt government, which does not recognize the war in public and the FARC rebels who are using atrocious ways to try to fight the government are abusing the citizens and using them as martyrs for their personal goals. On top of this already serious predicament, The assassination rate of unionists that are trying to stand up to these malfeasances is increasing staggeringly every year. Ladies and gentlemen, we are human beings, we have a responsibility to fix our own crimes. Our Country, the United States, and is the closest world power to Colombia and yet we are ignoring this grievous quagmire.

The United States and Colombia have had a long standing relationship through the course of history. There have been trade agreements signed by the two parties; also negotiations have taken part in regard to development strategies on the part of the US to promote the rule of Democracy and it’s institutions in Colombia, where illegal armed forces sought to control many aspects of the country’s development. Aside from trade agreements the United States and Columbia have also had agreements related to the protection of the environment, renewable energy, control of chemical weapons, and so on. We are going to discuss these concepts in more detail throughout the paper to determine the socio-economic and political relations between the two countries, and try to create a perspective for the future of the relationship between them.

In examining the transitions in US government policy related to drug abuse and trafficking, historians are consistently confronted with the difficult task of analyzing the different motivations for variations in strategy from the Nixon administration to the present. In this specific case, our investigation centers upon the interplay of United States foreign policy in Latin America in the 1980’s (pursued mostly by the CIA) and the broad campaign against drugs both at home and abroad. At first glance, one might suppose that a moral ideology such as the war on drugs would be a multi-faceted operation with little available room for compromise. After all, an analogous crusade against terrorism has emerged as the

Are you tired of cold weather? Would you like to live in a place where the temperature is 60 degrees and above? Do you want nothing but sunlight all year around? Colombia is the right place for you! It has no seasons at all. It has sunlight throughout the whole year. Colombia is one of the largest countries in South America. Researching about Colombia was a great experience! In this essay I'll be talking about politics and economics.

Later on, under President Barack Obama there has been significant changes since the Bush’s administration strategy was unsuccessful. Military cooperation with Colombia has increased with the Obama administration. Moreover, Obama focus more on rebuilding ties with other Latin American nations to decrease US strategic dependence on Colombian alliance. Overall, the administration and the US congress in 2010 has signaled intentions to turn over the majority of Plan Colombia’s responsibilities to the Colombian

The United States has preserved a long-standing relationship with Colombia and is patiently waiting to see the outcome. Colombia is a key geopolitical space in South America due of its numerous population, variety of valuable resources, deeply rooted criminal and drug trafficking structures, and its extensive border with Venezuela. In view of possible economic and social collapses in Venezuela, Colombia must remain a point of regional stability. Since 1999, the United States has invested $10 billion in economic and security assistance to Colombia. “Plan Colombia”, with steady bipartisan support, remains a major U.S. foreign policy achievement. Instituted in 2000 by the Clinton administration, the United States supported the initiative by committing $1.3 billion in foreign aid and up to five hundred military personnel to train Colombian forces. “Plan Colombia” dedicated 51% to institutional and social development, 32% for fighting the drug trade, and 17% for

Even though there is talk of peace between the state and the leaders of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (known by its Spanish acronym, FARC)” (Maddiloni 2009) , the country’s largest insurgent group which halted the violence in 2016, FARC remains active, and many of the smaller groups that are off shoots and fragments still cause havoc in Columbian cities. This process faces many challenges, including widespread public concern that the peace deal offers too much leniency to offenders of violence. But the deal’s backers are hopeful that the early phases of demobilization, which are already underway, will lead to a sustainable

Democratic prosperity for all is grounded by three pillars: more-employment, less poverty, and more security. This is how Colombia is fighting the most serious challenges of the nation. Consistently following theses three key pointers, foreign policy should be focused on the merging and reinforcement of institution; furthermore, they must be attuned to the changes outlined in the international system (Cancilleria,2008). The government has made special importance on achieving growth and competitiveness, equal opportunities, and peace consolidation, leading to a much bigger regional integration and diversity of the relations to the

This disconnect is a unique facet of Colombia’s Political and Social Relations. The FARC’s numbers have dropped substantially, from 18,000 in 2002 to about 8,000 at present, showing the FARC’s lost momentum and support of the people.. This eventuality indicates that the FARC will not seize control of the country; however it is important to note that they still play an important role in the power dynamic of the country. The organization does not maintain sociopolitical influence by official or legal means, but by the control they have over Colombians at a micro level. For example, the FARC’s supply of narcotics to Colombians, intimidation to support FARC (financing and recruitment), and the economic incentive to cultivate coca to support the lucrative drug trade. In addition to the internal political environment; foreign nations and the United Nations Security Council play an important part in Colombian politics. Peace negotiations have been in progress for the past four years, and at the end of 2015, a tentative peace agreement began to be implemented. Nations, such as the US, intervene in the conflict to support their own national interests, which in turn shapes the political domain of Colombia, as political power is influenced by external factors, and not just the actors within Colombia.

As the Drug Enforcement Administration Representative and as a member of the Council of Ministers a new method is necessary if we want to solve Colombia's problems and create peace.

The Colombian government’s strategy shifted, however, as the United States transitioned from the War on Drugs to the War on