The Fair Value Model

Your first attempt at generating the financial statements is commendable. I have outlined and included an analysis and recommendation to deal with each issue you identified in your notes. Attached is an Excel file in which you will find the correcting entries, the required adjustments to the draft Financial Statements and additional details related to calculations for the lease agreement.

The reason we want to capitalise the lease commitments is that reporting under operating assets leads to substantial amounts of off-balance-sheet assets and liabilities. Hence, it is difficult to compare financial statements between two similar companies but use different accounting methods for essentially the same transaction.

From the above classification we can see that all the points indicate that the leases undertaken by David Jones Ltd as a Lessee are Operating Leases or Finance leases and can be determined using the steps above. Being such a big company, David Jones Ltd has both Operating and Financial leases and they are taken mainly to run the firm’s stores and warehouses. Under the annual report for the half year ended 2013 it is clearly evident that the cost of leasing activities for David Jones Ltd has increased by 4.17mn. “Payments made under operating leases, where the lease agreement includes predetermined fixed rate increases, are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Other operating lease payments are expensed as incurred. Lease incentives received are recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Income as an integral part of the total lease expense and spread over the lease term.”

At the lease commencement, finance leases are capitalised at the fair value of the leased property, otherwise the present value of the minimum lease payments if lower (MHI, 2014). Other short term and long term payables include the relevant rental obligations and net of finance charges (MHI, 2014). Every lease payment is apportioned between the liability and finance charges (MHI, 2014). The finance cost is indicated in the comprehensive income statement for the lease period as well as to generate a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period (MHI, 2014). During the lease term, the depreciation is considered for the useful life of the asset such as the property, plant and equipment assigned under finance leases (MHI, 2014). The portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are persevered by the lessor are categorized as operating leases for leases (MHI, 2014). For the period of the lease, all payments made under operating leases less any incentives from lessor are indicated in the comprehensive income statement on a straight-line basis (MHI,

While working on a consulting engagement, a supervisor in the team has given an assignment. The client is a regional trucking company. A new customer has approached the client with an opportunity that would require 120 trailers—20 more than the trucking company currently owns. The client is uncertain how long the relationship with the customer may last, but the deal has the potential for significant growth. The supervisor has asked a research to be conducted on leases and lease structure issues on the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) website, in particular the current practice and thought related to direct financing, sales type, and operating leases. This paper is a memo addressed to the supervisor that summarizes

1. (Exhibit 1: Total Product) Between points A and B the marginal product of labor is:

Why did the FASB embark on a project to change the reporting standard for leases? Under the current financial reporting standards for leases, an entity has to determine the classification of leases to account for by applying bright-line rules. This creates a potential opportunity for management to structure leases in order to achieve a specific desired accounting results (FASB). In addition, the current accounting model does not require operating leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. As a result, investors may underestimate the assets and liabilities that arise from leases and, thus, cause an uninformed decision of investment. According to a 2014 study on public company filings, nearly a trillion U.S. dollars were reported in

10 states that an entity shall account for compensation cost from share-based payment transactions with employees in accordance with the fair-value-based method. Under the fair-value-based method, the cost of services received from employees in exchange for awards of share-based compensation shall be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued. A10-A17 discuss the acceptable methods of calculating fair value at the grant date. The grant-date fair value of the Murray options is $6. Following the guidance in Illustration 4(a), Share Options with Cliff Vesting, of FAS 123(R), compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2006 & 2007 is $200,000 per year (calculation attached hereto).

To find who is bearing the risks of receivables ownership, an analyst should carefully examine the details of the securitization or factoring transactions. Moreover, if the transactions are considered borrowed where the lender does not directly bear the risk of owning the receivable/security, then the ownership risks should be retained by the company. Essentially, companies who are facing different economic realities may choose similar accounting treatment being that it will satisfy the requirement under GAAP

The fair value of an asset is defined as ‘the price that would be received to sell an asset paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date” (Kieso, Weygandt, & Warfield, 2012). It is a market based measure (Averkamp, 2014). Over the past few years, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles has called for the use of fair value measurement in a company’s financial statements. This is what is referred to as the fair value principle (Kieso, Weygandt, & Warfield, 2012). The fair value of an asset or liability is based on an estimate of what the asset should be worth at the time of sale. This gives rise to some conflict among accounting professionals. It is believed that fair value may not be as accurate

Most important, the employees can earn stock, which gives them voice within the company to make pertinent decisions.

The international Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) initiated a joint project on accounting for leases in 2006, and revised the rules and made an explosion draft in 2014. This exposure draft shifted accounting for lease from an ‘ownership’ model to a ‘right-of-use’ model. The current accounting model report long-term leases as either capital or operating leases, depending on the leases contract’s specific terms. This rule helps company to avoid the assets and liabilities off the balance, whereas the new proposal require the leases of equals or more than one year to be capitalised. This change would influence the financial position and statement due to most operating leases become on-balance-sheet.

ACC307 INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT TASK 1: Contemporary Issues of Accounting Theory Fair Value Measurement Overview After the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) released the IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement in May 2011 for the purpose of completing its joint project with the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) on fair value, the Australian Accounting Standard Board (AASB) released the Australian equivalent - AASB 13 Fair Value Measurement in the September of the same year. This standard permitted early adoption but generally started to take effect for the financial reporting periods beginning from 1 January 2013. This new standard requires no new requirement for the adoption and but it was accompanied with the issuing of AASB 2011-8 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards arising from the AASB 13 which has made consequential changes to 32 standards and 9 interpretations for the adoption in Australia. The new standard attempts to unify IFRS and US GAAP by specifying how entities should apply the fair value measurements that applied in previous IFRS standards. It clarifies and redefines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date”, sometimes referred to as an “exit price”. It also sets out a single source guidance for a robust measurement framework to ensure that the requirements are applied consistently and have clear

Stock options provide a financial incentive to employees. If the company does well, then the employees benefit financially. Providing this benefit has the effect of the employee having a vested interest in how the company performs; therefore, the employee will work hard, do their best work, and stay

To meet the requirement, the 2013 exposure draft is aimed to improve “the quality and comparability of financial reporting” (IFRS, 2013, p.3). IFRS (2013) illustrated that “the core principle of the proposed requirements is that an entity should recognise assets and liabilities arising from a lease” That means changes took on the existing leases requirements that there is no need to let lessees recognise lease assets and lease liabilities. Besides that, a lessee may need to report liabilities and