The Family Structure Of The United States

Which marriages meet the requirements for dissolution is defined by legal standards. Over the last 200 years, the grounds for divorce in Western societies have expanded. These expansions have made divorce more accessible. Although the divorce rate has increased, there is not a clear link between the accessibility and this increase. Other key influences effecting divorce rates include economic, social, cultural, demographic and institutional factors.

Divorce also been more accepted today. Britain has one of the highest divorce rates in the Europe. The simple answer to a question why divorces are increasing in today’s world is that it is much easier to divorce and it is not as

There are a few reasons for this and here are a few of them. Firstly,

To go into more detail of the trend of increased divorces, in 1993, the number of divorces peaked at 180,000. By 2000, this figure had fallen to 154,000, although the years 2001 – 2004 have seen a gradual rise to 167,100. There is now almost as many divorces as there is marriages and if recent trends continues, almost 40% of marriages will end in divorce. An adequate reason for this increased style of divorcing is that it is no longer linked with stigma and shame. The British culture is hugely based on Christian beliefs and one of these

There are many different family dynamics in today’s society. But what really makes a family? Every definition found has defined family, in simple terms, as “A father and a mother raising their children together.” However, not every family is like that. Most families are not like that at all. Different aspects come into play in families such as divorce, death, and abandonment that can redefine the family structure, either for the better or for the worse. A family does not have to consist of the traditional sense of the nuclear family, but rather a family can consist of friends, step-siblings, step-parents, half siblings, or family members outside the immediate circle of parents and brothers and sisters. Anyone who can come together is a family;

Throughout time, practices that were once never used, become more common. In the 1600s divorce was a forbidden practice or a last resort. Since then, laws have changed, and so hasn’t the stigma related with divorce. The guilt and fault that divorce once carried has vanished. According to the book Should I Keep Trying to Work it out, “In the United States, researchers estimate that 40%–50% of all first marriages will end in divorce or permanent separation. The risk of divorce is even higher for second marriages, about 60%.” (Hawkins 42). As it became more common for couples in America to separate, divorce gradually became a normal part of so many lives. Why are so many couples separating now? Through research on EBSCO, and other findings, I will attempt to explain this question that so many people ask in today’s world. The divorce rate in America is drastically increasing over time due to new laws, certain generations, and relationship issues.

One of the big factors in the changing divorce rate has to be credited to the women leaving the housewife role behind and joining or rejoining (after small children are in school) the work force. In my grandmother’s era many women felt trapped in their situation because they were dependent on their husband’s income to support them and their children. Not as many women had college degree and so even if they went back to work their earning potential was very limited. According to Knox, a womans husband “Literally represented her lifeline. Finding Gainful employment outside the home made it possible for a wife to leave her husband if she wanted to. Now that about three fourths of wives are employed, fewer wives are economically trapped in unhappy marriage.” (2014, p 253) The other big factor was society and various religious groups were not very tolerant of divorcees in my grandmother’s time. If you

A total of five families will be participants in this relocation to Ripon Wisconsin and will be under my care for ninety days. Based on traditional family structures is has been deduced that each family will have on average five people, however we will not exclude families that have more than five members. I may come across this if the families want to bring with them extended family members such as grandparents or aunts and uncles. The families that I choose to bring do not necessarily have to be from Rwanda. During the genocide, there were Hutus who left the country because at the time it was not a good place to live and they fled to the surrounding countries. Some of these refugees stayed in those countries, while others went back to Rwanda only to face suspicion and scrutiny due to the genocide (Fisiy 1998). Due to this, I will be considering families in both circumstances, but I predict there will be more families wanting to leave Rwanda due to tensions still in the country. I plan on moving the families to Ripon at the beginning of August so they have a whole month of summer before having to adjust to cold Wisconsin temperatures. Along with letting the families adjust to the temperatures, I have picked August so if any of them want to attend any sort of school they can start with the rest of the state avoiding having to start at an awkward time.

The nuclear family is defined by Conley as a “familial form consisting of a father, a mother, and their children” (Conley, 2015). I believe that this is still the traditional family form in the United States, though there are many variations possible and frequently occur. Nuclear families have always existed from antiquity, but there also have often been variations since antiquity. The most frequent variation would be a single parent family due to death or divorce. There also have been many children adopted or cared for by family members due to death or abandonment, such as when a grandparent assumes care for and guardianship of their grandchildren, or when orphaned children go live with their aunt and uncle.

Why did divorce rates raise concistently in the late 1960s and the 1970s and then stabilize at relatively high ranks in the 1980s? There is no simple explanation for high divorce rates, but several contributing factors stand out (Cherlin, 1992; L, K, White, 1990). One was chances in the divorce laws; no-fault divorce made it easier and faster to end a marriage. The movement of women into the labor force was another factor – in part because jobs made women feel freer to divorce and in part because two-worker families may experience more role conflicts than breadwinner-housewife families. At the same time, men’s position in the labor force was impaired; middle-class men wrestled to keep the relatively high standard of living their parents enjoyed;

Within the summary of our society, Deedocracy takes elements from the U.S.A., and twist them to fix the problems we faced on Earth. Our family structure is neither patriarchal or matriarchal. We leave this up to every family to decide. Children are the main concern and should come before all else. The educational system is trade based. Students recieve your average education until they turn 16. They have to take a test that will sort them into what field of study they will enter. There are five leaders that run the entire government, Grand Leaders. They are advised by 20 others, Word of the People Council, who are voted in democratically. Each town has a male and female co-counselor that run the city governments, they are voted in by the people. The economy is capitalist, but instead of using a paper currency, we pay in good deeds. People are rewarded with things by the government for following the rules of the world, and working.We still have businesses and your good deeds can be traded for food, and other things. This is the basis of our religion Deedism, we read the Book of Deeds, and follow the rules of the book accordingly.

It is obvious to see that the number of divorces in 2000 increase twofold in comparison with the number in 1970. As can be known by the first chart, the percentage of people getting married dropped considerably to around 60% reducing 10% against 1970. The people In widow also declined marginally. The number of people never getting married and divorced rise exponential are some of the reasons why the people getting married in 2000 declined more than

When Mintz states “…. that diversity and change have been the only constants in the history of the American family” (Mintz 1), I believe he meant despites the challenges, family roles, and the power dynamics has changed greatly over time. As divorce rate increases, the decline in birthrates, and more married women entering the competitive workforce has contributed to the revolutionary change in the American family. In the beginning of the article, Mintz sheds light of the developmental changes in the American family life since the late 1960s. Such as a spike in divorce rates, single parent homes, and as well as children being born out of wedlock.

Monogamy was out, ‘free love’ thrived, and divorce represented freedom. Enough people wanted divorce by the late 1960’s that the pressure was on to change the law.

The sanctity of marriage has seemed to have disappeared with the arrival of the 21st century. Though marriage rates have always fluctuated in the past, current events have caused divorce rates to increase. According to recent statistics made by the census bureau, the divorce rate in America is roughly 50 percent. There are a myriad of speculations as to why more people are not staying together. One reason is that people are getting married for the wrong reasons, such as unplanned pregnancies. Another reason is that women have become more independent so that they are not forced in to being in a marriage where they are not happy. Last, lenient divorce laws make it much easier for many couples to get divorced. Combined, these three