The Federal Funding Of Embryonic Stem Cell Research

1554 Words7 Pages
The subject in this article is about the federal funding of embryonic stem-cell research. The argument is about Research on human embryonic stem cells and the development of therapies for chronic and debilitating diseases. The question is should the federal government of the United States provide funding for the stem cell research? The thesis of the argument is “others worry that even if research on embryos is not wrong in itself, it will open the way to a slippery slope of dehumanizing practices, such as embryo farms, cloned babies, the use of fetuses for spare parts, and the commoditization of human life.” Michael J. Sandel, D.Phil. is the writer of this article. Michael J. Sandel teaches political philosophy at Harvard University. His writings—on justice, ethics, democracy, and markets--have been translated into 27 languages. His course “Justice” is the first Harvard course to be made freely available online and on television. It has been viewed by tens of millions of people around the world, including in China, where Sandel was named the “most influential foreign figure of the year.” The reason to believe in this argument is this point of view can be divided into two: considering embryos worthy of protection simply because they are human or considering them as potential persons. Philosophers differ on this question. Whereas many philosophers, particularly utilitarian’s, do not consider a fertilized human egg before implantation to satisfy the criteria of personhood,
Open Document