The Federal Information Security Management Act

Another step involves security checks upon implementation and describes agency-level threat to the business scenario or the mission. It similarly entails sanctioning the information system for processing and lastly constant monitoring of the security controls. FISMA and NIST's standards are aimed at offering the ways for agencies to achieve their identified missions with safety commensurate with the threat (United States Department of Agriculture, 2015). Together with guidelines from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), FISMA and NIST create a framework for advancing and growing an information security scheme (SecureIT, 2008). Such framework includes control descriptions and evaluation, program development, and system certification and accreditation. The final objective involves conducting daily functioning of the agency and achieving the agency's articulated objectives with sufficient security commensurate with risk.

FIPS PUB 199 Standards for Security Categorization of Federal Information and Information Systems is the current

The Department of Homeland IT security policy must be uniform, stable, consistent, efficient, effective and compatible with best practices Information Security in the Department. It is the purpose of this security policy to create and implement the best security plans, strategies, and practices throughout the Department. Also, it is the intention of this policy to create safe and secure Cyberspace.

Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) – This refers to a U.S. law that was enacted in 2002 to lay down a comprehensive framework on how government information are protected. This also relates to operations and assets against natural or man-made threats. This act assigns responsibilities to federal agencies that re responsible for system and data protection, ensuring that all elements of FISMA are complied to, and integration of security measures throughout federal agencies in cost-effective, timely and efficient manner (. FISMA regulations require that inspection of the agencies be done annually through an independent evaluation (Gibson, 2010, pg. 59). The evaluation seeks to test the effectiveness of policies and practices in agencies and compile a report that identifies the state of compliance of that agency.

Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) is a U.S. federal law for Information Security, enacted in December 2002, with the intent to protect government information against any natural or man-made threats. It is also referred to as Title III of the E-Government Act. This law would want each and every federal agency to document, develop and implement an agency-wide program to provide Information Security for the Information Systems that support the operations and assets of the agency. This act requires chief Information officers and the head of each agency to conduct annual reviews of Information security programs and submit the results to OMB. The purpose of conducting reviews

The constantly evolving technological landscape is posing a big challenge for institutions to comply with various Acts like FERPA, HIPPA etc. Institutions have started appointing Chief Information Security

Within this security profile three controls and two family controls were selected to be enforced in order to explore the security awareness and the training being done that can be used as counter measures against any cyber security threats that may pose a problem to the network. The three controls that are being examined within management, technical, and operational families will be based on the needs of the VA and how best to implement them.

With the increasing use of the internet to perform organizational functions to deliver services to the public, the federal government saw the need to improve customer service in 2002. The enacted E-Government Act of 2002 required federal agencies utilizing information technology to become citizen focused, establish a chief information officer (CIO), develop and meet security requirement in accordance with the Federal Information Security Act (FISMA), protect confidential information, and support electronic government initiatives (Bolten, 2003). The legislation required agencies to develop their IT infrastructures to meet the needs of the public and link information systems agency-wide. Additionally, the conversion and management of electronic records would improve the communication and accessibility of information for the federal agency, employees, and the public.

Evaluations of computer security published since July 1999 continue to show that federal computer security is fraught with weaknesses and that, as a result, critical operations and assets continue to be at risk. As in 1998, our current analysis identified significant weaknesses in each of the 24 agencies covered by our review. Since July 1999, the range of weaknesses in individual agencies has broadened, at least in part because the scope of audits being performed is more comprehensive than in prior years. While these audits are providing a more complete picture of the security problems agencies face, they also show that agencies have much work to do to ensure that their security programs are

The Department of Defense (DoD) is America 's oldest and largest government agency, with military traces dating way back to pre-Revolutionary times. The Department of Defense has since grown and evolved with the nation, hence becoming the national’s largest employer with over 1.4 million active duty soldiers, 1.1 million National Guard and Reserve forces, and 718,000 civilian personnel. With such a huge organization does come with a huge network, and security infrastructure network, and the burden to protect the information transferred or stored on that network. This means information is a strategic asset to the Department of Defense; it’s therefor the goal of this security policy to provide guidelines of implementing

Technological advancements in recent decades have drastically affected many aspects of American society; our government is no exception. With a rapidly growing population, it is imperative that we maximize the efficiency of government organizations, while also being mindful of financial burdens. Technology is allowing government organizations to make relevant information more readily available to American citizens, which can reduce the amount of one-on-one time each customer requires with a government employee. The use of the Internet, I believe, has made the most significant change to how we are able to deal with government organizations. Many tasks that used to require mailing letters or meeting someone in person can now be accomplished online. Despite the various positive impacts technology has had on government organizations, there are unfortunately some negative aspects that require attention as well; for example, security concerns. More money must be allocated for cyber security advancements as people learn how to take advantage of modern technology. We’ve seen in the recent Wiki Leaks hacks during the 2016 Presidential Election that hacking can dramatically affect situations within the United States. The Obama Administration formed the Internet Policy Task Force to investigate privacy concerns, copyright issues, cyber security, and virtual economy

The Federal Government needs to create information systems which are more effective shielded systems to protect their assets and resources at home. The foundation of any mandated cybersecurity strategies that secure our nation national security must incorporate worldwide or state local threats whether targeted toward the federal government or the private sector forces. The OPM breach highlighted the insufficient and inconsistence security approaches the federal government has already used in modernizing the existing cybersecurity policies. There is a requirement for the United States government to institute polices that would incorporate and implement new government cybersecurity structures and centralized the protection of their assets to avert future breaches (Source). Examining the inadequacies in the current national cybersecurity policies and regulations is disappointing as OPM choice to implement these mechanisms and the current authoritative propositions to cybersecurity must change immediately. It was reported that OPM only spent $2 million in 2015 to avert pernicious digital assaults, while the Department of Agriculture spent $39 million. The Department of Commerce, Department of Education, and Department of Labor likewise invested more money in cybersecurity resources than the Office of Personnel Management. The Small Business Administration devoted a similar amount into cybersecurity to recognizing, examining, and alleviate any cyber breaches as OPM, however

Department of Defense – Key contributor on multi-agency working team tasked with addressing Department of Defense network isolation and secure information sharing issues. As a Systems

Establishing an effective Information Technology Security Policy Framework is critical in the development of a comprehensive security program. The purpose of the Information Security Policy Framework is to insure your organization will be able to provide the minimum security level necessary to maintain confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the information it collects and uses.

Designing a working plan for securing the organization s information assets begins by creating or validating an existing security blueprint for the implementation of needed security controls to protect the information assets.  A framework is the outline from which a more detailed blueprint evolves.  The blueprint is the basis for the design, selection, and implementation of all subsequent security policies, education and training programs, and technologies.  The blueprint provides scaleable, upgradeable, and comprehensive security for the coming years.  The blueprint is used to plan the tasks to be accomplished and the order in which