The Federal Mogul Goetze Limited

during year 12 and year 13. However, in year 13 and year 14 total current assets fell

In 2007 the company was generating cash from everyday operations but the statement of cash flows shows that the company has had a negative profit from 2006 to 2007, but this is because More Vino has expenses that are higher than their sales

From the last two decades auto industry is growing more competitive. Competition from the foreign automakers like Toyota and Honda is also high. In

In the financial year that ended June 2013, the total revenue was lower than that of 2014. The breakdown of

Operating expenses: I will not analyze every subsection, but will focus on important parts that paint a clear picture of why a gain or loss occurred in the revenue section. Advertising money spent between year 6 and 7 increased 37.5% or $8,940. While the increase in spending is a weakness, it is a strength because the company demonstrated positive growth during the same period; likely due to the advertising of new product. The only negative finding for the company during the analyzed period is the 37.5% increase in money spent to grow sales. The number seems rather large but the increase in money spent to advertise was under $10k and yielded an increase of $447k. Advertising clearly was a good invest

operating profit reached $396.7 million in FY2012, an increase of 47.6% over FY2011. Also, the net

$59k, compared to a budget of $83k. YTD non-operating revenue was $693k compared to a budget of $751k.

By using the consolidated income statements, balance sheet and cash flow statement, we can assess the company’s financial position. On the income statement, the company’s operation revenue increased by 4.5% ($393.4 million) from year 2006 while its operating income decreased by $65.1 million in the same period. Without considering the net-cash settlement feature expense recorded in 2007, operating income increased $103.6 million. Even though including the net-cash settlement feature

•) from FY1976 onwards, net income fell continuously - in FY1978 net loss of 262US$m due

The annual budget 2011/12 yielded a profit for the company, however, by looking into its quarterly performance it will be noted that the organisation will incur a net loss.

The automotive component & Fabrication Plant, ACF, was the original plant site for Bridgeton Industries, a major supplier of components for the domestic automotive industry. All of the ACF’s production was sold to the Big-Three domestic automobile manufactures. Its main competitors were local suppliers and other Bridgeton plants. This company did very well but recently it became less effective when foreign competition and scarce, expensive gasoline caused domestic loss of market share. For boost its selling, it made four criteria, quality, customer service, technical capability, and competitive cost position to evaluate three classifications of products.

The reason is that the company’s expenses exceeded the revenue. Company’s assets have been increasing compared to last year total assets. There hasn’t been a dramtic change in liabilities because the company doesn’t have enough cash to pay its debt.

2. Was cash flow from operations greater than or less than net income? Explain in detail the major reasons for the difference between these two figures.

The Net Profit Margin in 2012 was 10.5% while in 2013 it was 66.6%. This increase in the Net Profit Margin can be attributed to the increase in net profits after taxes despite the fact that there was a slight decrease in revenues.

This work is done to study the improvement of the quality in automobile industry. This chapter consists three sections named as “Problem definition”, “Objectives” and “Methodology of the study” respectively. The section 3.1 named as “Problem definition” describes the challenge or difficulty that is to be solved. The solution may be achieved after fulfilling the objective by using some sub-objectives that are described in section 3.2 named as “Objectives”. The methodology described in section 3.3 in details. This methodology has been devised keeping in mind the view of “Problem definition” and the “Objectives” that are suggested for the fulfilment of the solution for the problem.