The Field of Organizational Development

Daft explains Organization Development as a three-step process that involves unfreezing, changing and refreezing (Daft, 2014). Overcoming resistance to change occurs during the unfreezing stage where “people throughout the organization [are made] aware of problems and the need for change. This stage creates the motivation for people to change their attitudes and behaviors” (Daft, 2014). Participation of those directly affected by the change has been shown to be the most effective technique in reducing resistance to change and minimizing the disruptive period of organization readjustment that naturally follows any change in the workplace.

http://adh.sagepub.com The Evolution of Organization Development at Cornell University: Strategies for Improving Performance and Building Capacity

Organisation Development is about ensuring the organisation has a committed ‘ft for the future’ workforce required to deliver strategic ambitions. It plays a vital role to ensure that the organisation culture, values and environment support and enhance organisation performance and adaptability. It also provides insight and leadership on development and execution of any capability; cultural and change activities.

Organizational Development (OD) is an approach to improve efficiency and effectiveness within an organization. While historically OD has been practiced in a planned way( (Bushe et al, 2015, p.xv), but with changing times OD consultants believe that instead of using a linear, top down approach, practitioners should use a holistic and humanistic approach…

Organisation development(OD) is a planned process of change in an organisation’s culture through the utilization of behavioral science technology, research and theory (Warner Burke, 1982). It also refers to a long range effort to improve an organisation’s problem solving capabilities and its ability to cope with changes in its external environment with the help of external or internal behavioral-scientist consultant or change agents (Wandell French, 1969).

As an Organizational Development Practitioner, there are several phases to conduct their job obligations; such as: the consulting phase, and the entry phase. Therefore, both are needed for the OD practitioner to become productive and beneficial for the client (s). The first step to the entry level is to describe the services that will be offered to clients, and inform the clients of the expectations and any potential delays that may occur while exchanging services, and give the clients a survey and to help determine their needs and concerns. Based on the research collected during this phase, and knowing the needs of the clients, sending a brochure so there

Social intelligence has been defined as the ability to understand and manage other people, and to engage in adaptive social interactions like making them to get along with you. Social intelligence entails a person's awareness to a situation and the social dynamics that accompany the situation and the knowledge of the strategies and interaction style, that, he/she can use to achieve the desired objective while dealing with others (Bob, 2008).

In order to have a successful outcome to occur from an organizational development intervention the organization must be acceptable of change. The organization’s readiness must be evaluated. To evaluate the readiness for change a combination of three different measures will need to be implemented, which are observation, surveys, and interviews

As leaders incorporate these practices and behaviors, it is critical to be mindful of how we go about processing change. A key learn from the Organizational Development module was planning changes, processing, engagement, and training of staff is critical for a positive outcome. Understanding how employees react to situational changes can prevent an otherwise bad outcome if not handled appropriately (Burke, 2011).

Organizational change is usually triggered by relevant environment shift, either internal or external, that sensed by companies and leads to intentionally generated response (French, Bell & Zawacki, 2006). This paper will discuss several organization development models..

Organization development is quintessential to an organization’s success as it is purported to improve an organization 's ability to manage change through effective and collaborative relevant stakeholders of organization culture. Organization development is defined as a system wide application and transfer of behavioral science knowledge to the planned development, improvement, and reinforcement of the strategies, structures and processes that lead to organization effectiveness (Cummings & Worley, 2009, p. 2). Furthermore, Cumming and Worley described organization development intervention as a sequence of activities, actions, and

Organizational development or OD as it is widely known is a collection of change methods that try to improve organizational effectiveness and employee well-being. Change especially in a business environment is inevitable. Change can be a hard process with anyone especially when something has worked for you for so long. Organizational change can be difficult for people you’ve been with an organization for years and adapting to something new can be scary. Organizational development with any company is good because anything that can strengthen the employees will strengthen the company.

In observing the Franklin Company, it is evident that there is a need for change to help the company with its present problems. The managers’ perception is that the organization is in a state of volatility. Which has resulted from a lack of growth in sales and a competitive advantage. There is a felt need to ascertain new ways of doing things. In the Franklin Company situation, it was revealed that every department has its own ideas and feel they have the right answers to overcome their problems. They all want to play an important role in the company growth, however they have different perspectives on how to fix things. No matter what level of professionalism is involved, conflict is inevitable. For example, there are several issues that hinders the departments communication, collaboration and trust. In order to implement change, all three key element need to be present but they are often hidden. After the meeting with the management team, a OD practitioner decision was made to plan and implement structural, technological and behavioral strategies to improve the condition and functioning of the Franklin Co.

Organization development grew out of the human relations traditions of the 1940s and 1950s, and it has had enormous influence on management practices and thinking about how organizational effectiveness can be achieved. Critical manpower and resource shortages faced by all organizations, public and private, during World War II and in the immediate post-war years stimulated a search by social scientist and managers, separately and in cooperation with one another, for effective means to maximize the utilization of existing individual and organizational resources. (Ritcher, I 2007). Organization Development was by tradition about planned change efforts, instituted to enhance organization effectiveness within the context of the traditional, hierarchical, management-as-experts, top-down era. The legacy of leaders and organizations developed in this context remain. Organizational Development is about how organizations and people function and how to get them to function better. Organization transformation signals the need to transform mindsets, engage people and make the deep shift to the ongoing mutual learning environment needed for the long-lasting change characteristic of our world today.

Organizational development (OD) is an application or process of building a greater level of efficiency within the organization. OD develops the ongoing effort geared for long-term effects. OD works to help management and employees on a variety of levels. Organizational development is perhaps unequaled in its ability to meet any type of organization needs. However, the solutions developed from the role of OD may not be necessarily interchangeable with different organizations (Grant, 2010).