The Financial Industry: Bear Stearns

Additionally, when America’s economy was melting in 2008, the Federal Reserve played a big role to stabilize it. Besides the Great Depression during the years 1929 through 1939 the worst economic time for the United States, 2008 was unmistakable one of the worst years of America’s economy history. When this economic recession was taking place, the Fed had to take action to avoid another depression and to stop a fall from the financial system. With the help of the Federal Reserve J.P. Morgan Chase and Co.’s they planned to help Bear Stearns (an investment bank) with financial assistance to help the government to buyout AIG, a well-known insurance company. This helped to produce a strategy targeting to stabilize the credit market and also the short-term interest rate from 45% to almost 0 from the benchmark (Coste). Thanks to the Federal Reserve and their well design plan to avoid another recession they prevented the economy of the world or better known as Macroeconomic system from falling and getting it

Bush on October 3rd, 2008. Some of the recipients of this bail out were and continue to be large financial institutions including Wells Fargo & Co., JP Morgan Chase & Co., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., and Morgan Stanley. In this situation the banks are not only able to continue risky behavior, but take little to no responsibility for their actions in causing such a situation. Fundamentally, if the financial institutions were bailed out once it has set a precedent for other financial institutions to view and believe that taking part in risky behavior will not affect them in the long run.

I appreciate that the banking sector is vital to the strong health and growth of our nation’s economy and directly affects each of us, however, many of these financial institutions took the funds and immediately paid out senior executive bonuses instead of using the money to back loans to the public. These executive bonuses were public record and created a massive outcry from the taxpayers, but even this seemingly greedy use of power was overlooked by the federal and state governments.

These losses necessitated governmental action in the financial markets. Companies such as Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns lost all of their stock’s value and were forced into bankruptcy. This risk spread throughout the American banks, forcing the American government to step in and buy all of the securitized, troubled assets from the balance sheets of

All the firms turn to the hedge funds but failed and to bail the banks, Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke asked the congress for 700 billion dollars.

The Federal Reserve made emergency loans to the big companies in order to prevent large banks from failing when their investors frightened. With the stock market crashing, on October 3, 2008, President George Bush signed the Troubled Asset Relief Program into law. TARP used 250 billion dollars of federal money to “bail out” the banks, and later automakers including General Electric. Government-working accountants reviewed large Wall Street banks’ balance sheets and disclosed to the public which were sound in order to instill more confidence within investors.

An individual that played a part in the crisis include Banker Angelo Mozilo of Countrywide, his stated goal was to lower the barriers for American’s to own homes. Though intentions in such a goal are admirable, it created an environment of failures as homeowners defaulted on loans. Countywide was purchased by Bank of America in 2008. Banker James Cayne of Bear Stearns faced criticism as his institution crumbled under his leadership. He was accused of being absent as hedge funds collapsed. As an example as poor leadership during the period he stepped down, and Bear Stearns was purchased by JP Morgan in 2007. Richard Fuld Jr., Banker of Lehman Brothers Holding Inc., moved his institution in the commercial real-estate market years prior to the 2008 collapse of the market. 2008 after filing for bankruptcy Lehman’s was also sold. These are just a select few of the institutional leaders that had an impact during the crisis, but they represent how different personal and organization ethics can impact a company. Other key players involve elected officials that made key decisions to share the nation of financial depression. Henry Paulson, a policy maker with the Department of the Treasury, refused to save Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. from bankruptcy. Paulson was involved in the Troubled Asset Relief Program that was used for the bailout of banks, auto companies, and other financial institutions. Ben Bernanke, a policy maker with the Federal Reserve, was a key player in approving the funding for J.P. Morgan to purchase Bear Sterns Co.

The relative successes and failures of that Act are becoming more apparent with time, and the shortcomings are subject to intense partisan criticism. As discussed below, Dodd-Frank seeks to address the highly sensitive and controversial notion that Wall Street banks have been designated by the Federal Reserve as too-big-to-fail. In fact, during the most severe moments of the crisis, the voices of free market proponents could be heard advocating that these troubled big banks, suffering massive losses due to their own bad bets, and if weakened to the point of failure, should be allowed to fail. Hindsight shows that allowing just one to fail, Lehman Brothers, had serious and lasting detrimental effect on the US and global financial system and markets. Had Lehman been saved, it would have been the most effective agent to unwind all of the transactions and trades to which it was a party, and likely in a rapid manner. However, being thrust into bankruptcy, and thereafter receivers were appointed to unwind the business, took months upon months and vast resources to settle Lehman accounts. Had Citibank, Bank of America, Bear Stearns, or AIG been allowed to fail, it may have been possible that the US financial system would have melted down completely. So these super banks, and non-banks, cannot be allowed to fail in crisis, due to the system-wide risk. Notwithstanding, such an implicit assurance, that they will always get a bailout, no matter how toxic

The Lehman Brothers, another investment bank, also encountered failure due to rumors and toxic investments. Due to the Federal Reserveʻs assistance to Bear Stearns, Lehman brothers expected the same treatment, which Henry Paulson denied to them. As a result, markets failed and the entire system was jeopardized. AIG, the largest insurance corporation in the nation, also needed loans to avoid bankruptcy. Ben Bernanke then lent them 85 billion dollars, which meant that the government had 80% of ownership, and essentially controlled, the largest insurance company. By the end of the crisis, Paulson and Bernanke had no other option than to spend $700 billion dollars to aid all of the major banks, which ultimately contradicted their principle of opposition to government intervention. Even after this plan had been implemented, there was still uncertainty on whether or not all of the money spent would suffice to salvage the financial

The banking crisis of the late 2000s, often called the Great Recession, is labelled by many economists as the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression. Its effect on the markets around the world can still be felt. Many countries suffered a drop in GDP, small or even negative growth, bankrupting businesses and rise in unemployment. The welfare cost that society had to paid lead to an obvious question: ‘Who’s to blame?’ The fingers are pointed to the United States of America, as it is obvious that this is where the crisis began, but who exactly is responsible? Many people believe that the banks are the only ones that are guilty, but this is just not true. The crisis was really a systematic failure, in which many problems in the

These bankers and investors knowingly caused one of the worst economic recessions in American history and they were barely punished for

However, after five years of the financial crisis happened in 2008, is the “too big to fail” problem being solved or controlled? Jim Puzzanghera who published his article on Los Angeles Times insists that banks considered too big to fail are even bigger now. Puzzanghera provides his opinion based on the data he collected, “Just before the financial crisis hit, Wells Fargo & Co. had $609 billion in assets. Now it has $1.4 trillion. Bank of America Corp. had $1.7 trillion in assets. That's up to $2.1 trillion.” Puzzanghera explores that one main concern of coming out with a solution to this “too big to fail” problem is that Democrats and Republicans rarely reach an agreement on the problem. Most Democrats are willing for the federal authority to seize the power and to get rid of the firms if they are too big to fail while most Republicans do not want to force the banks to shrink. In stead of regulating those big financial firms, “the government's new power to seize large financial firms teetering near collapse could result in them being rescued instead of shut down, in effect enshrining

Extensive research has determined that the banking industry is in an unstable state. The industry’s profits have

| #3 Paper- Case study: What is Up With Wall Street? The Goldman Standard and Shades of Gray

However, if the US government decides to help Lehman with taxpayers’ money, including those amounts paid by Idaho citizens, this case will become a practical joke. The other investment institution will consider that they can invest on risky business without worrying about the business failure, since there will be money support from the government. I agreed that the government should rescue Lehman since their collapse will have a huge effect on US economy, but utilizing taxpayers’ money is not the right way to support a personal business. Instead, the government could help Lehman by endorsing Lehman’s business deal with international firms that have sufficient funds to rescue the collapsing business. The Idaho citizens can be assured that the US government won’t