Essay on The First Amendment

While presented through an amendment in the Bill of Rights, the right to bear arms has been and continues to be a subject of controversy often due to the advancement of firearms over time, and overall vagueness of the Second Amendment. Examples of vagueness discrepancies are often found in interpreting the concept of what it entails when supporting a “well-regulated militia.” The development of firearms has also proven to be a major subject of debate as modern day weapons are significantly more advanced than what existed during the creation of the Second Amendment. Lastly, the argument of which citizens the Second Amendment should protect or not protect based on their criminal background or other factors has been an ongoing debate. These subjects do not cover all aspects of debate surrounding the Second Amendment, but have been tried in many Supreme Court cases and are subjects of controversy in modern politics.

The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America is one of the most controversial. The Second Amendment says, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." There have been many arguments over the amendment's meaning and interpretation. There are those who interpret the amendment to mean it provides for people as a whole monitored by the military, while the other view is that it provides individual rights to the people. The controversy brought on by the Second Amendment is it does not clearly define whom "the people" are. Ambiguity has left room for action by legislators and the courts to pass laws and make interpretations

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees American citizens. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people

The first amendment gives us personal rights. We have the right to speech, expression, and religion. Because of this, American citizens can believe in whatever religion they want. But are all those religions treated equally? If we can believe in whatever religion we want, why do we say “one nation, under God”, in the pledge of allegiance? Does that mean the government is biased, and keeps religion a factor in settings like court? What about in schools? In the first amendment, we have the freedom of speech and religion. However in schools, students lose the freedom of speech, but not religion, even though they are in the same amendment. What about in modern society? Are all religions seen equally through the eyes of everyday people, or have stereotypes changed the first amendment?

The 2nd amendment in the constitution says; A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. And people often debate about what this means. I believe that the 2nd amendment of the constitution is stating that people have the right to bear arms, providing they are part of the militia. I think this for 3 reasons, the first reason being the definition of the word militia, the second reason is what we use our militia for in the U.S, and the third is when we would need a militia at this point in time.

The 1st amendment of the United States Constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” When the Framers of the Constitution wrote the 1st amendment there intention was exactly was to prevent the government from interfering with States’ rights. More specifically, the Framers intent was to allow citizens to speak freely without violating the law or public policy. However, the Framers did not intend the 1st amendment to be a gateway for citizens to say whatever they want, individuals can still be censored. We can find

In 1787, when the Constitution was initially drafted, the First Amendment was not included, moreover there were no Bill Rights. However, we saw where this could leave an open door for a stronger central government to deny the rights of the people. The First Amendment did not allow to make laws that would infringe upon the right to religious freedom, speech, freedom of the press, and the right to assemble. Furthermore, the First Amendment as it pertains to religious freedom, which says Congress could not pass any legislation concerning the forming of a religion, or persecution for practicing your religious rituals. Most American would say that freedom of speech is the foundation in which a democratic society provides the minority a voice, in

It is with a heavy heart I write this. I took a few days to recover after staying up until three in the morning, tears running down my cheeks, hoping that what CNN was proclaiming was not reality.

The United States Government First Amendment States that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting establishment of religion, or prohibiting the exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peacefully to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Therefore, I believe this artwork should not be able to be shown in a campus environment. There are several reasons why my decision is the best choice on not accepting this piece of work into Francis Marion University. The first reason is this artwork is not protected by the First Amendment of the United States of America.

The First Amendment is one of the most beneficial amendments in our constitution. The 1st amendment was the first amendment ratified by congress. Its was ratified in the year 1791. The first amendment protects your five basic rights: freedom of speech, religion, the press, assembly and petition. This means that the government can’t set up an official church for the country or review and edit newspapers before they are printed. This amendment is essential to having a successful government. Imagine our government without the right to petition a law or act you think is wrong or have an assembly with local politicians. This amendment is important to me personally because I am a Muslim, a minority the U.S. So without the freedom to practice whatever religion I want, my family and I would not be a able to live here. This is why the 1st amendment is critical to me, and the rest of the United States.

The First Amendment protects citizens’ right to practice whatever religion they choose, to assemble peacefully, to have freedom

Because of the First Amendment, we can share our opinions to others about anything we feel or think, we are free to practice our religion how we want, we have a right to ask for changes in the government, we have a right to gather in public or private places, and television, newspapers, magazines and media sources can publish truthful reports without interference from the government.

The First Amendment states, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

In First Amendment “Congress should make no law regarding the foundation of religion, or disallowing the free practice or shorten the flexibility of discourse, or of press or request of legislature for change of objection, right of individuals to aggregate”.

The first amendment to the constitution was ratified in December of 1791 and proclaims that “Congress make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,or of the press;or the right of the people peaceably to assemble , and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Whilst the first amendment has guaranteed some very important rights, they can also be very limited and are unable to provide a blanket right to religion, speech, press, and to assemble.