The First Human Papillomavirus ( Hpv ) Vaccine

While practitioners can use their best judgement to identify other factors that may put a child at risk for an adverse reaction, there will inevitably be some cases that fall through the cracks simply due to a lack of knowledge. Some people with rare, little understood metabolic conditions—for example—might react unfavorably to an HPV vaccine, resulting in severe side effects (Menni, Chiarelli, Sabatini, Principi, & Esposito, 2012). Merck’s Gardasil 9 prescription manual reported a 1.0% incidence of “vaccine-related adverse experiences”; adverse symptoms included “pyrexia, allergy to vaccine, asthmatic crisis, headache, and tonsillitis” (Gardasil 9, 2014). This raises a difficult ethical dilemma: Is it justifiable to force a typically healthy behavior on a significant portion of a state’s residents, knowing that a small minority can become severely ill as a result? In addition, many would agree that the vaccine has not been tested sufficiently in minority populations in the US. Clinical trials for Gardasil and Gardasil 9, for example, consisted of primarily white participants (Gardasil 9, 2014). Clinical trials for Gardasil included .1% and .3% American Indians in the 9-26 y.o. male and female clinical trial treatment groups respectively. These percentages correspond to about 10 and 30 participants respectively (Gardasil 9,

Taking away a person’s right to choose can leave them feeling violated and disempowered. Taking away a parent’s right to choose what is best for their child can be even more disempowering and frustrating. A number of people are experiencing such frustration as a result of Governor Rick Perry’s mandate that all young Texas girls must be vaccinated for the HPV virus. In both, “HPV Vaccine Texas Tyranny” by Mike Adams, and “The HPV Debate Needs an Injection of Reality” by Arthur Allen, the authors disapprove of the vaccination mandate; while both articles differentiate in tone, justification of the mandate, and reliability of sources.

The HPV vaccine has always been controversial. When the vaccine first debut in 2006, many parents felt that the vaccine was only for sexually active teens, and their children did not fit that mold. Others felt that the vaccine was dangerous and refused to be vaccinated. Unfortunately, the stigma around the HPV vaccine still stands.

Utilizing the Health Belief Model, research has found many different factors that influence beliefs and compliance behavior with the HPV vaccine and some interventions that might increase compliance. In a study done by Kelly Rhea MacArthur evaluating the role of trust in HPV vaccine decision making among college students, it was found that perceived severity and perceived efficacy are two barriers that can be addressed by forming a trusting relationship with a health care provider (MacArthur, 2017). Trust in the health care system can be complicated and involves widely spread distrust in pharmaceuticals in the media and social influences of friends and family. One study done evaluated the effect that media and specifically YouTube videos

Throughout the last decade there has been a rising epidemic of parents choosing not to vaccinate their children. One of the most common vaccinations that is not being administered is the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine, commonly known as HPV Vaccine. Childhood immunization involves a balance between parents’ autonomy in deciding whether to immunize their children and the benefits to public health from mandating such vaccines. Ethical concerns about pediatric vaccination span several public health domains, including those of policymakers, clinicians, and school administrators. This rise in reluctance has provoked the “Personal Choice vs. Public Health” debate among many decision making public institutions. There are many reasons why parents choose against the administration of the HPV vaccination among their children. Three many oppositions to the administration of the HPV vaccine are, the HPV vaccine encourages sexual activity among youth, parents feel

A study by Gerend et al. addresses the common perceived barriers regarding the HPV vaccine, including: adverse effects from the vaccine (55%), vaccine safety (46%), not enough knowledge about the vaccine (37%), not enough research (36%), have not gotten around to getting the vaccine yet, but plan to (36%), and more. The authors suggest that tailoring the conditions in which the participants receive their information regarding the HPV vaccine would increase the likelihood that they would be more willing to accept and adhere to the three-dose vaccine regimen.6

The information provided by student Cheryl Gordon pertains to today’s society. The world is getting smaller therefore the risk of contracting an illness increases significantly. Government officials have created many reforms in order to make the necessary and positive changes to have at least the majority of children vaccinated before they enter the school system (Capron, 2015). These precautions have been mandated due to the increase research of the benefits of vaccinations. Children that young are more susceptible of contracting more illnesses. This is why it is important for them to be vaccinated against preventable diseases. One example is the recommendation for routine HPV vaccination for females 11-12 years of age (Klein & Luedtke,

HPV stands for the human palliloma virus. It is estimated that there are around 100 different types of HPV. The HPV virus can cause lesions to develop on the soft palate, tonsils and tongue. It can also increase the risk of certain forms of cancer, including oral cancer and cervical cancer.

If I told you that Human papillomavirus (HPV) was the most common sexually transmitted disease in the United States and if left untreated could cause 70% of cervical cancers, would you want children to be required to get the vaccine? (Sourced) HPV vaccine is very controversial, not only because it is starting to be mandatory in the U.S but also because it is only mandatory for female children to get it. Researchers claim that the cancers associated with HPV cost $3.7 billion in 2003 alone. (Source) Cervical cancer is the second most lethal cancer to all women but should it be mandatory for only one gender even though men can carry it as well? (source)

Today, views about healthcare, specifically about vaccines, have taken a 180 degree turn since the mid-1900s. A vaccine is a medical preparation given to people to provide immunity from a disease (“Vaccine”). Around sixty years ago, scientists discovered the Polio vaccine causing the serum to be rushed and distributed across the United States. Parents would stand in line for hours to get their children the vaccine. Back then, vaccines were extremely popular. Now the number of kids being exempt from vaccines has only increased, especially in Oklahoma. In the past ten years, the percentage of all kindergartners in Oklahoma that have not received any vaccines rose from .3% to 1.1%. That means that roughly around 550 kindergarten students remain unvaccinated

Great post! Immunization is such a controversial issue. A recent article from ncsl.org stated that since the 20th century immunization is one of the most cost-effective public health achievements. Immunization not only protects the individuals, but the population as a whole, especially those with immune system disorders who cannot be vaccinated. Each state plays a significant role in determining the policies surrounding immunization. Lawmakers face many policy issues related to vaccines and immunizations including school requirements and exemptions, vaccination financing, and vaccine safety.

The discussion section reiterates the primary purpose of this article. However, it also overlooks key data in the discussion and results sections. The prime focus is on how successful they have speculated the outcomes of the parental attitudes towards using the HPV information and the HPV vaccine. Again claiming that those in the intervention group who received the additional information reported a statistically significant increase and their perceived benefit repeatedly laid out in survey gaining 43% more likely to accept the HPV vaccine. However, more data is revealed in the descriptive and qualitative feedback section. Consequently, while the purpose is stated, generally did not determine value of the tested

The Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a common sexually transmitted disease that infects the ano-genital tract of both males and females (Rubin, Kuttab, Rihani, & Reutzel, 2012, p. 1145). “A substantial burden of cancers and anogenital warts are attributable to HPV in the United States: in 2009, an estimated 34,788 new HPV-associated cancers and approximately 355,000 new cases of anogenital warts were associated with HPV infection” (CDC, 2015). The Gardasil quadrivalent vaccine was created to prevent the transmission of HPV. This vaccination is usually administered to adolescents between 11-12 years old and is a three dose series given over the course of six months. As a result of the extended vaccine period many patients are not completing the

This journal article examines that school is a significant situation for HPV vaccination to introduce and argues that coverage rate and the valuable experiences strategy from different countries and performing a deployment. Human Papilloma Virus is the primary risk factor for the disease. In recent decades, cervical cancer can influences 88% female deaths in developing countries. WHO suggests that HPV vaccination will become a part of the national immunization programs, because this vaccine can prevent the death of women in the 60%. So, HPV vaccine delivery strategies are taking place in many regions and they also strongly urge that all women who are between 9-20 years get a full HPV vaccination. (p.320)

McLeod, C. (2014). Rising Anti-Vaccination Attitudes in the United States: A Plea for Paternalism. Texas Public Health Journal, 66(4), 8-10. Retrieved from