preview

The Fish

Good Essays

“This poem dramatizes the conflict between appearance and reality, particularly as this conflict relates to what the speaker seems to say and what the speaker really says. Elizabeth Bishop’s poem, The Fish displays her relationship between her and the fish. From the boat the speaker is looking at the fish, she explains that she caught a tremendous fish and she held him beside the boat. Lines (1-2). The speaker notes that the fish is half out of water, she points to several specific descriptions about the fish. “With her hook fast in the corner of his mouth, he didn’t fight, he hadn’t fought at all, and he hung a grunting weight battered and venerable and homely.” (3-9) After describing the “battered” aspects of the fish, she asserts that the …show more content…

Immediately we know the speaker is fishing and that she has caught a tremendous fish. “I caught a tremendous fish, and held him beside the boat.” Lines (1-2) Automatically, we know the setting which is on a boat in some sort of body of water. Also, we can connect the title and the first line in the poem. We can infer that the fish was just caught, hence the speakers statement, “half out of water, with my hook fast in a corner of his mouth.” (3-4) The speaker has yet to remove the hook from the fishes mouth. These lines also introduce us to the real physicality of the sport, fishing. It can definitely be thought as, cruel and painful. Can you imagine, a hook in your mouth? Ouch! Bishop wants us to emphasize on the first interaction in the beginning of the poem. As you can see, she creates a relationship between the fish and herself, the fisher. She writes, “my” hook in “his” mouth. (3-4) I feel her tone in lines 3-4 express her ownership to the hook. It makes it more personal. Lines 5-6 use imagery to focus on this poor fishes, lifelessness. It’s clear to see the despair he has. “He didn’t fight, He hadn’t fought at all.” (5-6) Line 6 highlights line 5. It seems to me the speaker is somewhat shocked. It’s not likely that you catch an enormous fish and they don’t even put up a fight. Lines 5 and 6 reflect Bishops stylistic ways, line 5 says, “He didn’t fight at all and then she will adjust her wording in …show more content…

Like I’ve mentioned before, the speaker uses this beautiful language to describe things that are not so appealing. As she states, “He was speckled with barnacles, fine rosettes of lime.” The way I visualize her description of the “rosettes of lime” is something of a delicate nature, beautiful and ancient like the wallpaper that was mentioned in the previous lines. (10-11) Here is where the conflict between appearance and reality comes in. This conflict relates to what the speaker seems to say and what the speaker really is saying. Once you step back and analyze the text, truly the fish isn’t so attractive. When the speaker mentions “rosettes of lime” again, she uses imagery to convey how old the fish really is. Her reference in line 17, gives us more affirmation that this fish has been in the water for many years, long enough to accumulate alkaline build up on his skin. This again, paints a clear picture, leaving us to see the barnacles attached to him and the discoloration of his skin from the alkaline. Lines 18-21, describe the gross features of what this poor fish has inherited within his many years living in the water. “And infested with tiny white sea lice.” Bishop left us with a more pleasant thought of the fish in lines 16 and 17 when she spoke of his skin as rosette patterns opposed to now when she brings us back to the realization of this tired, old, battered fish. Sea lice, by the

Get Access