The Fixer: Yakov Bok

Raskolnikov confesses his crime to her, and through a very slow process is on the way to confessing his crime once and for all. Yet, even upon his occurring it is clear that Raskolnikov partially did it as a matter of practicality based on the influence of the case’s investigator, Porphyry. It is only through Sonia’s unflinching love for Raskolnikov that he is eventually transformed to love God and realize that this is the only true

First, let me introduce you to the main character himself otherwise known as the murderer in this story. Raskolnikov is the main protagonist of the novel, making the story in his point of view. He is very alienated from society due to his

“They walked and talked of the strange light on the sea… talked of how sultry it was after a hot day” and discussed employment and birthplaces (897). After departing from Yalta, Chekhov details Gurov’s dreary life of “children [having] breakfast and getting ready for school… entertaining distinguished lawyers... walking his daughter to school” (901, 905).

Furthermore, in Leo Tolstoy‘s The Death of Ivan Ilyich, and analysis will demonstrate that the character Ivan Ilyich struggles throughout his life to achieve the ideals of liberty, life and the pursuit of happiness. It is through Ivan’s death and his friend’s narration of Ivan’s life that the reader comes to the realization the the middle-class Ivan has few strength’s besides his hard work to drive him towards his ideals for wealth and property. Ivan lived his whole life with the purpose of enjoying himself. He did this through winning power at work, spending money, buying things to impress his friends, throwing parties, and playing bridge. His pursuit of happiness in material things and pleasures is so great that his deliberately avoids anything unpleasant. This means that when he settled down with a family, which was expected of him, he never grows close to them.

The plot begins with the introduction of the protagonist: “a young man named Oleksandr.” He wants to see rusalky. In fact, “it was all he could talk about or even think about.” He considers seeing one, and even though everyone told him “not to do it,” he would “quietly continue his scheming.”

We formed a special bond with Nabokov despite the difficulty of his prose. This went deeper than out identification with his themes. His novels are shaped around invisible trapdoors, sudden gaps that constantly pull the carpet from under the reader’s feet. They are filled with mistrust of what we call everyday reality, an acute sense of that reality’s fickleness and frailty (293).

There are very few people in the world who are willing to go against the popular trends and do what they feel in their hearts is correct. But Yevgeny Yevtushenko is one of those people. In his poem Babi Yar, he tells the story of the modern persecution of the Jews, focusing on atrocities like those of the massacre at Babi Yar and the pogroms at Beilostok, and also the general anti-Semitism that killed men like Dreyfus and pervades the entire Russian people. The poem uses many literary devices, such as graphic imagery and contrasts, while painting a very clear picture of the scenes of pure horror.

Babi Yar, a poem written by Yevgeny Yevtushenko, tells the story of the Nazi invasion into a small part of Russia, in which, throughout the duration of World War II, over one-hundred thousand Jews, Gypsies and Russian POW's were brutally murdered. However, what is unique about this particular perspective is that the narrator is not a Jew, but a mere observer who is aghast at the atrocities that took place during the Holocaust. It is through allusions, as well as other literary devices, that Yevtushenko elucidates caustically the absurdities of the hatred that caused the Holocaust, in addition to the narrator's identification with the Jews and their history of oppression.

The protagonist, Rodion Romanovich Raskolnikov, a former student, decides to murder and rob an old pawn broker, Alyona Ivanovna, not due to his desperate need of money, but due to a theory he wants to test. Raskolnikov leaves no evidence which would lead the investigation to him; however, the police lieutenant in charge of the case, Porfiry Petrovich, a meticulous thinker, understands Raskolnikov’s theory and has a big role in influencing the student to confess. Between the murder and the confession, Raskolnikov undergoes a long and painful process of thought. His friend, Razumikhin Prokofych, along with a prostitute and his future significant other, Sonia Semyonovna Marmeladova, are part of the protagonist’s path. In the end, Sonia turns out to be Raskolnikov’s salvation as she helps him find redemption and start living

Dmitri Dmitritch Gurov is a middle-aged banker living in Moscow with his wife and three children. He is “…unfaithful [to his wife] often..”, a serial adulterer who speaks ill of women and refers to them as the “lower race”, yet cannot “…get on for two days without [them].” Gurov believes he can keep on with his affairs with no ramifications because after meeting he has, it simply “…slip[s] out of his memory…” and he goes back to his family, until he feels the urge to cheat again. Since his philosophy has always proven to be true, he thought his time in Yalta would be like his other “experiences”. This is when he meets Anna Sergeyevna.

In Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s, Crime and Punishment, the conclusion of the novel plays an important role in resolving and reconciling a multitude of conflicts within the characters. For Dostoyevsky, the resolution of the story plays a significant purpose not only in resolving the various crimes committed, but additionally acting as a moral reassessment for the characters that helps the audience reflect upon their own morals as well. Accordingly, through Dostoyevsky’s portrayal of the troubling abuses committed by the characters due to their lack of regard for the law, a large portion of the novel emphasizes the concept of a universal morality that should be intrinsic to humanity. Through the analysis of the repercussions of Raskolnikov’s crimes, Svidrigailov’s crimes, and the juxtaposition between them,

In One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Alexander Solzhenitsyn portrays the fictional rendition of a single day’s conflicts for a Zek within a Stalinist labor camp. Conflict aids the novel by allowing the reader to better understand the endeavors the prisoners experience. To express the conditions within the gulags, Solzhenitsyn shows how Ivan survives his agonizing daily tasks. From working through frigid temperatures to trudging through the surroundings of snow and ice, Ivan and the other prisoners labor through the harsh elements with their minimal strength in order to complete their assigned duty. Another conflict occurs by the Zeks against each other. Distrust runs high, making gulag life more difficult. The men also commonly

How many people are empathetic to the sufferings of those around them? How many people actively work to alleviate the pain of those in compromised situations? Furthermore, how many people still continue to help others when they themselves are down? Very few people could honestly declare that they do all of those things, and that is probably because it is difficult to have such a heightened sense of both human dignity and selflessness. But Yakov Bok, Jewish man living in Kiev at the turn of the century, is both selfless and ethical. In tsarist Russia in the early twentieth century, millions of people, particularly Jews, were being persecuted against. The Fixer tells the story of Yakov Bok's wrongful imprisonment for the alleged blood ritual

While Dostoyevsky employs a wide array of characters in Crime and Punishment, he makes sure to develop each’s characteristics fully and intriguingly. There are some more involved than others, some more lovable than others, and some more compelling than others. He particularly shows the dynamics of the complex character of Sonia by portraying her as a sweet, naive, and religious girl who unknowingly submits to a dark side--she is willing to follow and be loyal to a murderer.

But it is also this spiritual deterritorialization that follows Nabokov throughout his life that makes his account of his life seem more artistic and disconnected, even if there is a profound emotional impact on the reader in the end. While some moments in his life might evoke sympathy, like his retelling of his father’s death, or make readers to take a side, such as the incident with Nesbit during his time in Cambridge, Nabokov keeps the reader at a distance by concealing his feelings in rhetoric. An example of this is the “short biography” (173) of his father. Using vivid details to describe his father, one can feel the spiritual resonance the experience had on Nabokov. “And behind it all there was yet a very special emotional abyss that I was