eric Foner is a history professor at Columbia University, who speciality is in the Civil War and Reconstruction era. He has written many pieces and had many successful publication, and received many awards. Foner is a very passionate man when it comes to the Reconstruction period that occurred after the American Civil War. He wrote a piece entitled “The New View of Reconstruction” which dissects the reconstruction whether the reconstruction succeed or failed. Foner wrote about the political issues, such as the fight between President Johnson and congress, and the new amendments that were created. And the fact that African-Americans were slowly becoming more equally, and organizations were being created to terror anyone supporting the equality of African-Americans. Throughout the reconstruction era the nation had to rebuilt itself as a unified nation, and making many decision that not everyone agreed with.
President Lincoln’s plan was having ten percent of the Confederates states swear
…show more content…
Radical Republicans prevented former Confederates from voting by not counting for them in congress. President Johnson vetoed many laws that the Radical Republicans wanted to pass and the republican would override the veto by a two-third vote. The republican were able to pass thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendment. Thirteenth amendment was created to abolish slavery. Fourteenth amendment addressed the citizenship rights and equal protection for freed blacks. Fifteenth amendment establish the state government from preventing any citizen to their right to vote based on the citizen’s race. Radical leader Charles Sumner and Thaddeus Stevens worked on plans for black's right. The 14th and 15th amendment inspire the future efforts for civil right. Eventually, Congress attempts to impeach President Johnson, but lost one vote to impeach the
Eric Foner’s epilogue discusses the effects of reconstruction during, as well as after it occured. He highlights many different main points as he weaves his way through the piece. One of these points is the issue of race that sprung up during reconstruction. The South felt that the black’s place was in the fields while the North gave them the right to vote and made them a free man. This is discussed through different accounts between some white men and some black men.
In his essay, Eric Foner argues that Reconstruction influenced much of our modern day ideology and, while not perfectly effective, still made great social changes in postwar America. He states that it led to greater powers of the central government, more rights for African-Americans—before, as per the Dred Scott Decision, they had not been considered American citizens and therefore had not had the rights pertaining to all citizens of the United States—and ultimately helped to establish the social and political systems that exist in America today by questioning the powers of the government, who citizenship should be extended to, and the true meanings of freedom and equality. After reading this, my perception of Reconstruction has been both
Eric Foner’s A Short History of Reconstruction is a shortened version of his Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877; however, in the shorter version certain broad themes unified the crucial narrative. His first theme is the midst of the black experience, second theme is to trace the ways Southern society as a whole was remodeled, third theme is the evolution of racial attitudes and patterns of race relations, and the fourth theme is the emergence during the Civil War and Reconstruction. This narration of Reconstruction begins not in 1865, but with the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863. This was done to stress the importance of the Proclamation in unifying two major themes, grass-roots black activity and the newly empowered national state and to indicate that Reconstruction was the beginning of a broadened historical process: the adjustment of American society to the end of slavery.
The Reconstruction time period, 1865 through 1877, was a complex time for America. The southern part of the nation was in need of governmental, economical, and social repair after losing the Civil War. Radical Republicans, Democrats, and newly freed African Americans all were influential in the age of Reconstruction. Historians have struggled to put into words exactly what Reconstruction incorporates and precisely what the motives of the different groups of people were. Renowned American historian, Eric Foner, is a professor at Columbia University. He has written many books concerning the Civil War and Reconstruction eras. Eric Foner’s Reconstruction theory
Radical Republicans, who identified as the anti-slavery and pro-reconstruction wing of the Republican party, were another key group driving transformations in the country during this time. They had a bold agenda: to punish the south for the Civil War, ensure the complete elevation of former slaves to the current standards of American society, and to prevent the Democrats from ever gaining another foothold in the south. To do this, they set out to pass the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments. The amendments forbade slavery in the United States, guaranteed equal protection under the law and citizenship to anyone born in the United States, and ensured the right to vote for all men over the age of 21, respectively. They also supported the Freedman’s Bureau,
The Radicals success resulted in their decision to create the 14th Amendment in 1866, which limited the power the president had in office by giving Congress the power. The bill also gave citizenship to black males and prohibited states from restricting these rights. When Johnson left office and Ulysses S. Grant was elected the Radicals realized how important the black vote had become. For this reason, the 15th Amendment was passed in 1870, which gave any U.S. citizen the right to vote regardless of race, color, or previous condition of servitude (Schultz 2014).
Mainly, Radical Republicans in Congress pushed various pieces of legislature on behalf of African Americans. They began by passing the Civil Rights Act of 1866, nullifying the Black Codes and guaranteeing individual rights to blacks in the South (Cassanello). Yet with Black Codes gaining the backing of half the nation, it was hard to put words of protection into action. Congress continued with the the 14th Amendment, adopted in 1868, which guaranteed citizenship to African Americans, and equal protection before the law. Following this was the 15th Amendment in 1870, granting blacks and freed slaves the right to vote (“Civil War and Reconstruction, 1861–77 (Overview)”).
In “Reconstruction Revisited”, Eric Foner reexamines the political, social, and economic experiences of black and white Americans in the aftermath of the Civil War. With the help of many historian works, Foner gives equal representation to both sides of the Reconstruction argument.
Although the Civil War of 1865 has ended and African Americans were given their freedom due to the Union Victory, conflict was still arising. Reconstruction was a major “milestone” as some would say in our history. Reconstruction gave light to the trials and tribulations that were apart of the south. Pre civil war south was known for their rigorous amount of slaves and their labor, post civil war south was known for their resistance against freed slaves and their soon to be citizenship. In Johnsons (2012) Reading the American Past Vol 2: from 1865, readers are exposed to a number of excerpts from this era that may or may not shed unseen light on this crucial period in history. Carl Schurz Reports on the Condition of the Defeated South, Black Codes Enacted in the South, Former Slaves Seek to Reunite Their Families and Klan Violence against Blacks are documents that allow readers to see first hand what was endured by many in the reconstruction era of 1863-1877.
However, it had been used to grant all the personal liberties and rights conveyed in the Bill of Rights. Among other things, this prohibited ex-Confederate leaders from holding political office, and also gave the freedmen their citizenship. The rejection of the 14th Amendment paved the way for the Reconstruction Act of 1867; this dismantled all Southern governments and launched military control over the South. The Reconstruction Act guaranteed freedmen the right to vote under new state constitutions and required the Southern states to approve the 14th A With the addition of African American votes in the southern elections and the help of "Carpet Baggers" and "Scalawags," the Republican Party gained almost complete control over the South.
The Reconstruction era was the period that followed the end of the Civil War whose purpose was to reconstruct the United States. This was done to help rebuild the South and bring it back into the Union. The 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments gave African Americans some civil liberties, they prohibited slavery, gave national citizenship for every person that was born in the United States, and voting rights can not be denied because of their race or color. Looking at this era, I will discuss how it affected the society of the Americans, the economy and the laws that were passed. Although the Reconstruction Era tried to help from the end of the Civil War into the early twentieth-century it resulted a failure to establish the civil rights for the African Americans.
The reconstruction era was a difficult time for the African American slaves from 1865 to 1877 because the slaves were freed and there were no jobs for them, had very little or no education, and had very limited opportunity in the south. Reconstruction was one of the most critical periods in American History. The Civil War changed the nation tremendously, and most importantly by bringing an end to slavery. Reconstruction was a period of great promise, hope, and progress for African Americans, and a period of resentment and resistance for many white
In Appomattox Court House, 1865, the Civil War concluded, ushering in the Reconstruction Era. Approximately one week after, John Wilkes Booth, a radical southerner, assassinated President Lincoln. The Reconstruction Era, which ended when Rutherford B Hayes ceased its enforcement to keep the peace, was a time for the country to consolidate and forgive the wrongs of the past. This Reconstruction period included many lasting effects on the governing of America. However, it shattered the welfare of southerners, Freedmen, and the general public. Additionally, discrimination ran rampant in the newly reunited country. Reconstruction was successful in the government, but not fiscally nor with public unity.
America was in disarray following the events of the Civil War. Southern economy was in shambles while congress was struggling to find a middle ground between the radical republicans and Lincoln’s lenient policies. Many Southerners faced the aftermath of uprooting their society and their way of life while thousands of newly freed slaves struggled to find a way to support themselves. The country needed a strong leader, however on the 14th of April, 1865 President Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth in the Ford Theatre in Washington (Farmer). Without the man that had once held the nation together, the country now faced an enormous obstacle; reconstructing American economics, politics and social life.
Throughout history, America’s historical consciousness has always been in debate. For example, the Revolutionary war (1776-1783) was pivotal in the creation of the United States, and on other hand, wars like the Civil war (1861-1865) proclaimed the type of nation the United States would become. The Civil war cleared up this debate by answering two fundamental questions, the first one being: Would the United States become a dissolvable confederation of sovereign states or instead an indivisible nation with a sovereign national government? And the second one being: Whether or not the nation that claims via declaration, that all men are created with an equal right to liberty, will in fact remain one of the largest slave holding countries in the world. As time would tell, the United States has become an indivisible nation and has also relieved itself of this contradictory title of slave owning.