Arguments For FAO Research

GMOs are awful for your well being, are very harmful to the environment and the animals that live in the wild, and they are harmful to the future of society. While some may say that GMOs are helping the earth by fixing world hunger this is not true, GMOs are doing more harm than good in our society. Imagine what will happen if we continue to eat these foods without knowing it, they will continue to harm our body and the earth in the future. The real question is, will there be a

Imagine this, a customer sitting down at a restaurant and ordering their favorite meal. The meal consists of corn, chicken, and a soft drink. All of these foods and drinks have GMOs, but the customer does not know what the repercussions are to themselves. The consumption of GMOs is detrimental to our bodies because of the unintended effects, the immunity to antibiotics, and the harms caused by pesticides.

Global health is detrimental to maintaining a healthy world for future generations. Our everyday meals impact our physique, as well as our health as we get older. With the increase in GMOs, our food production has grown exponentially and it keeps growing by the minute due to population growth. Consumers are the main target, it is why GMOs have been so successful. GMOs are being injected to all food without anybody really acknowledging or questioning what GMOs are really made of. Everyone seems to only care about the mass production of food. The mindset all consumers have about GMOs is wrong because they are not thinking about what GMOs really do to their food or the long-term consequences of eating food with GMOs in it. GMOs are not labeled in our foods, that's because big industries are not 100% sure of what consequences GMOs have on human consumers.

While these are valid concerns, they are entirely wrong. According to the World Health Organization in 2005, “GM foods currently traded on the international market have passed risk assessments in several countries and are not likely to present risks for human health” (Novella). Many of those who are anti-GMO claim that GMOs are not safe because they do not know enough about them or they have heard far too many conflicting reports. While there are many reports that claim that GMOs are detrimental to the environment, the three agencies that oversee GM crops, the FDA, USDA, and EDA, have ruled that these crops do not pose any real threat. Since the beginning of the GM crop in 1996, there have been 2,497 approvals of the safety of GMOs in the environment and 1,129 of these approvals have been for the food safety of the products (Monsanto). This further disproves the claim that GMOs are unsafe for humans and the environment and reassures that there is no risk involved in either the consumption or the planting of GM

GMOs have been around since the 1980's. GMOs, or genetically modified organisms combine different DNAs from different sources into one. The question whether to have GMOs has been a controversial topic, but I believe that the benefits outweigh the costs. Of the stronger points for GMOs is that they include a lot of nutrition. By combining several DNAs the nutrition levels of the product are drastically increased. On the other hand, the most common argument against GMOs is that they are inorganic and artificial. Many people are against eating products that have been genetically altered. They prefer to eat the natural product and obtain less nutrients than eat something that has been genetically modified. I also believe that GMOs are more beneficial than the normal product because of how frequently they have been used. It is fairly rare to see in a grocery store a section designated for organic food only, thus this is to show that GMOs are more widely common. GMOs are said to have alleged effects on many people, but they solution regarding this population is to simply not obtain the product; it isn't a reason to stop the production of

GMO's are simply an addition to the long list of alterations made to the balance of nature. At its surface, GMO's seem to represent food as it's meant to look ripe, shiny, and never corrupted by pests, and these claims aren't wrong. GMO's bring a variety of benefits to the table. They increase resistance to cold, protect from select pests, and can even be used to transfer vital nutrients to other organisms. Various regions, such as Eastern Asia, have greatly benefitted from the use of GMO's, as prominent food, such as rice, lack nutrients necessary for growth and survival. GMO's have also helped farmers grow crops with more ease and less expense. However, these GMO's pack a price. Genes can be transferred to unintended targets, and pests who grow resistant to these GMO's may breed, causing an epidemic. Moreover, scientists believe that the

“In a sweeping 400-page report, the country’s top scientific group found there was not evidence to support claims that genetically modified organisms are dangerous for either the environment or human health” (Heikkinen, 2016). Even Europe, a country that does not use this technology has proven that GMOs are a safe food source. “There is a scientific consensus, even in Europe, that the GMO foods and crops currently on the market have brought no documented new risks either to human health or to the environment” (Paarlberg, 2010). The biggest argument against GMOs would be that they are not safe to humans or the environment, but there has not yet been any documented evidence that approved GMOs have brought on new risks either to humans, animals or the environment (Paarlberg, 2010). Along with being scientifically proven numerous times to be a safe food source, there is also no confirmation that GMOs pose any risk to humans, animals, or the environment. “The central issue with GM crops is that because there are no concrete adverse effects for people to quantify, they can only focus on theoretical and largely unquantifiable ones” (Buiatti, Christou, & Pastore, 2013). Hundreds of experts have all concluded that GMOs have not presented any new risks to humans. “The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) in Paris organized a conference with 400 expert

the rise in advanced technology, Genetically Modified Foods were engineered and created. Not only were they new in the sense that it provided an easier source of growing, but it also brought ,with it, a new controversy across the world. Genetically Modified Foods (GMOs) are created by moving a gene from one animal to another. An example of this would be moving the gene of an Icefish to a tomato to give the tomato a longer shelf life. GMOs were intended to help increase food production and help foods last longer however, GMOs have become very controversial because of their potential health and environmental effects. GMOs could have detrimental effects on the population and on the Earth.

Although no studies can prove that GMOs are harmful to humans, many can prove the dangers of using pesticides with crops. Justin Tolley, a crop advisor for Crop Production Services, isn’t afraid of consuming GMOs in foods because they don’t contain the harsh chemicals that can harm humans. Pesticides and herbicides contain chemicals that are poisonous to the human body, as well as the environment and its wildlife. By switching from foods treated with pesticides to GMOs, the chemical intake would decrease dramatically. Along with the lack of chemicals, genetically modified foods can have increased amounts of nutrients and minerals in comparison to standard foods. Scientists have created a grain to aid the issue of A vitamin deficiencies in poorer countries (Chien). Modified foods can also replace supplement pills; the dosage would also be controlled because it would be based on how much food one ate instead of the premeasured dosage of supplements. Risks for allergies could also be eliminated using GMOs. “Scientists have identified a new gene in peanuts that codes for a protein with no apparent allergic effects” (Agricultural Biotechnology Council). Peanut and nut allergies are a very common issue and even pose the risk of death for some people. Getting rid of gene codes that trigger allergies for nuts and other foods would reduce health and possible death risks in humans; overall the health of all humans could

Others think that GMO’s are not the answer to ending world hunger. According to a study in Melbourne, Australia by John Brumby, “ There is irrefutable evidence that GM foods are unsafe to eat. Working with more than 30 scientists worldwide, I documented 65 health risks of GM foods. There are thousands of toxic or allergic-type reactions in humans, thousands of sick, sterile and dead livestock, and damage to virtually every organ and system studied in laboratory animals” (Eating GM foods is a Health risk). He talks about how GMOs are somewhat not safe for human consumption. John Brumby also states in his work that, “GM corn and cotton have genes inserted that produce a pesticide called Bt. If the gene transferred from corn snacks, for example, it could turn our intestinal flora into living pesticide factories. Farmers on three continents link Bt corn varieties with sterility in pigs and cows, or deaths among cows, horses, water buffaloes and chickens” (Eating GM foods is a Health risk). This also means that GMOs are infectious to crops, and that it can have a very negative effect on our bodies, that we might not know

As GMOs are a fairly new invention in the scope of things and we have no real idea of the long term health damage being caused we need to be vigilant. Many effects from GMOs are just now being realized, bees and other beneficial insects are dying at alarming rates because of exposure to GMO pollen.A study showed a clear link between GMO plants and the use of Round-up which in turn was shown to cause bees kidneys to fail (Amos). Yet in another rats were shown to develop tumors at very high rates and earlier than they would naturally when fed on GMO maize (Séralini).Though the study was retracted the researchers said it was only at the insistence of Monsanto and they stand by their findings (de Vendômois JS).We know that Genetically Modified Organisms are bad for the environment, for many reasons. For instance when organisms are injected with the DNA of another organism it reduces biodiversity, and thus we run the risk of extinction of the original plant organism.Also seeds from GMO crops like Monsanto’s canola mix with weeds which then become herbicide tolerant, and can smother out good crops.

The debate on genetically modified organisms is a big topic and heated on either side. Genetically modified organisms should not be hated on, instead supported by citizens because they are the answer to the future of solving world hunger. GMO’s increase the yield of crops grown and, at the same time, safe for human consumption. With the world population growing at the rate it is today, GMO’s are essential when talking about the future of the world and solving the threat of world hunger but, scientists and farmers still need to be cautious of the unknowns that arise with GMO’s. What is their long term effects on the earth and what people are using them for?

A commonly discussed topic in the science community is the debate about GMOs and their application in our society. Genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, are plants or animals modified with the process of genetic engineering. A process in which genes are taken from one species and artificially placed in another to create organisms with desirable traits. I you see a label on food products saying “GMO” then that means it was created with genetic modification. Although it is very uncertain, many people believe that eating GMOs can cause long-term illnesses, such as cancer. GMOs can affect countries and economies in many ways. For example, GM seeds can be very expensive, so if a country buys a lot, then they could lose money of the seeds have no effect. GMOs allow farmers to grow crops in low quality soil, which provides lifelines for farmers working with poor soil. GMOs can also lower the

I believe that GMOs will harm human life over time. GMOs, or genetically modified organism, have many negative effects on people such as creating food allergies. In GMOs specific traits are transmitted from different species to another specie. GMOs pass traits on, such as different allergies, which can allow the spread of deadly traits among a population of humans. GMOs are produced with chemicals which can alter many different genes in a humans body. The chemicals found in GMOs turn certain alleles on due to a variation of genes. The alteration of alleles and genes can possibly create many different food allergies. Food allergies can be created by chemicals used in production of GMOs or by passing them on from other organisms during the

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) defines certified organic products as “ those which have been produced, stored, processed, handled and marketed in accordance with precise technical specifications (standards) and certified as "organic" by a certification body” (FAO, 1999). Here, this is a common definition oriented by the production process of the “organic” product and the label of verification of a certification body as opposed to and verification of product quality (Bourn and Prescott, 2002; Sundrum, 2001; IFOAM, 1996).