The Four Ethical Lenses and The 4+1 Decision Process

The Baird Decision Model comprises five cumulative steps by being: attentive, intelligent, reasonable, responsible, and awareness (Ethics Game, n.d). Moreover, the design behind the decision model is to use ethics to assess complex situations, where personal values compete to find the appropriate solution (Ethics Game, n.d). However, four ethical views assist in ethical decision-making: rights and responsibility lens, results lens, relationship lens, and the reputation lens (Ethics Game, n.d).

Making sound ethical decisions require an intentional process that utilizes thoughtful reflection, supervision/consultation, and action. Many ethical decision making models exist and the seven-step model introduced by Forester-Miller and Davis (1996) is a succinct amalgamation of these earlier models. The model by Forester-Miller and Davis (1996) follows seven progressive steps: (a) identify the problem, (b) apply the ACA Code of Ethics (2014), (c) determine the nature and dimensions of the dilemma, (d) generate potential courses of action, (e) consider the potential consequences of all options and determine a course of action, (f) evaluate the selected course of action, and (g) implement the course of action.

The issue of ethical decision making has become more important in recent years for a variety of reasons. An understanding of ethical decision making in organizations is more significant to the development of organizational science. Managers engage in decision-making behavior affecting the lives and well-being of others. The individual responds to an ethical dilemma with cognitions determined by his or her cognitive moral development stage.

Decision making considers all aspects of an organization. At CVS, ethics is most vital in the decision making process and are mirrored in the decisions made. The organization’s ethical framework is based on its mission statement, which is the guiding principle and filter for decision making (CVS,2010). This mission statement, includes the goal of improving the quality of human

The Ethical Theory that Could be Used to Guide Ethical Decision Making for the Staff

Everyday individuals are faced with issues associated with ethical dilemmas. Ethical dilemmas involve an individual’s behavior toward a moral standard, which may have been established from previous generations and passed along. In upholding the standards taught individual may be forced to take a particular action involving a decision when a behavior is considered non-ethical is when an ethical dilemma occurs. It can become difficult at times in making the correct decisions or solutions to the situation, which is why a code of ethics is established in the workplace. The code of ethics in the

Management constitute amongst major components of a company, organization or a business. As such, management oversees employees interactions with their supervisors and also control of people within a particular organization. Also, it includes critical and ethical decision-making process so as to address various ethical dilemmas experienced by employees while undertaking their respective assigned duties within the company. Ethical dilemmas are hereby to stay as issues usually arise now and then and place a variety of options that bear different repercussions. Therefore, it calls for ethical and critical decision-making skills so as to make the most appropriate option that bears more benefits in comparison to other options presented. While making ethical decisions, it 's substantially important to play heed to a certain ethical decision-making theory. This would enable an individual making the decision to ripe best possible consequences rather than living to regret. Moreover, ethical decision making is typically important in business as making a wrong decision may result not only in huge losses but also poor relationship amongst colleagues and miserable life for employee(s) working in a particular company or business in question.

In today's business and personal world, ethical decisions are made on a daily basis. Most of these decisions are based on company ground rules. The others are based on personal ground rules. All decisions can have a number of ground rules that help us determine whether our decision is ethical or unethical. Each decision whether it is based on company or personal ground rules will have its own set of implications. In the following paragraphs I will discuss the impacts of ethics on decision-making, discuss the elements of an ethically defensible decision, define what the ground rules are; what they could be and what they should be, discuss

Ethical decision-making is a process where one decides on a course of action based on ethical and professional principles. The ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, justice and nonmaleficence are often brought into consideration in ethical dilemmas. Healthcare professionals often use these ethical principles as a premise to make morally sound judgements on care provision. Ethical dilemmas surface when these principles conflict with one another. The correct course of action is not clearly defined and the decisions made may be challenged. Decisions made on moral grounds are often intrinsically complex and intricate.

I choice to use the Seven Step Model of a Decision-Making Model for Resolving Ethical Issues in order to define what is ethical in this case study.

As we have to write an annotated bibliography on the topic “Ethics in management decision”, I along with my other group members (Poonam and Hilda) arranged a successful group meeting for week 5. On this meeting, we discussed about the topic that we have selected. We have decided to have a meeting at least once a week at the university library group discussion room and also decided to communicate with each other regularly by our cellular phone and with

It is when confronted with such dilemmas that defining the specific ethical perspectives, principles, and overall framework from which a decision is being made becomes important. Before one can make a logical and objective ethical decision, there needs to be a conscious awareness of why and how this ethical decision is going to be made, and it is here that very significant differences and departures in ethical thinking and ethical outcomes come about. Comparing such systems yields a great deal of insight and can create uncertainty, at first, however a thorough inspection shows that one ethical system is clearly above the rest. If there is to be any

(Angelo Kinicki, 2015) There are four approaches to deciding ethical dilemmas; utilitarian approach is guided by what will result in the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The individual approach is guided by what will result in the individual’s best long term interests. The moral-right approach is guided by respect for the fundamental rights of human beings. Last the justice approach is guided by respect for impartial standards of fairness and equity. These approaches can be used by companies. They can help and provide guidelines for companies when faced with ethical dilemmas, this provides an alternative method.

Within an organization, leaders are faced with ethical decisions on a continuous basis. In most cases it is not a case of right or wrong, but a matter of how the decision made will affect the company, employees, and customers. The decision of any leaders should be based on the overall good of the organization. At

Each individual faces a situation in professional or personal life, where they are required to make an ethical decision. This type of decision making requires a person to make a personal judgment about a matter that affects lives of other people. For Example, to hire or fire a person based on race, ethnicity, or religion would be an unethical decision. In this paper will be discussed the ethical values of Shelina Virani, how her values align with the values of Kudler Fine Foods, and how these values would effect her performance as a manager at Kudler Fine Food.