preview

The Four Factor Theories Created By Finkelhor And Araji

Decent Essays

Many theories have come about to try to help explain pedophilia. There is a four factor theory that was created by Finkelhor and Araji. The four factors they contribute to why individuals are attracted to children and do what they do are emotional congruence, sexual arousal to children, blockage, and disinhibition. Emotional congruence helps to explain the “idea of a fit between the adult’s emotional needs and the child’s characteristics” (Finkelhor & Araji, 1986, p. 148). The theories that fall under this category each explain or add to the definition. Hammer and Glueck (1957) and Groth and Burgess (1979) believed pedophiles experience themselves as children and have childish needs (as cited in Finkelhor & Araji, 1986, p. 148). This theory …show more content…

Sexual norms being repressed can lead to this disorder acting as a form of blockage. Adults who go through such a situation may make them “feel guilty or conflicted about engaging in adult sexual relationships” (Finkelhor & Araji, 1986). There is also the norm about masturbation being inappropriate for adults. When these norms are seen as inappropriate, individuals act out to release pressure. This ends up being at children. Many people with this disorder, as we have seen previously, are antisocial. Their relationships are not well or nonexistent. The only people they can take advantage of are children who are small and …show more content…

In the criminal justice system, it is hardly looked at as a disordered. People pass around the term pedophile as if it is just a label for those who commit sexual acts with children, not a disorder. The problem with this and the system is that it works more on empathy for the victim than on disorders. The criminal justice system is supposed to be about treatment and rehabilitation with punishment to protect society. What we have been seeing lately is an emphasis on retribution which buts the victim and their feelings at the forefront. When this began, sex offenders were given very long sentences with the opportunity for early release (Zonana, 1997). In 1990, the first sexual predator statutes were passed. These statutes “permitted state officials, under civil law, to commit offenders who were considered dangerous if, at the end of their sentence, they met the criteria of a “sexual predator” (Zonana, 1997). The problem with this was that they had to prove that there was some mental abnormality which may cause an offender to recidivate. The standard for this was so general that any abnormality could be used to keep individuals locked away, such as antisocial personality traits. One would think that detaining an individual in prison for much longer than there term would be illegal, but in a Supreme Court ruling, the court stated that it does not

Get Access