The Four Stage Of The Authentic Leadership Model

Responsible behavior is defined by making good decisions and caring for others, and responsive behavior is defined as how one reacts easily or readily. Behavior that reflects responsibility is often mistaken for something established by nature, but responsible and responsive behavior is influenced from other people and the lifestyle one has lived. Responsible behavior can be caused by the environment in which one is raised in, who they are based on personal experiences or an answer to a need in society.

Connecting education with good experiences will allow a child to feel secure at school and realise their full potential.

The two theories that I chose to do my self-assessment by are the authentic leadership theory and the servant leadership theory. The authentic leadership theory was chosen due to my desire to stay true to who I am and what I stand for. However, the servant leadership theory was chosen because of my desire to meet the needs of others while doing what I can to help others succeed as well as meet their set goals. Being a servant while being authentic are the traits I want in my style of leadership and are assessed throughout this paper along with my strengths and weaknesses in the area of leadership.

A schema is the basic building block of intelligent behaviour, a form of organizing information that a person uses to interpret the things he or she sees, hears, smell, and touches (Singer & Revenson, 1997). A schema can be thought of as a unit of knowledge, relating to one aspect of the world including objects, actions, and abstract (theoretical) concepts. We use schemas to understand and to respond to situations. We store them and apply them when needed.

Three weaknesses of authentic leadership are: lack of trust demonstrated from top to bottom and vice versa, a lack of development due to the infancy of this theory and the pursuit with passion can lead to a blind pursuit. Trust must be given in order to receive it, if managers are not being fully authentic with their employees, the trust and level of commitment expected will never be reciprocated. Although John usually displays this trust to his team, he is only human and at times, as with any other manager or person, people are not trustworthy. For example for years, Big Hospital has preached that everyone is a family, yet, due to certain circumstances, there had to be a lot of layoffs, and whether granted or not, this is looked as being deceitful or not being honest with your employees. The second weakness of authentic leadership can be related to its infancy and its lack of leadership development. Fusco, T. (2016, p.119) argues that the next challenging frontier is to establish genuine leadership development. Often times, leadership seems to simply fit someone’s personality, however, leaders must continue to read and develop oneself to become a better leader, either through experiences or personal training. Big Hospital provides continued training for all its employees, and although some may take it more than others, employees are often encouraged to take training classes. Lastly, the third weakness of this theory is that of a “blind pursuit” or following an idea with

Abstract: There are numerous definitions of leadership, all of which contain elements related to people (the leader and the follower(s)), communicating in person or by the written word, actions (organizing, directing, coaching, and/or motivating), and for a purpose (meeting a goal(s) or accomplishing a task(s)) (ADP 6-22) (Fisher 2015) (Bolden 2013) (Hogan 2005). Additionally, everything done occurs within a given context. Effective leaders are poised, proficient, pertinent, and practical in the application of the art of leadership. This means leaders are ready to engage the group with effective methods and

Reacting and responding are both similar and yet quite different. When a person reacts, it is normally in a negative way; they usually are angry. Responding is quite different actually; it is the complete opposite of reacting. When a person responds to something, it is usually done in a positive way; they usually are calm and gentle in the way they express their opinions.

In brief, authentic leadership is defined as a “leadership that emphasizes building the leader 's legitimacy through honest relationships with followers which value their input and are built on an ethical foundation” (Authentic Leadership, n.d.). As leaders, they create close, trusting bonds with their followers through their transparency and their drive to serve their followers (Northouse, 2016). Practical approaches to authentic leadership are linked to a set of five initial characteristics that individuals need to possess. These include motivation, well developed values, strong relational connections, self-control and passion (Northouse,

When it comes to the differences between reactive and proactive policing there is a big difference. Reactive policing only occurs after a crime has been committed. However, proactive occurs before or prior to a crime happening. Therefore, once a crime has happened the police are called out to investigated the crime as well as take any statements that need to be taken which is reactive policing. On the other hand, with proactive policing the police act on their own initiative in order to make sure that they can develop information about crimes as well as strategies to suppress these crimes. Therefore, proactive policing has become the most common used policing now because they have found that it works best because the police are always out looking

The results of the self-assessments are not consistent. According to the Authentic Leadership Self-Assessment, I rated low on self-awareness. This is due to my inability to recognize my strengths and weaknesses. I did, however, rate high on internalized moral perspective, balanced processing, and relational transparency. Next, the LMX 7 Questionnaire, I rated high. This questionnaire was given to my supervisor and one of my followers. The results of my Path-Goal Leadership Questionnaire, I rated average in all leadership styles. I rated highest in the directive style. The Skills Inventory Assessment resulted in a high score in technical and human skills, and moderate in conceptual skills. Having a moderate score in conceptual skills results in my inability to see the goals of the organization. I should familiarize myself with the organizations aims and objectives and align my goals with theirs. Furthermore, the Leadership Trait Questionnaire scores averaged between a 3 and 4, the highest scores being in dependability and friendly.

The twelve stages each acquire a new skill as the individual develops gradually throughout their

table tennis, when playing a game, a player may be able to hit on one

Theoretical framework for proactive approach is positive for mitigation and preparedness but becomes negative by losing the response and

Employees with this disposition tend to perceive opportunities for positive changes in the workplace and then actively work to bring about these changes (Bateman & Crant, 1993; Grant & Ashford, 2008). Proactive employees demonstrate initiation, perceive their work roles more broadly, take active steps to get work done, initiate changes, follow through until completion, and subsequently perform well at work; hence, proactive personality has been linked to a number of positive work outcomes (see Crant & Bateman, 2000; Crant, 1995; Seibert et al., 1999; Thompson, 2005), which makes proactive employees desirable to their organizations. Crant (1995) noted that proactive personality is a potentially useful tool for selection due to its strong relationship with job performance, making it a valid

The differences between reactive and proactive approaches to security vary greatly. In simple words, a reactive approach is usually referring to a responsive action done after something has happened. Whereas, a proactive approach is taking all the necessary actions in prior, in order to prevent something from happening. An example of proactive approach related to security would be the design of Wah Fu public housing estate located next to Waterfall Bay, Pok Fu Lam in Hong Kong’s Southern District. The reason why this old housing estate fits the example of proactive approach is mainly due to the design and architect of the estate. Each block has a big square gap in the middle; this enables neighbors to see across their apartments and report any suspicious activity or person. However, due to the limited supply of land in Hong Kong, buildings with such designs have seized to exist.