The Fulfillment Theory Of Job Satisfaction

This theory only offers simple overview, as first step of the job satisfaction’s analysis. However, deeper analysis is required when the managers want a better understanding.

Job satisfaction can be defined as psychological state of how an individual feels towards work, in other words, it is people‟s feelings and attitudes about variety of intrinsic and extrinsic elements towards jobs and the organizations they perform their jobs in. The elements of job satisfaction are related to pay, promotion, benefits, work nature, supervision, and relationship with colleagues. Employees‟ satisfaction is considered as all-around module of an organization‟s human resource strategies. According to Simatwa (2011) Job satisfaction means a function which is positively related to the degree to which one‟s personal needs are fulfilled in the job situation. Kuria (2011) argues that employees are the most satisfied and highly productive when their job offers them security from economic strain, recognition of their effort clean policy of grievances, opportunity to contribute ideas and suggestions, participation in decision making and managing the

The term work fulfillment figures noticeably in any discourses on administration of human assets. Work fulfillment alludes to an individual's inclination of fulfillment at work, which goes about as an inspiration to work. It is not the self- fulfillment, bliss or self- happiness yet the fulfillment at work. Work fulfillment has numerous measurements. Normally noted aspects are fulfillment with the work itself, wages, and distinguishment, compatibility with managers and collaborators, and chance for headway.

According to Herzberg, individuals are not satisfied with lower-order needs at work, for example, those associated with minimum salary levels or safe and pleasant working conditions. Theses individuals look for the gratification of higher-level psychological needs such as achievement, recognition, responsibility, advancement, and the nature of the work itself. Motivation-hygiene theory, based on the presence of one set of job characteristics or incentives lead to worker satisfaction at work, while another and separate set of job characteristics lead to dissatisfaction at work. Moreover he found that job characteristics related to what an individual does is the nature of the work he performs, having the capacity to gratify such needs such as achievement, competency, status, personal worth, and self-realization, leading to satisfaction. However, the absence of such gratifying job characteristics does not lead to dissatisfaction. Instead, dissatisfaction results from unfavorable assessments of such job-related factors as company

Intrinsic factors, such as achievement, recognition, the work itself, responsibility, advancement, and growth seem to be related to job satisfaction. When respondents questioned felt good about their work, they tended to attribute those factors to themselves. On the other hand, when they were dissatisfied, they tended to cite extrinsic factors such as company policy, administration and supervision. Herzberg deduced from these experiments that the opposite of satisfaction is not dissatisfaction, as was believed. He found that removing dissatisfying characteristics from a job does not necessarily make the job satisfying. He thus proposed a dual continuum, where the opposite of satisfaction would be no satisfaction and the opposite of dissatisfaction would be no dissatisfaction (Robbins,1993) According to Herzberg’s two-factor theory of motivation, organizations cannot begin to motivate employees until that which dissatisfies them has been removed. Hygiene Factors such as salary, working conditions and supervision are not motivators even when they are being met. Other types of hygiene factors include, company policy, poor interpersonal relations and job security. The meeting of lower-level needs of employees is not motivating, but can have a de motivating impact if not met. True motivation only kicks in when an employee’s higher-level needs are met (La Motta,

The Value Percept Theory argues that job satisfaction depends on whether a job supplies the things an individual value most. Overall satisfactions derive form combined levels of satisfaction from various elements of an individual’s job, whether it’s: pay, promotion, supervision, coworkers, or the work itself. Job satisfaction is based on cognitive and affective components, which is evaluated by what an individual thinks about the job, and how they feel. Cognition evaluation is based on experiences, weighing different aspects of a job; as affect is a reaction of the job, which can fluctuate based on moods and emotions. Level of dissatisfaction is measured by the difference between what one has and what one wants, and the level of importance of that facet to the individual. Statistics have proven, that supplying individuals with what they value, will increase the chance of better performance, which has a high correlation with an individual’s affective commitment with the organization.

Job satisfaction comes from the attitude that employees have towards their work. There is a close relationship between the degree of satisfaction and the motivation level of employees. Explaining that if there is a lack of motivation in the workplace, it is likely due to a lack

Job satisfaction has a direct correlation to employee engagement and perceived organizational support. Businesses, firms, and agencies would do well to hire on the basis of an applicant’s core self-evaluation. As such, recruits or applicants with positive core self-evaluation are more likely to be engaged and begin the cycle of job satisfaction. That is, engaged employees more readily complete the tasks and goals of the organization and are therefore supported by the organization. As the cycle moves, output / production increase and one’s satisfaction grows.

This theory argues that job satisfaction hinge on if the employee perceives that their job conveys the extent that he/she values. Value-percept theory also suggests that people evaluate job satisfaction according to specific “facets” (Locke, 1964) of the job relating to pay, promotion, colleague and managers, and work itself, described as follows: Pay Satisfaction, refers to employees’ feelings about their pay; Promotion Satisfaction, refers to employees’ feelings about the company’s promotion policies and their execution, including fairness, occurrence, etc.; Supervision Satisfaction, reflects employees’ feelings and overall and professional evaluation about their boss; Coworker Satisfaction, refers to employees’ feelings and professional/relational evaluation about their fellow employees, Satisfaction with the Work Itself, reflects employees’ feelings about the nature and the characteristics of their actual work tasks (Smith, Kendall, and Hulin, 1969) The value percept theory could be explained by this following equation (Colquitt et al, 2009): Dissatisfaction = (Vwant –

Through-out this essay the notion of satisfied employees being more productive will be broken down and examined, taking into consideration research and theories, to determine if there is any correlation between the two elements, and if so, to what extent. Locke (1976) defines “job satisfaction as pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experience… a perception of how well their job provides those things that are viewed as important.” The feeling of satisfaction is an attitude, “a psychological tendency that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity with some degree of favour or disfavour” (Eagly and Chaiken, 1993) favour being the satisfaction the employee feels. “While in its purest

In the classic block buster movie from 1956, the legendary actor Charlton Heston playing the role of Moses’ declared to Pharaoh “Let my people go” (Exodus 5:1, New International Version). This is a reenactment of the Old Testament account from the Book of Exodus, where Moses is referring the Jewish people that are being used as slave labor by the Egyptians to build the pyramids. Archeologists and historians estimate the story of Exodus originated between 1550 and 1000 BC. From a historic perspective, the story depicted from Exodus describes that of mass worker job dissatisfaction. Moses’ the leader of Jewish people may have been the first leaders in the worker rights movement.

According to Fredric Herzberg, “achievement, recognition, work itself, responsibility, and advancement” are all job satisfiers (Starling, 2011, p. 357). Yet, when dissatisfiers are not eliminated first, it may impede job satisfaction. Dissatisfiers are “company policy and administration, supervision, salary, interpersonal relations, and working conditions” (Starling, 2011, p. 357). Relating this to the case study, we may find that several dissatisfiers are present and unfortunately, because of financial difficulties, it will take time to eliminate them. However, the goal would be to eliminate dissatisfaction to the least extent possible. The first dissatisfier is the change in company policy that will take place due to the circumstances. This change most likely will

Job satisfaction is a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one’s job or job experiences. It has been treated both as a general attitude and satisfaction with five specific dimensions of the job: pay, the work itself, promotion opportunities, supervision, and coworkers. Challenging work, valued rewards, opportunities for advancement, competent supervision, and supportive coworkers are dimensions of the job that can lead to satisfaction (Nelson & Quick, 2013, pg.

Managers today are finding it harder to ignore the job satisfaction issue, especially at a time when the demand of meaningful work is increasing. There are two main reasons why managers are concerned with job satisfaction. One of the reasons is that managers have a moral responsibility to do what they can to provide employees with a satisfying work environment (Ramayah, Jantan, & Tadisnia, 2001). Another reason is that managers believe that the behavior of satisfied workers will make positive contributions to the organization (Ramayah, Jantan, & Tadisnia, 2001).

Job satisfaction can be known to some people as an important element in their lives. If an individual is unhappy with their occupation it may affect other parts of their life. Job satisfaction can be seen in what one wants in a job as to what one has in their current job.