The Future Of Australia 's Renewable Energy Industry Through Regulation And Initiatives

The stage for a deeper integration of Renewable Energies in the UK was set by a number of these policies which has evolved over the years. These policies however were not delivering maximum efficiency when compared to other policies in other European countries. For instance, the inefficiency of some of the policy mechanisms when compared to those obtainable in Germany had been severally argued. The Energy White Paper 2003 was largely a response to the future of the UK Energy industry drawing from the failures of these past policy implementations.

In this final assignment for Environmental Policy, Regulation, and Law, I will discuss the Energy Policy Act. This discussion will be geared toward the current usage of renewable energy with reference to the incentives created in the Energy Policy Act. The introduction into this topic will include a brief synopsis of the act’s history. Following the history of the Energy Policy Act, there will be a discussion and argument for the act and its present incentives for the use of renewable energy sources. In conclusion, the expected future of the Energy Policy Act and the closing argument for its regulation will be covered.

Coal is currently one of the biggest issues facing Australia as it producing too much fossil fuel. As stated by Todd woody, Wind turbines are sourcing 30 percent of Australia’s energy production, and today is one leading renewable energy projects the country it self has to offer, this statement I believe is overly correct and is why I believe that wind turbines are a lot more environmentally friendly than coal burning. Current efforts to minimize global warming are based on the expectation that the people across the globe will agree to and toward a sustainable and eco friendly future. The aim is to improve the balance between coal emissions and fossil fuels. As you may already know the government is working on a program called RET

Good morning everyone. Australia often claims that it is doing its best to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions, but energy analysts are suggesting otherwise. Recently it has been reported that unless investments in renewable energy triple, it is impossible for the government to fulfil its promise of the 2020 renewable energy target. Today I am here to argue that Australia has to divert its funding for non-renewable energy to investments in alternative energy sources. Not only will this bring us closer to reaching the renewable energy target, or RET, Australia is in an advantageous position to improve its job market and economy through this change.

In discussions of climate change, one of the controversial issues has been supporting President Barack Obama. His video announcement in the East Room of the White House, President Obama announces the “Clean Power Plan --- our biggest step yet in the fight against climate change” argues that, “Since the President took office, the administration has made the largest investment in clean energy in American History.” The United States has cut more carbon pollution than any other nations since 2008, and solar power has grown 20 times while generating three times more electricity. Obama has created access to solar energy for low and moderate-income households. On the other hand, Obama’s administration

I believed the government should encourage environmental protectionism, including offering incentives for renewable energy, and advancing a cultural shift towards a more eco-friendly mindset. In theory, if the government relied less on resources like fossil fuels, and encouraged investment in offshore wind farms, the world would be a better place. However, my debate coach always reminds me, every solution holds a consequence. My solution to coal generated electricity was offshore wind farms. Undoubtedly, the wind turbines could generate electricity, reduce global warming, and produce jobs. It was a marvelous, one-sided plan, that missed the other side of the debate. The nuances I later discovered affected my precious wind farm idea. For example, although humans may profit from offshore wind farms, there is a great chance of damaging marine life and ocean biodiversity. Ironically, in an effort to improve the environment, there is a chance that the attempt could devastate it. Although I begrudgingly acknowledged the harms, this discourse was essential to develop my understanding of the issue. Subsequently, I carried on the determination to discuss the flipside in order to expand my knowledge.

Although the United States has come a long way in the field of Renewable Energy, there are still major roadblocks in the way of a national shift to clean energy. Renewable energy made up only 12% of US energy production in 2016, while The three major fossil fuels—petroleum, natural gas, and coal—accounted for 78%, showing there is still a long way to go (eia.gov). This has been a particularly arduous year for environmentalist and renewable energy companies alike as there have been major political strides against clean energy. Bills, Executive Orders, and new laws have slowed the progress that Renewable Energy has been making in recent years.

Over all in Australia, there exists an extensive difference in the price of electrical energy, as the data shows that over 80% is output of black and brown coal which add pressure of the supply, once they experience such cost of producing these energy, market distortions come across other renewable alternatives in the future energy development ( Dopita &Williamson 2010, pp.11-13).

Australia has one of the world 's best and greatest sunlight based vitality assets, yet today short of what 1% of our power is created from this clean vitality source. Also regardless of 10 years of government renewable vitality targets we at present create just around 7% of our power from renewable vitality sources.

The development of industrialisation and advanced technology has played an important role in increasing energy consumption in the world. This increasing use of energy pattern has also brought a number of both environmental and human health problems such as greenhouse emissions. Despite this fact, most of the world’s energy is produced using fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and gas. For example, in 2008, Australian energy production was 302.13 million tonnes of equivalent oils (Mtoe) while the consumption of energy was 240.40 terawatt hours (TWh) and these amounts of energy consumption and production caused 397.54 million tonnes of carbon dioxide (Mt CO2) emissions to the world’s atmosphere (Drachman & Richard, 2010, p. 48). In

SEIA Issues & Policies. (2013, November 3). Retrieved November 8, 2013, from Solar Energy Industries Association: http://www.seia.org/policy/finance-tax

Environmental Considerations: The success or failure of clean energy for Australia is wholly dependent on the public’s consideration of environmental damage. There has been no shortage of debate from proponents of Environmental concerns and others who do not believe there is any problems or concerns facing our environmental future. Furthermore the environmental consideration of the public often dictates the policy direction and level of government support allocated to the proposition of clean energy.

For long period of time, Australia has did not have long term climate policy. Rather there have been toxic debate, bonfire issues and different state policies and not investment in this

Australia, much like the rest of the Western World, is becoming or has became a deregulated electricity sector. For our purposes, why a country deregulates can vary. As started in my previous essay, most of Australia’s privatization or deregulation of the utilities including electricity came down to two factors, one being money and following patterns of the other western countries who also have deregulated their electricity sectors and other utilities. However discussing only about deregulation and alternative energy portfolio standards is what we are focusing on.

In today’s modern society our needs and demands are infinite and fulfilling them can become a daunting task for any developing country or nation. The Australian Federal Government is confronted with these endless demands daily and must make decisions that are both advantageous towards the Australian public and satisfies the rudimentary requirements and necessities of the nation. Energy is a primary need that the Australian public requires daily and the procedures of generating the immense amounts of electricity required for powering every day necessities is currently being produced by the usage of fossil fuels, which has been validated to be an inefficient method of producing energy. Nuclear energy offers a resolution and