The Future Of Managed Health Care Delivery System Accountable Care Organization

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has created new forms of care organizations in order to provide better healthcare to Medicare and Medicaid patients at a greater value. The two types of organizations that this paper will focus on are Accountable Care Organizations (ACO’s) and Coordinated Care Organizations (CCO’s). There has been much information gathered regarding the similarities and differences between these organizations. This research has been conducted to better understand the way that ACO’s and CCO’s effect the hospitals, physicians, insurance providers, and patients involved in their implementation.

Healthcare is often driven by consumers and insurance companies; there is strong pushes for insurance companies to start paying better through Patient Care Medical Homes (PCMH) or Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) rather than paying at a per-visit basis (Hamlin, 2015). With PCMH or ACOs payment is made on a continuum of care, encouraging the provider to be involved in all aspects affecting health of the patient (Derksen, & Whelan,

The Accountable Care Organization (ACO) are groups of doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers, who come together voluntarily to give coordinated high-quality care to their Medicare patients (McCarty, B., 2016). For example, Medicare Shared Savings Program was created by The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services to monitor and establish that all ACO’s are meeting the quality performance benchmarks and reduce Medicare spending by certain percentages (H., 2017). The growth of ACO’s from 2011 to 2016 is astonishing, in 2011 there was 64 ACO’s and by 2016 they have risen to 838 in the U.S. (H., 2017).

The Affordable Care Act created a new approach to care which is called the Accountable Care Organization. ACO is a system of doctors and hospitals that share a financial and medical responsibilities. If the ACO is successful in meeting quality and cost savings targets, these organizations qualify for financial incentives or shared saving from Medicare programs. The goal of the ACO is to coordinate

The concept of an Affordable accountable cCare oOrganization (ACO) is still evolving. Generally, an ACO is a group of health care providers (including primary care physicians, specialists, and medical facilities) that work in partnership and are collectively accountable for the cost and quality of health care they deliver to a specific population of patients. At the heart of each patient's care is a primary care physician.

The accountable care organization I researched is called the Physician Organization of Michigan ACO (POM ACO). The POM ACO is a joint venture of the U-M Health System and physician groups around the state, with the aim of improving care for 81,000 Michiganders enrolled in traditional Medicare and slowing the growth of health care costs, according to the announcement by the U-M Health System (Daly, 2013). The group was launched on January 1, 2013 under the Medicare Shared Savings Program. 12 physician organizations from around Michigan came together to take part in a Medicare-sponsored program that strives to improve on the quality of care for traditional Medicare recipients, while also containing cost growth. In 2014, POM ACO expanded to include all the University of Michigan faculty physicians and thousands of other providers from the University of Michigan Health System. The POM ACO is now one of the largest accountable care organizations nationwide. More than 5,700 physicians and other providers are now involved in the POM ACO. Therefore, the POM ACO is organized as a physician-hospital organization. Hence, the patient has more flexibility in where and how their care is delivered. The patient can still use any doctor or hospital that accepts Medicare at any time.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) legislated in 2010, has changed the United States health care industry. In addition to universal healthcare, one of the principles of the ACA is the ideal of accountable care. Specifically, adopting an Accountable Care organization (ACO) for Medicare beneficiaries under the fee for service program. An ACO seeks to hold providers and health organizations accountable for not only the quality of health care they provide to a population, but also keeping the cost of care down (1). This is accomplished by offering financial incentives to the healthcare providers that cooperate in, circumventing avoidable tests and procedures. The ACO model, seeks to remove present obstacles to refining the value of care, including a payment system that rewards the volume and intensity of provided services instead of quality and cost performance and commonly held assumptions that more medical care is equivalent to higher quality care (2) .A successful ACO model, will have developed quality clinical work and continual improvement while effectively managing costs, however this is contingent upon its ability to encourage hospitals, physicians, post-acute care facilities, and other providers involved to form connections that aid in coordination of care delivery throughout different settings and groups, and evaluate data on costs and outcomes(3). This establishes the ACO will need to have organizational aptitude to institute an administrative body to manage patient care,

Accountable care organizations are growing. Accountable Care or Coordinated Care is putting consumers at the front at our evolving healthcare industry. Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) strive to improve outcomes and reduce costs with improved patient care coordination (Robinson, J. C., Schaffer, L. D. 2015). Coordinated Care is defined as the Right care, at the right time, with no duplication, and to prevent errors. The Affordable Care Act encourages health care organizations to improve quality of care and reduce spending. In 2013, there were 320 ACO’s and as of 2014 there are now 700. 2/3 of the population now live in an area that services ACO’s. One out of three hospitals have ACO plans (Perficient Inc. 2015).

The ACA included reductions in Medicare payments to plans and providers and introduced delivery system reforms that aims to improve efficiency and quality of patient care and reduce costs including accountable care organizations (ACOs), medical homes, bundled payments, and value-based purchasing initiatives”(Cubanski & Neuman, 2016, p. 2).

In this paper you are going to learn all about the Accountable Care Organization (ACO). Also, how does it pertain to the healthcare system? We will also be learning about the reimbursement rates for Medicare patients. Who makes up the Accountable Care Organization? We will also take a look into the Affordable Care Act and how the ACO is a part of that.

The state of California is active in the payment and delivery system reform. Of the 38 million residents in California, more than 15 million receive care through delegated arrangements with provider organizations in the commercial market, or through Medi-Cal (California’s Medicaid program), Healthy Families (California’s implementation of Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)), and Medicare Advantage plans (California Health Care Almanac, 2015). For the past decade, California’s reimbursement has been through shared risk pool, pay-for-performance quality incentive programs, and full and partial capitation (Pegany & Connolly, 2014). Pegany & Connolly (2014) state that under the Accountable Care Collaborative (ACO) programs, providers and hospitals don’t want assume additional risk, and reward does not outweigh the risk and investments costs. To increase the potential and impact of ACA reform, California policymakers should take advantage of the ACA delivery and payment reforms, and do so will require careful attention.

There are three core principles to any ACOs. First, provider-led organizations with primary maintenance and a strong base are liable communally and total per capita costs for quality with full continuum for the population of care for patients. Second, excellent improvements will have linked to also have complete costs reduced, and third, progressively and reliable sophisticated measurement performance to improve, support, and provide the savings of confidence are achieved with improvements of care, , McClellan M, McKethan AN, Lewis JL, Roski J, Fisher ES (2010).

The American health care system has been victim to an escalation in the prices of health care services juxtaposed with inefficiency in delivery of care services. There has even been cases where State spending on the actual health care increased dramatically in the United States and one of the key components of curbing this problem which has been prevalent over the mass media and has been a major discussion among physicians is the advent of Accountable Care Organizations. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) is structured with the goal of trying to improve health care delivery and aid in the reduction of the overall cost of services (Weissert & Weissert, 2012). If there is insufficient coordination of high quality care delivery in the health care industry, this will have a negative impact on patient safety and diminish affordable care for patients. Hence, the development of ACOs is envisioned to be the savior of medical practices and can improve the overall fabric of the American society (Bresnick, 2013). ACOs serves as one of the answers for curbing the problem of high costs, low quality care and possible segmented delivery and as much as it serve as the major determinant for improvement in patient satisfaction, there are minor

With the ability of performance level and quality reporting methods, Accountable care organizations should define population as every patient who comes under the provider network and at the same being highly accountable for the cost of care. Financial rewards depends on the cost and quality of procedures opted by the ACO in improving the population health. ACOs can play a vital role in population health as primary care physicians who are the basic building blocks of ACO play an important role in managing the patient’s care. Through the physician engagement with the patients at the primary care physician level can focus more on the preventive measures, educating the patients about the disease management, chronic medical illness at a community level. This patient-based population model along with ACO financial and clinical performance requirements will enable the organizations with networking in the group practice can identify and manage the individuals with costly and risky conditions in the provider network region. Overall, group practices within the ACOs can play an important role in monitoring the health status of the entire community population by taking

Becker’s Hospital Review offered three value-based alternative approaches to the controversial challenges to the current health system. Becker’s review discussed holding everyone who would naturally form the ACO to be financially accountable for keeping costs down but continue to be held to a standard to improve patient health (Becker’s Hospital Review, 2011). If the time is not right to implement the ACO, the pay-for-performance and its quality performance model can still be utilized; the bundled payments option and its episode of care option of paying for single use; and the medical home reimbursement tool that has already been proven to lower costs and improve satisfaction, are all models that can be used if the time is not right for the