The Future of Nuclear Power Essay

Citizens of countries where fossil fuels are being utilized are concerned at the possible chance of global warming. So many greenhouse gases emitted, ice burgs and caps are shifting or melting, that population is beginning to worry about what is going to happen to the environment in the future if this source is kept being used. With nuclear energy we don’t have to worry about the environmental changes. Nuclear energy has

The American people “found themselves beholding a new heaven and a new earth, to which they somewhat dazedly tried to adjust themselves (Boyer, 2000). America was entering the “Age of Nuclear Power”. The first full scale test of atomic energy was conducted in 1945. The application of this new technology was not used for the purpose of human advancement, but for the purpose of human destruction through the implosion of an atomic fission bomb exploded in a remote section of New Mexico (Groves, 1945). While this explosion was a test and had no direct human casualties, the purpose was for the future use during the Second World War against the Empire of Japan. The explosion was beyond expectations; the effects could be seen for over a hundred miles. The overwhelming consensus was that they had all witnessed and “been present for the birth of a new age, The Age of Atomic Energy” (Farrell, 1945). Those present felt they had witnessed something infinitely

Thirty-one years ago today, on April 26th 1986, “a sudden surge of power during a reactor systems test destroyed Unit 4 of the nuclear power station at Chernobyl” {1}. Nuclear energy can be unstable, but there has been a growing comeback of enthusiasm in nuclear energy as a renewable energy source. Before I continue talking about nuclear energy, let me provide you some background on it. It all started in Germany in 1895 when he started to experiment with cathode rays

In the following, the benefits and drawbacks of generating electricity with the use of nuclear energy will be discussed.

Nuclear power was the world’s fastest growing form of energy in the 1990’s. However, presently it is the second slowest growing worldwide. Considering that nuclear power accounts for eleven percent of the world’s energy supply, one must ask what happened [Nuclear Power]. Why is it that the growth of nuclear power has almost completely stalled? The simple answer is that after meltdowns such as Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, many people are afraid of nuclear power plants, which causes great opposition to the expansion of the industry. Unfortunately, most people are not well informed about nuclear energy; many do not take the time to view its positives and negatives.

In 2013, a study conducted by NASA found that nuclear energy has prevented around 1.8 million deaths; nuclear energy ranks last in death per energy unit generated per year. While nuclear waste is really toxic, it’s usually stored somewhere. The toxic byproducts of fossil fuels are pumped into the air we breathe everyday. So just by reducing the amount of fossil fuels burned, countless cases of cancer or lung disease and accidents in coal mines have been avoided. If we can choose between lots of dangerous stuff being put into a deep hole and lots and lots of dangerous stuff being pumped into the atmosphere, the former seems more logical. Nuclear energy feels way more dangerous though, single catastrophic events burn into our memory while coal and oil kill silently. Another reason why nuclear energy is a good idea, it reduces Co2. Nuclear energy is arguably way less harmful to the environment in terms of climate change than fossil fuels, our main source of energy. Since 1976 about 64 Giga Tonnes of greenhouse emissions have not been pumped out thanks to nuclear energy and by the mid twenty first century, that could amount to an additional 82240 Giga Tonnes. Humanities energy consumption is rising steadily, according to U.S. government protections, China alone will add the equivalent of a new 600 megawatt coal plant every ten days for the next ten years. China already burns 4,000 tons of coal each year; coal is cheap, abundant,

Nuclear energy has come a long way over the years. It has proven to be clean, safe, and reliable. But those three things are not the only benefits of nuclear energy. Nuclear energy also proves jobs for many people. With nuclear energy, it is the only source of energy that can replace a significant part of the fossil fuels, which those massively pollute the atmosphere and contribute to the greenhouse effect. I believe that nuclear should be continued to be used. The three reasons I think it should still be used are because of the environmental consequences it prevents, the reliability, and the cost of it.

As each year passes, more and more electricity will be made as a result of increased nuclear power plants around the world. The economic benefits of nuclear energy are equally advantageous as the environmental aspects.

Nuclear power plants around the world produce about 16% of the world’s electricity production. And, this electricity production has an important role in the advances in any industries, agriculture and level of living. Now there is a universally recognition for the importance of limiting greenhouse emissions, and scenarios and strategies are proposed so that we can reach sustainable future energy. However, nuclear energy is predicted to have a share in this future. The current generation of NPPs are not very competitive with the modern thermal power plants in when it comes to thermal efficiency the difference in thermal efficiencies between thermal and nuclear power plants can be 20 – 25%. So, new generation (Generation IV) NPPs with thermal efficiencies that is close to modern thermal power plants with a range of 45 – 50%, should be designed and constructed in the nearest future. So, in this paper an overview will be given in Generation IV NPP.

it is cheap and makes a large amount of energy with a small amount of

Just five pounds of plutonium, a component of nuclear waste, is enough to make a

Many critics argue that due to the Three Mile Island nuclear incident that occurred March 28, 1979, in Pennsylvania resulted in a reactor meltdown, with no casualties due to a combination of equipment failure and a lack of operators understanding what to do to a faulty reactor. This incident has put the majority public to have safety concerns over not only the operators working in the plants but also the civilians in the surrounding area. Yet since the accident, the United States formed the National Academy for Nuclear Training to improve training the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations which reviews and accredits nuclear utilities’ training programs for all key positions at each plant. In addition, nuclear energy plants have proven the ability to produce clean electricity without greenhouse gas emissions and the reliability due to its increased efficiency and increased power output.

Global demand and consumption of energy is at an all time high; the world needs a safe, efficient, clean, and high producing source of energy production. The solution is something we already use for energy production, Nuclear power. From the beginning of nuclear energy there has been concerns over the safety of the power plants and its impact on the environment. With climate change and more accurate information on nuclear power the tide is shifting in its favor. This paper will explore the positives of nuclear power, political change on nuclear power, safety of the energy source and new technologies associated with the nuclear power process. Most importantly are the risks associated with nuclear power worth it? Research suggests that nuclear power is safer now more than ever and has less of an impact on the environment than coal or oil. Public support and misconceptions over the years have been up and down due to political agendas and those who are misinformed about nuclear power. Individuals who are involved in the energy field are in favor of nuclear power and building more plants with newer technology.

The use of nuclear energy is a big topic for debate. Many countries have fully embraced it while others, such as the U. S., haven’t. Nuclear energy is feared for its danger and scorned because of its wastes. On the other hand, nuclear energy does have some pros like cheaper cost of energy and environmentally safe. Reactor breeders show great promise in nuclear waste, but are it enough to convince the nation?

The Americas and the Syria’s energy is mostly diffrante. There is barely anything that is similar or close to be similar. There is barely anything that is similar because Syria is in war right now. Russia is thinking after the Syria’s civil war they are going to build oil refinery. Syria has a big problem with their securing fuel. The Americas are trying to fix the smoke that is keep on coming out of the building