Justin Trudeau's Essay

In contrast, American women hold a minor role in political participation. With only 84 of 435 seats, women face more challenges in American politics than men. (Catalyst) For example, we can look at the most recent election where Hillary Clinton was the victim to many implicit gender bias’. In order to elect the most qualified person to lead a country shouldn’t gender be taken out of the equation? Plato’s approach focuses on electing those who are most qualified and justly, eliminates gender as a factor.

The most adequate of women are being scared away from the political race because of the sexist attacks against women in government. The most suitable women look at past candidates and witness the attacks on them and choose to avoid the political

Canada is identified for its sincere generosity that has presented its entire people the privileges to deliberate themselves in several methods. When relating to more unlucky nations, Canada has obtained the Canadian women the chance and freedom to select whichever profession of their choice. Yet, due to societal customs, women typically acknowledge conflicts, that are depressingly estimated upon by the society and are not clearly recognized into careers that are well thought out as men-orientated. Social customs existing in the Canadian culture, generated obstacles in the society of what professions are customary for women and what careers are recognized for men, which makes a key matter of woman acknowledgment in the political parties. Canada overpowers a succession of debatable subjects concerning femininity correspondence, which directed Canadian culture to improve their opinions. As civilization's interpretations rationalized, it carried numerous optimistic modifications concerning gender societal means through the years, such as the recognition of women to participate in the political parties.. Although, in Canadian politics, it is often seen the lack of contribution women make to the political community. Even though, women are as capable as men to participate in Canadian politics, women in Canadian politics are usually looked down upon due to the historical gender views within society, gender inequality that differentiates between the abilities of between both genders

Rempel, they are also exclusively NDP.”7 (Woolf, 2015) Again, we note that the NDP is

Justin Trudeau, the Canadian Prime Minister, is said to have revolutionized the structure of the Canadian government this past November with his policy for a gender-balanced cabinet. For the first time in Canadian history, the Canadian parliament sits with a 50% female and 50% male cabinet as a reflection of Canada’s diversity (Murphy). Yet what may have stunned citizens even more than the country’s step towards gender equality, was Trudeau’s explanation for the gender parity: “because it’s 2015” (Murphy). Despite it being the 21st century, a century that strives for gender equality in all areas of life, the political arena still “appears somewhat stuck in time” (The Canadian Press).

Naomi Sayer, in her article titled “How Justin Trudeau can show he's a true feminist” for NOW Magazine explores whether Justin Trudeau has fulfilled his promise of being a true feminist leader since being elected in 2015. Naomi expresses how hopeful she was of the Trudeau government’s promises to pass more feminist legislations, unlike the more conservative Harper government. Specifically undoing, “Stephen Harper’s harmful Protection Of Communities And Exploited Persons Act”. Which did nothing to protect marginalized woman on the streets. However, the Liberal government showcased a lack of urgency to change such policies. The article continues by outlining multiple ways the Prime Minister can prove he runs a feminist government. Beginning with

Through in depth analysis of the Canadian Conservative Government, author Brianna Strumm showcases the overwhelming evidence of gender inequality occurring under Stephen Harper’s rule in her article Women in Harperland. This article raises questions in the areas of government, sexist discrimination in social infrastructure and the workplace, and the conservative views on women. I will analyze these questions and offer my own personal opinions on the content, amount of detail used, and whether or not the arguments made are beneficial to the article. Strumm takes a firm liberal stance on each issue presented, providing statistics and circumstances for each of her arguments. The strong evidence and even stronger point of view is crucial to the

The issue I have chosen to engage with is gender parity in the Canadian government. This subject is important since, to this day, we still have non-proportional representation of women in the Canadian government. I believe that there is a strong need for further proportional representation of women in government. It is the correct position since, in order to represent their population, the government should be proportional with regard to their population’s diversity. My position reflects liberal feminism since it is a version of feminism that advocates equal opportunities for women in addition to equal political rights.

For example, a group of men from Manitoba would not be able to represent the interest of a group of women from the Maritime provinces. In order to be able to represent the interest of its population better, the government should be representative in contrast to the diversity of it. The role of a patriarchal society impacts in politics is in direct correlation with women’s self-confidence to run in elections (Cain Miller). In order to achieve gender equality and encourage women to run and participate in political life, we must take actions that will have a significant impact on our stagnant parliamentary gender imbalance

Gender inequality has been a long part of Canada’s history with men being the dominant decision makers. Women have had to fight long hard battles and overcome numerous obstacles to prove themselves and demonstrate that they are equal to men and not inferior. Over the course of a century women have achieved suffrage and have become increasingly visible in the political and economic sectors. Despite all the achievements women have made barriers remain in effect leaving women at a social, economic and political disadvantage even in the twenty-first century. The primary obstacles in achieving gender equality are the noticeable absence of women in authoritative economic and political positions, unfair social stereotypes that are still

This paper argues that enduring gender biases and disparities continue to plague the Canadian political system, leaving women on the sidelines of democratic decision-making and further diminishing their propensity to enter politics. Moreover, this paper investigates this puzzle against the backdrop of socioeconomic, cultural and institutional factors to provide a holistic view of some of the key constraints women face. Finally, this paper offers three policy recommendations to correct institutional gender disparities and to bolster women’s political participation in Canada. The next section will be focusing on the under-representation of women in the Canadian Parliament to demonstrate how gender inequality plays a role in politics, election cycle and

Society sees men with the traits that display more stronger and dominant attitudes that is left women to be in the shadow. Women having a lower income compared to men are not because they work fewer hours, and it is not because they have a lower education level as well (Grant). This shows patriarchy where it revolves around a power system that is organized around the dominance of men. “Even with all of these factors are considered, the result remains the same: a wage gap” (Grant). During the election, it was shown that the majority of the elected members were men (Taber). The results were that 88 out of 338 MPs have been elected into the federal office (Taber), which shows that society does not give many women the opportunity to be

If women continue to be absent from politics and policy making, then women’s voices remain unheard when decisions are made about their lives, bodies, and futures. Further explanation of the impact of this problem can be understood by observing the gender gap between men and women in voter turnout. The gender gap in voting, is between 4 and 10% (Diekman & Schneider, 2010). This relatively small difference can have a large impact in elections and can change entire outcomes of political campaigns (Diekman & Schneider, 2010). For example, when voters report an interest in areas that have historically been considered women’s issues, such as reproductive rights, candidates are more likely to emphasize those issues during their campaigns (Diekman & Schneider, 2010). This example highlights that without increased political participation from women, the continued passage of legislation that positively effects women and girls may be effected. The impact of more women being engaged in politics and political democracy is that it may inspire more women to pursue it. Research has shown that women are more knowledgeable about politics when a woman candidates are on ballot tickets. According to Karp (2008) the presence of women as candidates or as policy-makers’ influences women’s engagement because when women hold elected seats, women’s policy issues are passed in legislatures. A secondary benefit is that more women in positions of power may be a symbolic cue to society that politics isn’t just a “man’s game” (Karp,

The way the article opens shows how some people view women in politics. Women who have great visibility in political spaces has led to the fact that many people, unjustifiably, equated it with women having power in public policy. Therefore, someone can take a look at the fact that women, leading the New York City Council for almost 12 years, are a sign of the great successes that women make as legislators.

Initially it was thought that women were underrepresented in politics and elected office because they were underrepresented in the “eligibility pool” (Welch, 1978, 372). The idea was that women were socialized to believe that their duty was in the home raising children. As such, there were very few women in the “eligibility pool,” the typical jobs that have a tendency to lend themselves to a future in public office: law, business, and medicine among others (Welch, 1978, 373). This line of reasoning would suggest that all that has to be done to increase the proportion of women in public office is to increase their presence in such fields and disciplines (Fox, Lawless, and Feeley, 2001, 412). This explanation, however, falls short. The proportion of women in these careers has increased immensely and yet the disparity still persists (Fox and Lawless, 2011, 60).