The Genocide Of The Ottoman Empire Essay

The Armenian Massacre happened in 1894-1896 and the Armenian Genocide happened in 1915-1920 which was caused by the Turkish Government. The Turkish Government’s aim was to remove all the Armenians living in the Ottoman Empire because they were more educated and wealthier then the Turkish population . The Turkish Government was also worried that the Armenians would become allies with Russia, who were a threat to Turkey . They killed and deported the Armenians to prevent this happening. It has been estimated

During World War I, the government of Turkey sought to rid their country of the Armenians. The Turks and other ethnic groups hated the Armenians for their ability to prosper, even as a minority group with limited rights. This hatred led to the desire to cleanse the Ottoman Empire of Armenian influence. The Turkish people say that the Ottoman empire went through a civil war during this time, which explains the deaths of so many Armenians. Although the Turks claim otherwise, the treatment of the Armenian people during World War I qualifies as a genocide through scale, government involvement, and the usage of the genocide process.

On the positive side, this brought about international attention to the crisis at hand. On the negative side, that attention did not amount to any actual reform in the Ottoman Empire on the behalf of the Armenian people. There is also the matter in which American activists worded the problem that has caused the Armenian people to struggle with self-identity in the United States; I will talk more about this later in this paper. To gather aid for the Armenian cause the ABCFM sat down and devised a plan on how to present the Armenian people in the United States. What came about was that the United States had a duty to intervene in order to save the Christian Armenians because of familiar religious ties. Somehow the Armenians were “unique in the world for their long-standing devotion

The Holocaust was the extermination of Jews along with other groups by the Nazis under the leadership of Hitler. The Holocaust lasted from 1933 to 1945 and took the lives of about 6 million Jews as well as millions of others within other ethnic groups. This was nearly two-thirds of the European Jewish population. The Armenian genocide began in 1915 and ended in 1917. However, brutality to the Armenians did not cease until 1923.This genocide was the massacre of 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman government under the power of the Young Turks. There were around 2 million Armenians living in the Ottoman empire before WWI. By the end of Armenian brutality in 1923, an estimated one and a half million Armenians had been slaughtered and only half a million Armenians were

Meticulous plans were laid so that the Armenian populace could be exterminated with as little resistance as possible. The first step was to kill or disband all Armenian soldiers in the Ottoman Empires army so that there would be little powerful resistance when the

The Armenian Genocide of 1915 was the Ottoman Governments eradication of the Armenians within what is now known as Turkey. Ottoman authorities arrested deported and eventually murdered Armenian subjects, as well as targeting men, women and Christian ethnic groups (Kévorkian, 2011). World War I was a key factor when looking at the Armenian Genocide; in 1914 the Turks entered the war on the same side of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and Germany. Government and military leadership feared the revolt of the Armenians; they

There were many reasons discussed for why the Armenian massacre should be called a genocide or not. The first definition of Genocide adopted by the United Nations stated “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious groups as such (De Waal 2015).” Many believed the meaning of the words “as such” is not clear and some deny that the massacre was “committed with intent”- an argument made frequently in Turkey (De Waal 2015). Even though many alleged perpetrators believe that the massacre was not committed with intent, the Ottoman Empire did attempt to wipe out an entire ethical group. The Armenians were either deported or killed and many women were either beaten or raped. The Armenian diaspora saw the word genocide as the perfect word to describe what happened to their parents and grandparents. They Armenian Diaspora began referring the Meds Yeghern as “the Armenian Genocide”, which sparked a political movement. This political movement was established in 1965 which marked the 50th anniversary of the massacre and the Armenian diaspora was out to seek

Born from the origin Turkey,the turkish, runned out by the mongols out of Asia by the mongols started to follow the muslim religion during the eighth century. Out of following the religion, Strong tribes started to develop from the country, mainly the Seljuk which had become a main power in the islamic world. The type of islamic being

After the interview the Turkish military officials, soldiers and ordinary men sacked Armenian villages and cities and massacred their citizens, many Armenian’s where murdered. As years passed in 1908 a new government came to place overthrowing Sultan Abdul Hamid which was called “young Turks” at first the Armenian’s had hope that things could probably change for them now that they had a different government. But they soon realized that the way these “young Turks” thought was “non- Turks and especially Christian non- Turks were a grave threat to the new state” ( History.com 2010).

The religious and cultural differences within the Ottoman Empire caused most of the conflicts that occurred. Armenia made Christianity its official religion in 4th century A.D and it became part of the Ottoman Empire, a mainly Muslim region, in the 15th century. Similar to the majority

Turkey’s involvement in the World War 1 provided cover for extreme elements of the very nationalistic Young Turks regime to carry out the genocide. The genocide started in 1915, culminated in 1917 and was characterized by mass deportation, slaughter, starvation and raped. Those Armenians who were conscripted in the Turkish army were executed and this was explained as a natural occurrence of war. Pasha was the Leader and chief executor in the mass execution.

Although already Raphael Lemkin used the word "genocide" to refer not only Nazi actions on Jews population but also against the Turks who attacked and massively killed the Armenians. (Boghossian, 70) Not all researchers are willing to rank the absolute disappearance of the Armenians from the peninsula as a genocide. (Boghossian, 71)One of the arguments against this is the fact that no such thing as genocide does not exist in 1915. Therefore, all the massacres a group of people of another group committed by the Third Reich come under this definition. In addition to the history of the Armenian, we can remember a destruction of half of population of Belgian Congo by Belgian empire, imperial policies of America and Australia on indigenous peoples and others. Paul Boghossian

The main goal of these reforms was to move the non-Muslims from an inferior national to a full subject of the Empire. The thought was that if the Sultan gave his minority subjects more rights, per say, than they would not form a separatist movement. Or worse the subjects separatist movement lobby international support; for example, in the Greek national movement in 1821. The Greeks were assisted by France, Romanov Russia, and The United Kingdom. In this way two causes for the Armenian genocide interweave. At the same time as nationalistic centrifugal forces are pulling the Empire apart, Europe is sticking their hands in Ottoman internal affairs. The Tanzimat Reforms were really a failure, and did not promote equal citizenship among citizens. Nor

Approximately one and a half million Armenians were killed from 1915-1923. The remaining part was either Islamized or exiled.” The Armenian Genocide was a horrific event that caused the Armenians to have a major loss in population. From this, the Armenians should have been given reparations, but were not and that still affects them to this day.

In Peter Holquest's The Politics and Practice of the Russian Occupation Armenia, he examines the changes and goals of the Russian policies towards the Armenian community. Holquest begins to explain that Russian policy towards Armenia during World War 1 was to dupe the Armenians. The policy was to allow the Russians to use the Armenians against the Ottoman Turks; this was also a means to annex Turkish Armenia. The policy remains unchanged from 1912 to early 1916; the Russian government avoid any measures that might antagonize the Ottomans (3). The Russian government began to realize that pressing reforms would antagonize the Ottomans and only cause them to reject any sort of treaties or advice. As Turkey began to implement military operations against in 1914, Russian looked at Armenians as allies and as an threat to the Ottomans. Nicholas II proclaimed that a brilliant future awaits Armenia which was not entirely true due to anger under tsarists rule.